01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

proved correct by any quantity of experiments. They appeared to be valid as long as research<br />

continued on the old basis. The new experience gained as a result of quantum mechanics forced<br />

a questioning of the correctness of what were earlier fundamental hypotheses. According to<br />

Kuhn, a resort to philosophy is usually connected to a transitory period. 442 The changing of a<br />

paradigm requires both the abandoning of what was previously a fundamental presupposition and<br />

the postulating of new metaphysical propositions. Because of these factors external to physics, it<br />

is not possible to conduct paradigm change or the formation of a new perception of reality inside<br />

physics, any more than normal science can alter its paradigms using its own points of departure.<br />

When the universal principles intended for a frame of reference are thought to be generally<br />

adequate and applicable to all events, a fundamental attempt to also understand the nature of<br />

reality can be made via comprehensive physical frameworks or paradigms. As can be concluded<br />

from the prolonged debate over the interpretation of quantum mechanics, physical theories or<br />

frameworks do not offer direct answers to such wider metaphysical questions. Abstract<br />

mathematical theories do not even reveal the nature of the entities to which the concepts of the<br />

theory can be applied. These problems were already encountered during the birth of classical<br />

physics. Even if in Principia, Newton clearly separated the mathematical and physical sides of<br />

his theory, the relationship between formal theory and its physical interpretation was considered<br />

problematicalduring during the formation stage of the paradigm. For example, the question was<br />

asked whether the theory completely corresponded to empirical reality or if its truth was simply<br />

the result of the truth of its axioms. 443<br />

When physics became differentiated from philosophy at the beginning of the modern era, it was<br />

supported by a strong metaphysical foundation in addition to its mathematical formalism.<br />

Physics began to unravel the structure and conformity to laws of what was assumed be a threedimensional<br />

material world. In questioning the particular nature of this world, Newtonianism<br />

however had, in spite of its mathematical foundations, rather few fixed elements. Its background<br />

assumptions varied. Newton himself supported the neo-Platonic concept of space as the<br />

immanence of God but developments in mechanical and deterministic direction culminated at the<br />

end of the century in Laplace’s concept of an all-knowing demon, an entity able to calculate<br />

everything in the universe by using mechanistic laws. The metaphysical changeability inherent<br />

in the background to Newtonian mechanics is indicative of the fact that projection of the theory’s<br />

442 Kuhn 1994, s.103.<br />

443 Lehti 1988, 67.<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!