01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The concept of a quantum state which controls the shaping of material phenomena can provide a<br />

simple explanation of certain holistic and non-local features connected with particular brain<br />

activities and phenomena of consciousness. Within the classical mechanistic-deterministic frame<br />

of reference, it is difficult to explain the basis for different states of consciousness such as<br />

dreaming and waking which are typically linked to the presence of different electrical<br />

oscillations in the brain cortex, or what it is that synchronises and combines, for example, visual<br />

information into an integrated whole by activating 40 different brain areas – the binding<br />

problem. 829 It is estimated that the human brain has 10 11 nerve cells or neurons, each of which<br />

has links with hundreds or perhaps thousands of other nerve cells. Even though all the genes<br />

constituting our genetic inheritance were used to control and monitor the birth and maintenance<br />

of the connections between nerve cells, only a vanishingly-small amount of information is<br />

available concerning the birth of this extraordinarily-precise process of biological evolution. 830<br />

As humans, we know that we can if we wish, and also without wishing it, be involved in many<br />

different situations and feelings. Deeper interaction between people and understanding one<br />

another requires, in addition to the exchange of information, empathy and the skill to place<br />

oneself in another’s situation or ”soul-view”. If every individual human is assumed to occupy<br />

their own unique state-space, its nature and the factors it contains can be thought of as directing<br />

our activities and the questions we ask in different interactive situations. We can, for example,<br />

presume that we obtain the projection of other people’s state-space-functions via those basic<br />

vectors on which we ourselves operate. 831 Since everyone of us is bound to our own ”apparatus”,<br />

we cannot assume that we obtain a clear picture of the overall abundance of what is a complex<br />

system, at least when the other system is more complex than our own. For example, through<br />

learning, humans can make choices and even, if they so wish, change some part of the contents<br />

of the mind, but part of their cognitive composition is unconscious and can subconsciously affect<br />

the actions that an individual takes. One example of this is the reactions we learn during<br />

childhood, reactions from which it can be difficult to free ourselves at a later date even though<br />

829 The stability and unity of a person’s identity is also difficult to explain. Why do we usually feel ourselves to be a<br />

whole which is ”ready” as such, even if, for example, learning may cause a multitude of new states within us.<br />

830 Kaila 1998, 11. It has been suggested that the formation of brain is guided by epigenetic information which is<br />

born in interaction between an individual and his/her physical and social environment and constructed above genetic<br />

functions. The birth of this kind of information structure is however difficult to explain within a mechanicaldeterministic<br />

framework.<br />

831 In quantum mechanics, operators coordinatise the quantum system. Other phenomena which are inexplicable<br />

within a mechanistic-deterministic framework could also be better understood by using quantum concepts. For<br />

example, the expansion of consciousness to include new insights could perhaps be viewed in terms equivalent to<br />

quantum tunneling: in certain ircumstances, the mind might be able to use borrowed energy to intrude into an<br />

otherwise forbidden area. Correlation phenomena might explain Heisenberg’s observation that the most-fruitful<br />

developments in the history of human thought occur when two ways of thinking which are similar enough for proper<br />

322

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!