- Page 1 and 2: Tarja Kallio-Tamminen QUANTUM METAP
- Page 3 and 4: Tarja Kallio-Tamminen QUANTUM METAP
- Page 5 and 6: Contents Preface 1. Introduction 11
- Page 7 and 8: Preface Even when I was at school,
- Page 9 and 10: increasingly familiarity with the m
- Page 11 and 12: was there, and whose inspiring work
- Page 13 and 14: As I see it, profound change in way
- Page 15 and 16: scientific method and its objective
- Page 17 and 18: objects featuring in modern physics
- Page 19 and 20: determined and permanent place than
- Page 21 and 22: philosophical context, a conception
- Page 23 and 24: e seen as intertwined and influenti
- Page 25 and 26: time. 24 Even a speculation as abst
- Page 27 and 28: The idea of a single fundamental su
- Page 29 and 30: substance may be one of the known e
- Page 31 and 32: proposed by Pythagoras 42 (ca. 572-
- Page 33 and 34: eing is, and unbeing is not, there
- Page 35 and 36: Empedocles believed that the combin
- Page 37 and 38: The antique Atomists Leukippos and
- Page 39 and 40: elong to actual reality. 71 The tea
- Page 41 and 42: Even though the teachings of the an
- Page 43 and 44: shared a common scepticism, a mistr
- Page 45: perceived and changing sense-world
- Page 49 and 50: own quality. 105 Plato's influence
- Page 51 and 52: icks could be used to make houses.
- Page 53 and 54: deduced in a logical manner. While
- Page 55 and 56: Classical physics concentrated prim
- Page 57 and 58: form. 126 The concept of quantum st
- Page 59 and 60: concepts of the Sceptics and Stoics
- Page 61 and 62: salvation of every human soul. In f
- Page 63 and 64: incorrect. Aquinas took the view th
- Page 65 and 66: way of thinking. 149 Thought concer
- Page 67 and 68: viewpoint, touched all aspects of w
- Page 69 and 70: In the following sections, the outl
- Page 71 and 72: follower of Ptolemy, so after a per
- Page 73 and 74: Copernicus had adhered to Plato’s
- Page 75 and 76: eliefs are symbolised in a vignette
- Page 77 and 78: e mathematical knowledge of quantit
- Page 79 and 80: Democritus’ atomic doctrine, whic
- Page 81 and 82: had simply not been understood corr
- Page 83 and 84: The logic of inductive thought base
- Page 85 and 86: confidence of Europe’s educated c
- Page 87 and 88: Descartes employed many Aristotlean
- Page 89 and 90: 2.3.3. Isaac Newton’s synthesis O
- Page 91 and 92: demonstrate mathematically that suc
- Page 93 and 94: possible. 242 3. The Mechanistic-de
- Page 95 and 96: experiments. Physical events were o
- Page 97 and 98:
mechanical and deterministic ideals
- Page 99 and 100:
it is more important to examine the
- Page 101 and 102:
depend on that body’s velocity. N
- Page 103 and 104:
future development. 272 It is, howe
- Page 105 and 106:
and events observed in the world ca
- Page 107 and 108:
independently examine all the world
- Page 109 and 110:
measured. Even if some people conti
- Page 111 and 112:
and adapted it to both political an
- Page 113 and 114:
hundred senses of the word ‘free
- Page 115 and 116:
world of our perceptions and feelin
- Page 117 and 118:
etween them becomes a problem. How
- Page 119 and 120:
in physics is a psychic concept. Th
- Page 121 and 122:
George Berkeley (1685-1753) Berkele
- Page 123 and 124:
secondary value when compared to kn
- Page 125 and 126:
Order observed in the world is not
- Page 127 and 128:
either religion or ethics. Also sci
- Page 129 and 130:
harmony, was reminiscent of Christi
- Page 131 and 132:
subjective consciousness about each
- Page 133 and 134:
and philosophers, signified the ant
- Page 135 and 136:
experience by affirming anything th
- Page 137 and 138:
esulting from experience, so-called
- Page 139 and 140:
for scientific certainty was the us
- Page 141 and 142:
Devlin, many obvious problems have
- Page 143 and 144:
Democritus’ assumption that all e
- Page 145 and 146:
approached via behaviourism. Favour
- Page 147 and 148:
advocated by Aristotle - i.e. put r
- Page 149 and 150:
into the influence of genes. 392 In
- Page 151 and 152:
3.4.4. The metaphysical foundation
- Page 153 and 154:
inertia, according to which the cha
- Page 155 and 156:
evaluations of our basic beliefs is
- Page 157 and 158:
3.5.1. The conception of reality as
- Page 159 and 160:
W. Whewell in the 1800s that theori
- Page 161 and 162:
When humans learnt how to construct
- Page 163 and 164:
paradigm or research programme cann
- Page 165 and 166:
fit the given mechanistic-determini
- Page 167 and 168:
knowledge concerning reality in an
- Page 169 and 170:
than other modern theories of compa
- Page 171 and 172:
proved correct by any quantity of e
- Page 173 and 174:
Even though the philosophical premi
- Page 175 and 176:
amount of energy. He was not able t
- Page 177 and 178:
acquainted with Rutherford and Thom
