01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In contrast to Heisenberg, Bohr did not consider mathematical consistency to be the most<br />

important value. He wanted to achieve a deeper understanding of the uncertainty relationship and<br />

wave-particle dualism by believing that these features in some manner reflected the structure of<br />

reality. As will be described in greater detail in Section 4.4.2, Bohr wanted to hold on to classical<br />

concepts and he searched for new connections between them and reality by employing the idea<br />

of complementarity. He considered the uncertainty relationship to be a mainstay of the doctrine<br />

of complementarity, and thought that in the same way that descriptions of position and<br />

momentum in quantum mechanics are complete in themselves and modifiable to each other by<br />

employing Fourier transformations, classical descriptions and concepts such as the particles and<br />

waves employed in describing atomic systems are perfectly suitable in specific experimental<br />

situations. Simultaneous employment of such complementary type descriptions was not however<br />

possible, since quantum theory did not permit experimental situations in which both aspects of<br />

such systems could be defined exactly at the same moment. In this sense complementarity has a<br />

clear physical meaning.<br />

Following a long discussions with Bohr, Heisenberg also recognised that even though our<br />

classical language does not work at the atomic level, we are not able to abandon it. 532 Even<br />

though the world is not divided into parts in the way we have learned to become familiar with on<br />

the basis of our experiences at the macro level, we do not have any better tool than natural<br />

language to describe our experimental observations. However, the uncertainty relationship did<br />

make clear the fact that the concepts of Newtonian mechanics were not, on their own, adequate<br />

for quantum mechanics, since the position and velocity of particles could never be known with<br />

absolute precision. At the same time, it became clear that all the attributes associated with a<br />

system in all its different situations could never be known at one time. The uncertainty<br />

relationship is also linked to the statistical predictions given by quantum mechanics. For<br />

example, the exact decay time of a radioactive alpha particle cannot be defined precisely because<br />

if it could be, alpha particles could not be also understood as waves leaving the atomic nucleus,<br />

something which can be experimentally demonstrated. Paradoxical tests of this type which<br />

expose the wave and particle nature of atomic matter compel us to be satisfied with the statistical<br />

conformity to laws. 533<br />

4.2.4. Non-locality and entanglement (Quantum co-operation)<br />

532 Folse 1985, s. 90-97.<br />

204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!