01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

independently examine all the world’s objective processes without either changing them of<br />

disturbing them. As will be presented later in Section 4.4.1. of this <strong>thesis</strong>, the Copenhagen<br />

interpretation repudiates this ideal of objectivity which has been maintained in physics through<br />

the whole of the modern era. In addition, the measurement problem, which is handled in Section<br />

4.4.6., clearly indicates that humans must be thought of as both observers and actors in the<br />

theatre of reality.<br />

3.2. The Position of Humans in Mechanistic-deterministic Reality<br />

Man’s relationship with nature can, in principle, be figured out in two ways. In one, nature can<br />

be viewed as a larger whole to which humans belong and according to whose guiding principles<br />

he must arrange his life. In the other, nature is seen as an opponent which humans must conquer,<br />

tame and make into a servant. 281 In antique times, humans were viewed as a microcosm of an<br />

obviously greater organised whole. In the Christian religion, people were also seen as part of a<br />

cosmic order created by God, even though they were at the same time related to the rest of<br />

creation and also seen as its rulers. This tendency to view nature as something that must be<br />

controlled and made into a servant was reinforced by the new natural science and Cartesian<br />

dualism.<br />

In a certain way, the new image of humans indicated a belief in the omnipotence of human<br />

capabilities. Humans were considered to be conscious thinking subjects, capable of measuring<br />

and manipulating nature and responsible only to themselves independently of both nature and<br />

God. By using intelligence, they were free to develop to ever higher levels, unfettered by<br />

original sin or blind belief. On the other hand, the influence of the revolution in the image of<br />

reality which occurred at the beginning of the modern era in connection with man’s<br />

understanding of his own position resulted in a significant dichotomy. The more that man<br />

struggled to free himself from nature by understanding and controlling its principles, the more he<br />

became conscious that nature’s inevitable processes tied him to his earthly existence. As a result<br />

of the advance of science, man’s belief in freedom was reduced, and in a way, he became<br />

imprisoned within the mechanical image of nature he had created. Concurrent with the stripping<br />

away of all significance and spirtiual dimensions of the world was the loss of humanity’s belief<br />

in its own unique status. The “climax of creation” became nothing more than an animal resulting<br />

281 von Wright 1987, 56-57.<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!