01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in physics is a psychic concept. The fundamental indivisible units or elements of things out of<br />

which Being consists are monads which exist beyond “a purely geometrical concept of matter”<br />

and “purely geometric laws of motion. The monads do not have extension and thus they have to<br />

be spiritual i.e. immaterial units. Everything that was material could be seen as phenomena<br />

related to these spiritual realities which able to develop and understand their environment 309<br />

As a mathematician and natural researcher, Leibniz did not doubt that nature’s physical<br />

processes should take place in accordance with physical laws, but he wanted to link the new<br />

doctrine of natural science to the traditional metaphysical system. For Leibniz, the world was –<br />

more or less – our experiences, but at the level of phenomena, he considered it quite in order to<br />

speak of bodies acting upon one another and of causal relationships. He agreed with most of the<br />

ancient philosophers that ”Every spirit, every created simple substance is always united with a<br />

body and no soul is ever entirely without one”. 310 Leibniz considered that every part of the world<br />

was somehow connected to every other part and the coalesce of matter and spirit was possible,<br />

since bodies were aggregates of monads and the mental laws governing the mind were clearly<br />

differed from physical laws. Physics was adequate to represent deductive systems, such as<br />

mechanics. It is able to tell what is happening, but not why it is happening. Physics is useful and<br />

reliable, but it is also limited.<br />

In his New Essays on Human Understanding, Leibniz commented widely on the thoughts of the<br />

English philosopher John Locke (1632-1704). In his philosophy, Locke had attempted to chart<br />

the nature of human understanding and mental laws by using scientific approach. He believed it<br />

was possible to explain the capabilities and limits of reason by empirical method. 311 Leibniz<br />

admitted that knowledge begins in experience but was critical of Locke’s concept that the soul is<br />

a blank writing tablet on which nothing has yet been written – a tabula rasa – and that everything<br />

inscribed there comes solely from the senses and from experience. As a rationalist, Leibniz<br />

believed, like Plato and the Scholastics, that only reason was capable of establishing reliable<br />

rules. Although the senses are necessary for the acquisition of knowledge, they are not capable of<br />

providing all of it. Leibniz was critical of Locke for not being able to see that we have something<br />

potential within us. We have reason and acquired dispositions of which we are not always<br />

309<br />

Jones 1969, 220-226. As a monad was not a body it must be a mind. Reasoning follows from the Cartesian<br />

dualistic principle that everything that is not a body is mind<br />

310<br />

Aspelin 1995, 319, 324. Leibniz 1981, 58.<br />

311<br />

Ketonen 1998, 90-95.<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!