01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in which they can be experienced and on which they are founded. 612 Its theories deal with areas<br />

which are not touched by our everyday experiences and direct observation. In such<br />

investigations, we cannot without problems maintain that our language ”corresponds to reality”<br />

as was thought in the circles of classical physics. The theory of relativity and quantum mechanics<br />

tackled inadequacies in classical language. 613 These theories revealed structures in the world that<br />

”normal” language could not address. The area in which certain concepts are universally<br />

applicable turned out to be limited. The theory of relativity demonstrated that the classical<br />

concept of space and time was only suited to the description of a world in which speeds were<br />

small compared to the velocity of light. At the same time, the discovery of quanta revealed that<br />

the theories of classical physics were idealisations, useful only at the macroscopic level where<br />

effects are so large that quanta can be ignored. 614<br />

Even though the area of applicability of classical concepts has been shown to be limited, we are,<br />

according to Bohr, tied to both our classical language and our classical methods of description.<br />

In portraying new and strange areas we have to be satisfied with the images and concepts that we<br />

recognise. When experience is extended far beyond everyday phenomena, objective or common<br />

inter-subjective description can only be maintained if we adhere to classical language, the use of<br />

which guarantees consistent inter-subjective communication. 615<br />

Det är inte endast så att kännedomen om verkningskvantums odelbarhet och<br />

bestämningen av des värde beror av en analys av mätningar som grundrar sig på klassiska<br />

begrepp, utan det ar fortfarande endast användningen av dessa begräpp som betingar<br />

sambandet mellan kvantteorins symbolik och erfarenheternas innehåll. 616<br />

Bohr drew a clear distinction between a theory’s mathematical formalism (its symbolic scheme)<br />

and the intuitive description offered by classical concepts. But mathematics was also a language<br />

for Bohr. The definition of its symbols and operations is based on the simple and logical use of<br />

normal everyday language. Because it avoids the references to conscious subjects which slip<br />

through in everyday language, mathematics is well suited to objective description and consistent<br />

definitions. It is appropriate for the expression of relationships where verbal communication is<br />

unclear or clumsy. 617<br />

612<br />

Bohr 1958, 69.<br />

613<br />

Bohr 1939, 25 ja Bohr 1963, 59.<br />

614<br />

Bohr 1958, 70.<br />

615<br />

Bohr 1958, 67.<br />

616<br />

Bohr 1967, 19.<br />

230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!