01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

By assuming that theory corresponds to reality and that the observer is external to the object of<br />

research, physicists have traditionally assumed that a 'complete' theory such as classical or<br />

quantum mechanics should be applicable to microscopic objects as well as to experimental<br />

setups. Physicists have tried many ways of establishing substantive criteria for classicality within<br />

a quantum framework in order to provide a better treatment of classical characteristics. These<br />

include superselection rules, decoherence effects, systems with infinite degrees of freedom and<br />

generalised observables. Most distressingly, none of these appears to be satisfactory; and results<br />

lead to inconsistencies that cannot be resolved in an obvious way. 567 It is confusing that a theory<br />

which is founded on empirical evidence and which as an abstract formalism concentrates on<br />

predicting the results obtainable by measurement, is not able to provide an unambiguous<br />

description of how measurements should be handled within quantum framework. An increasing<br />

number of physicists have begun to suspect that this open problem of measurement may have<br />

far-reaching consequences for the possibility of recognizing an objective reality in physics. 568<br />

According to Instrumentalist thinking, the theory should not be expected to yield direct answers<br />

to questions of what type of world we live in or how the world behaves when measurements are<br />

not taking place. On the other hand, a realistic attempt to understand reality and interpret the<br />

theory might be able, at its best, lead to us reassessing our ideas about the ontological and<br />

epistemological relationship between human beings and the nature in which we exist, which we<br />

manipulate by our actions and describe in our theories. It is no accident that the measurement<br />

problem has become a central question in the debate concerning the interpretation of quantum<br />

mechanics and that the ideas concerning measurement and its significance are widely divergent.<br />

This subject is discussed in greater detail in Section 4.3.6.<br />

4.3. The interpretation of quantum mechanics as a manifestation of change in the<br />

conception of reality<br />

The birth of quantum theory resulted in consternation among several experienced physicists, and<br />

as a consequence, they found it necessary to question many of their earlier beliefs concerning<br />

reality. For example, in the opinion of Sir James Jeans (1877-1946), the universe began to be<br />

more reminiscent of a great thought than a great machine, and Sir Arthur Eddington (1882-1944)<br />

567 Auyang 1995, 82.<br />

568 Mittelstaedt 1998, ix, 103.<br />

215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!