01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

either religion or ethics. Also science, whose reliability Kant had relegated to dependence on the<br />

human cognitive structure, lost its foundations in twentieth-century physics when the absolute<br />

categories of Newton and Euclid, on which Kant based his a prioris such as time, space,<br />

substance and causality, were no longer deemed to be necessary foundations for the scientific<br />

approach. 333 On the other hand, two points made by Kant still stand. Firstly, that we need to have<br />

some metaphysical framework: humans cannot obtain knowledge of nature’s universal laws by<br />

simply waiting for the correct answers, they must present nature with questions which are based<br />

on hypotheses. An approach to the world requires an a priori hypo<strong>thesis</strong> in order for it to be<br />

observable and testable. Secondly, that our sensations can only provide us with intelligible<br />

experiences if they conform to our framework. Quantum mechanics bestows credibility on<br />

Kant’s <strong>thesis</strong> that physics does not address nature as it actually is, only via our relationship to it –<br />

nature as if presents itself to human questioning. 334<br />

3.3.3. Romantic natural philosophy in Germany<br />

Kant conceded that, in metaphysics, it is possible to think of things ”as such”, but left his<br />

followers to answer the question of what to think about. In German philosophy, after Kant’s<br />

demise, his Critical idealism quite rapidly became genuine Idealism with the elimination of the<br />

”things as such”, with the consequence that no reality independent of the conceiving subject<br />

remained. In his objective idealism, G.F.W. Hegel (1770-1831), Kant’s most important<br />

successor, attempted to combine man and nature, mind and matter, as well as time and eternity<br />

into an all-embracing multi-dimensional and developing dialectic process. Hegel viewed the<br />

whole of world history as a process of development of an ”absolute spirit”. Investigation of the<br />

laws of this “self-movement” he called a dialectic.<br />

In his extreme Rationalism, which in experimental terms was difficult to distinguish from<br />

Irrationalism, Hegel attempted to show that all the features of existence were necessary. He<br />

considered philosophy to be ”an objective science of truth, a science of its necessity, of<br />

conceptual knowing, it is no opining and no web spinning of opinions”. 335 Hegel abandoned the<br />

333<br />

Even though the general statement of causality is synthetic a priori, general and necessary, all the specific<br />

causal laws are empirical. They are no more certain in Kant’s doctrine than they are in empiristic epistemology.<br />

Aspelin 1995, 379.<br />

334<br />

Trusted 1991, 125, Tarnas 1991, 351, 358-359.<br />

335<br />

Hegel 1985, 17. In his Phenomenology of Mind, Hegel expressed an extended and trenchant critisism of<br />

Newton. Burtt 1980, 35.<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!