01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hundred senses of the word ‘free’ have so far been identified. 295 Many thinkers have<br />

distinguished between positive and negative freedom. ‘Positive’ liberty is something else than<br />

just the absence of restraint or impediment to our actions. Our personal autonomy or selfgovernment<br />

cannot thus be guaranteed even if physical laws were indeterministic. From the<br />

framework of natural science, however, lack of determinism may be viewed as a necessary<br />

condition for allowing the real possibility of human intervention and choice.<br />

One result of the abandonment of the concept of final cause is that even the effect of human<br />

goals in influencing the shaping of objective processes of the world has not been clearly<br />

represented. The anticipation of determinism in all events has led to a tendency to ignore the fact<br />

that a person usually has the ability to act in many different ways in any given set of<br />

circumstances. We feel that we are able to make decisions and direct our actions. Ignoring this<br />

impression may be a deficiency that has affected not only physicists, but also biologists,<br />

behavioural psychologists and computer engineers. Even though no-one has disputed the fact<br />

that humans operate within the natural world and that our collective actions change the face of<br />

the world, viewing nature as an objective process has meant that the significance of human<br />

activity in bringing about changes in reality could be minimised for an extended period.<br />

Indeterministic quantum mechanics forces us to address the question of whether the actions of an<br />

individual carrying out experiments can truly be excluded from the world studied by physics. As<br />

will be presented in more detail in sections 4.3. and 4.4.1. of this <strong>thesis</strong>, it appears that certain<br />

natural phenomena are only observable in specific experimental conditions, so that the form of<br />

the questions we ask of nature essentially defines the answers that it is possible to obtain. This as<br />

such is nothing new. Natural scientists conducting experiments had to interfere with nature even<br />

when observing the deterministic phenomena of classical physics. Experimental situations had to<br />

be simplified and isolated from the surrounding environment in order for it to be possible to<br />

control and modify the factors which it was known would affect the results obtained. The future<br />

behaviour of a mechanical system cannot be predicted before a suitable experimental setup has<br />

been constructed and the system’s free parameters have been assigned the required values. Even<br />

though the deterministic laws of the macroscopic world guaranteed that the same set of<br />

preconditions always yielded the same set of results, it was only conscious action by human<br />

beings that made it possible to repeat experiments and exploit natural phenomena. 296<br />

295<br />

Galen Strawson, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 743-752.<br />

296<br />

Petersen 1968, 150-154. In astronomy, the ideal of external objectivity has been achieved best in cases where it<br />

is difficult to carry out proper experiments.<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!