01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eality. 847<br />

Quantum mechanics makes possible the thought that humans play a greater and more active role<br />

in the drama of existence than has formerly been accepted. Within the indeterministic frame of<br />

reference of quantum physics, humans can be viewed as having true evolutionary influence. By<br />

actively reflecting and shaping their environment, humans work inside nature: we create new<br />

models and tools using the possibilities permitted by nature, actualising potential opportunities<br />

contained within the system on the basis of our own understanding and will. This kind of actor<br />

capable of making choices can be understood as an responsible and autonomous subject whose<br />

existence philosophers such as Spinoza, Leibniz, Kant, Husserl and Heidegger have striven to<br />

defend.<br />

Even if it is now possible to defend human autonomy at the same time as humans with all their<br />

subjective states, knowledge and beliefs, values and intentions are ontologically immersed within<br />

nature, it should also be understood that a comprehensive portrayal or theory that incorporates<br />

this kind of activity cannot be provided. Even though, via the concept of state, the quantum<br />

frame of reference offers improved possibilities of modelling conformity to laws in the<br />

development of our internal state, it is essential to note that even in the best models or<br />

descriptions of the world, something external remains. Portrayal is not able to address the<br />

portrayer, the conscious factor, who by modelling strives to achieve an ever better understanding<br />

of themselves and the environment. In the final analysis, the maker of models has to be separated<br />

from the models which are created.<br />

On the basis of quantum mechanics, Roger Penrose and David Hodgson have pointed out that the<br />

computational, mechanical model is not adequate to explain human consciousness. 849 Like<br />

computers, we are capable of arriving at logical conclusions in a formal manner according to<br />

specific algorithms, but formal reasoning only represents part of the overall capacity of our<br />

imagination. Our minds also employ rational ways of proceeding that cannot be reduced to<br />

logical or formal methods of reaching conclusions. Machines always operate on the basis of a<br />

847 In a complementary quantum framework, the dualism between science and humanism as well as between mind<br />

and matter can be reconciled without either losing their special characteristics. All descriptions aspire to different<br />

aspects of a single complex whole.<br />

849 If consciousness emerges from the complexity of the neuron system and brain, it is difficult to explain why all<br />

parts of the brain are not conscious. According to Hodgson, mere processing of information does not imply<br />

consciousness. In many cases, the brain can function like a machine and the task of consciousness could be the<br />

capability to observe, evaluate and interrupt mental functions and reactions that have become automatic. Hodgson<br />

1991,157-168.<br />

332

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!