01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

models they create, and contrary to the assumption made in classical physics, cannot be detached<br />

observers of all events which take place in the world of matter.<br />

5.2.2. Embodied representation<br />

Classical physics recognised only the world of matter and influential causes, there was no place<br />

for random events in the world it portrayed. From the viewpoint of quantum physics, the<br />

perceivable physical world is not however unchanging or deterministic, and measurement does<br />

not only reveal things as they are, incidents that have taken place, but can also create new states<br />

of affairs. In its search for absolute invariance, classical physics’ method of explanation requires<br />

that the world is in principle completely open and available to an isolated observer who can<br />

provide a comprehensive and fully-objective portrayal of the events that take place within it. The<br />

problem of measurement implies that humans cannot be excluded from the world they are<br />

investigating. We define and construct experimental situations, and as a consequence of this<br />

activity in reality the desired attributes actualise within the limits of the allowed possibilities. 797<br />

All seemingly absolute and objective natural facts are not, or cannot remain, wholly independent<br />

of the way in which we act and carry out experiments. Even though we need not doubt that all<br />

events in reality conform to laws, nature’s causal lawfulness cannot be identified with<br />

predictability.<br />

By choosing a specific item of measuring equipment, the experimenter essentially presents<br />

nature with a certain type of unique question. The shaping of reality is neither completely<br />

independent of how we act nor does it remain unaffected by our presence. Although the statefunction<br />

gives the probabilities that different possibilities will be realised in an ever-changing<br />

perceivable world, the birth of a specific interaction phenomenon requires manipulation of the<br />

world, either the asking of specific questions or execution of specific experiments, and as a result<br />

of these the perceived physical reality may also change. The shaping of reality by observers<br />

cannot be completely predicted in advance or comprehensively described from an external<br />

viewpoint, even by employing statistical laws, although this way of thinking is one which has<br />

become generally familiar. Knowledge is not just a mirror in which reality is reflected, it is a<br />

797 Even if human beings create different kind of circumstances where various attributes may appear, observation<br />

does not directly influence the formation of reality. The objective structures of observable reality can still however<br />

change as a result of human action. Humans influence both the formation of reality and the distribution of<br />

consequent possibilities.<br />

307

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!