02.04.2013 Views

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUNDWATER FLOW TO THE RIVER TAME<br />

<strong>of</strong> channel with a typical dry weather discharge <strong>of</strong> 3.8 m 3 d -1 . <strong>The</strong>re is no conclusive evidence<br />

that discharge to the river channel is higher as it flows across the Birmingham Aquifer than<br />

when it passes above the coal measures or the mudstone. <strong>The</strong> baseflow discharge directly to<br />

the river channel overlying the aquifer for 1999 was 8.86 x10 6 m 3 yr -1 and the total<br />

<strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> discharge to <strong>surface</strong> <strong>water</strong> from the aquifer may be as high as 3.38x10 7 m 3 yr -1 .<br />

<strong>The</strong> analytical methods <strong>of</strong> estimating <strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> discharge, based on spot measurements <strong>of</strong><br />

hydraulic conductivity, head and temperature gradient, show spatial variability in the<br />

discharge from the sandstone aquifer in the range 0.06 to 10.7 m 3 d -1 from individual lateral<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles. Average discharges to the river were 0.76 m 3 d -1 per metre <strong>of</strong> channel (calculated<br />

from the radial flow method) and 1.8 m 3 d -1 per metre <strong>of</strong> channel (calculated using the Darcy<br />

method). <strong>The</strong>se estimates are considerably lower than the 3.8 m 3 d -1 per metre <strong>of</strong> channel<br />

estimated for typical summer baseflow by direct measurement <strong>of</strong> discharge accretion in the<br />

river. A similar occurrence has been noted in other studies (Cey et al.,1998, Harvey et al.,<br />

1993) with estimates <strong>of</strong> Darcy flow amounting to 19-25% <strong>of</strong> the measured baseflow<br />

accretion. This may indicate an unknown geological control or a shortfall in the data coverage<br />

in relation to what is required to estimate flow in a highly heterogeneous system. <strong>The</strong> direct<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> baseflow accretion is considered to provide the best estimate for the<br />

<strong>ground<strong>water</strong></strong> discharge. However, it must be regarded as an upper limit and it is reliant on<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> all the additional sources <strong>of</strong> discharge to the river which is problematic to<br />

obtain in an <strong>urban</strong> setting.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Darcy flow estimates are very site specific to individual points within the riverbed and<br />

give a wide range in specific discharge values from –0.01 to +2.53 md -1 . A high sample<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!