01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The antique Atomists Leukippos and Democritus 62 , who influenced the Ionian colony in<br />

Southern Thrace in the second half of the 4th century B.C., searched for the primary substance<br />

common to all material things in the same way as other Ionian philosophers. At the same time,<br />

they also attempted to respond to Parmenides’ argument which rejected change and multiplicity.<br />

The Atomists’ basic solution was the same as that of Empedocles and Anaksagoras. The infinite<br />

multiplicity of things and phenomena was reduced to tiny building blocks, atoms, which could<br />

mingle with each other, either combine or divide, in various proportions. 63 The eternal atoms<br />

were too small to be detected by the senses, they were infinite in number, and they came in<br />

infinitely-many different kinds. The atoms moved in infinite empty space which was called ‘the<br />

void’. 64<br />

According to the Atomists, the eternal and indestructible atoms moving in empty space were<br />

what truly existed, but their movement was made possible by the empty space between them. In<br />

addition to being, non-being continued to exist as a possibility for both movement and form, or,<br />

in other words, as empty space. The anti<strong>thesis</strong> of being and non-being in the philosophy of<br />

Parmenides is here made coarser into that of full and void. The Atomists broke up Parmenides’<br />

sphere of being into small fragments and scattered these fragments in what the Eleatics had<br />

called non-being, i.e. the void. While, according to Parmenides, the whole of reality was like a<br />

single eternal and indivisible atom, the Atomists placed an infinite number of these in the void.<br />

Democritus did not see any reason why this non-being, empty space in which atoms could move,<br />

could not actually be being. It merely divided something that was single and indivisible into<br />

many parts. 66<br />

From the contemporary viewpoint, the atomic hypo<strong>thesis</strong> seems to go a long way in the right<br />

direction when it reduces the whole multiplicity of diverse phenomena, the many observed<br />

properties of matter, to the position and motion of atoms. On the other hand, the atom thus<br />

becomes a mere building block of matter, and considering the properties, positions, and<br />

61 Thesleff ja Sihvola 1994, 54-55.<br />

62 Only a few fragments written by the Atomists are available, but their ideas are often referred to in secondary<br />

literature without a clear distinction between these two thinkers being drawn. Theskeff and Sihvola 1994, 63.<br />

63<br />

The multifarious phenomena detectable in nature were born out of different arrangements and movements of<br />

atoms just like comedy and tragedy which could both written with same letters.<br />

64<br />

Kenny 1998, 16-17. Stenius 1953, 159-163. The atomists also developed the thoughts of Melissos. In his search<br />

to establish the ideal of Parmenides’ teachings, Melissos identified the invariant and that which is, and filled the<br />

whole of infinite space with being.<br />

65<br />

Heisenberg 1985, 46, 57.<br />

66<br />

Stenius 1953, 156. Thesleff ja Sihvola 1994, 64-66. Dijksterhuis 1986, 9.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!