01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

incorrect. Aquinas took the view that understanding the order and beauty of the world of creation<br />

could not be in conflict with either the glory of God or his better comprehension. Nothing that<br />

reason could discover could in fact be in fundamental disagreement with either theological<br />

teachings or with religious faith, since both reason and belief were derived from the same source.<br />

Even though spirit and nature were separate from one another, they were at the same time<br />

intertwined aspects of a single homogeneous whole. The history of one affected the history of the<br />

other. In this way, freely-acting and self-realising human beings in no way reduced God’s<br />

infinite creativity and omnipotence, they actually promoted His will. 145<br />

Thomas Aquinas shaped a comprehensive syn<strong>thesis</strong> of the doctrines of Aristotle and Plato. In a<br />

similar manner to Aristotle, he saw the soul as the form of the human being and the body as its<br />

matter. Sensory experience and reason fed each other. Sensory experience was necessary to<br />

awaken reason’s potential knowledge of the universals, since humans had no direct access to the<br />

realm of transcendental ideas. Aquinas did not, however, wish to interpret individuals as<br />

completely separate and distinct substance, nor did he wish to see the world of matter as<br />

separated from God. He linked created beings to each other and to God by using Plato’s idea of<br />

participation. Individuals participated in God’s existence, which was the foundation of all<br />

being. 146 Through his syn<strong>thesis</strong>, Aquinas made Aristotle legitimate, and made it possible for<br />

Greek rationalism and naturalism to access the Christian culture which permeated the whole of<br />

Europe in the Middle Ages. From 1150 to 1650, Aristotle can be regarded as the most important<br />

philosopher influencing European thought. His Physics was widely read and discussed, and over<br />

the centuries, his natural philosophical concepts concerning teleological explanations, the<br />

elements and cosmology became an inviolable part of the Scholastics holistic conception of<br />

nature, a conception which related to not only the material world but also to the role played by<br />

human beings in the world and their relationship with God. 147<br />

Mediaeval science was clearly structured from the bottom upwards. It was based on Aristotle’s<br />

physics and metaphysics, and the top of the pyramid consisted of theology as the highest form of<br />

intellectual knowledge. In contrast to opinions being voiced by historians of science even in the<br />

1950s and 1960s, there is no good reason to regard mediaeval science as being undeveloped.<br />

Claims that the Middle Ages made no significant contribution to the advancement of science<br />

145 Tarnas 1998, 175-190.<br />

146 Tarnas 1998, 182-188. Aquinas committed himself to the Herculean intellectual task of comprehensively uniting<br />

the Greek and the Christian world views in his Summa Theologica. See Aquinas 1947.<br />

147 Trusted 1991, 6-7. Tarnas 1998, 190.<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!