- Page 179 and 180:
material. These experiments agreed
- Page 181 and 182:
Hamilton 460 . Erwin Schrödinger,
- Page 183 and 184:
and phases. As every waveform corre
- Page 185 and 186:
measuring yields exact values, it a
- Page 187 and 188:
esult of an experiment. 479 The cha
- Page 189 and 190:
while quantum mechanics has been a
- Page 191 and 192:
4.2. New features connected with qu
- Page 193 and 194:
particles out of these fields using
- Page 195 and 196:
Many of the problems of interpretin
- Page 197 and 198:
abstract and by itself insufficient
- Page 199 and 200:
internmediate states are impossible
- Page 201 and 202:
circumstances where this experiment
- Page 203 and 204:
Since it is not possible to accurat
- Page 205 and 206:
In contrast to Heisenberg, Bohr did
- Page 207 and 208:
In the EPR state, the wave function
- Page 209 and 210:
Precise measurements of correlation
- Page 211 and 212:
Phase entanglement associated with
- Page 213 and 214:
Disturbance caused by measurement a
- Page 215 and 216:
Even if, at first sight, chance app
- Page 217 and 218:
saw that it had become clear that r
- Page 219 and 220:
Correct conception of the matter ha
- Page 221 and 222:
quantum mechanics required a radica
- Page 223 and 224:
defining the observation of phenome
- Page 225 and 226:
mathematical equations of natural s
- Page 227 and 228:
physics. As a philosopher Bohr was
- Page 229 and 230:
structure and emitted radiation, hi
- Page 231 and 232:
in which they can be experienced an
- Page 233 and 234:
objects with the help of natural la
- Page 235 and 236:
Como. 629 At this occasion, in addi
- Page 237 and 238:
complementary way of approaching th
- Page 239 and 240:
ecause we are fettered by our forms
- Page 241 and 242:
The view-point of complementarity a
- Page 243 and 244:
4.3.4. Later attempts to interpret
- Page 245 and 246:
metaphysical determinists complete
- Page 247 and 248:
would require a rational broadening
- Page 249 and 250:
quantum theory directly offer its o
- Page 251 and 252:
concepts as being too bizarre and r
- Page 253 and 254:
mathematician, questioned the tradi
- Page 255 and 256:
Pauli emphasized, in the same way a
- Page 257 and 258:
analyses of the nature of reality a
- Page 259 and 260:
presuppositions and objective ideal
- Page 261 and 262:
abandon the traditional objective w
- Page 263 and 264:
For example, an observer can, using
- Page 265 and 266:
used for measurement defines the co
- Page 267 and 268:
generate a model for the process of
- Page 269 and 270:
oom for their separate existence in
- Page 271 and 272:
a radioactive source is connected t
- Page 273 and 274:
physics, his assertion that a quant
- Page 275 and 276:
appreciated by Einstein, and he wro
- Page 277 and 278:
of action requires that the object
- Page 279 and 280:
Theory of Everything, TOE). He felt
- Page 281 and 282:
usability and their many concrete a
- Page 283 and 284:
Bohr’s way of thinking, touching
- Page 285 and 286:
parameter. Natural laws always rema
- Page 287 and 288:
made to return all events to some i
- Page 289 and 290:
This relationality connected with t
- Page 291 and 292:
influenced by, autonomous subjects
- Page 293 and 294:
new facts revealed by quantum theor
- Page 295 and 296:
5.1.1. Natural philosophy and the d
- Page 297 and 298:
them down into their separate origi
- Page 299 and 300:
eference allows humans located with
- Page 301 and 302:
such strict divisions are unnecessa
- Page 303 and 304:
description of this situation in na
- Page 305 and 306:
form, as does quantum mechanics. 79
- Page 307 and 308:
possible and unavoidable. While the
- Page 309 and 310:
factor through which we are able to
- Page 311 and 312:
ontological-epistemological model d
- Page 313 and 314:
the measurement situation revealed
- Page 315 and 316:
in biology, psychology and sociolog
- Page 317 and 318:
mind epiphenomenal, as causally ine
- Page 319 and 320:
mind, categories such as mental eve
- Page 321 and 322:
e directly understood by reducing t
- Page 323 and 324:
The concept of a quantum state whic
- Page 325 and 326:
Describing reality as a complex qua
- Page 327 and 328:
sees the evolution of life as a pro
- Page 329 and 330:
physics, they had to work within th
- Page 331 and 332:
visible material form and a soul. P
- Page 333 and 334:
eality. 847 Quantum mechanics makes
- Page 335 and 336:
methodological maxim of science can
- Page 337 and 338:
well in all its aspects without the
- Page 339 and 340:
foundation, the highest level in Gr
- Page 341 and 342:
BOHM David and HILEY Basil (1987) A
- Page 343 and 344:
ENQVIST Kari (2003) Kosmoksen hahmo
- Page 345 and 346:
HEISENBERG Werner (1969) Der Teil u
- Page 347 and 348:
KALLIO-TAMMINEN Tarja (2004) Niels
- Page 349 and 350:
NEWTON Isaac (1972) Philosophiae Na
- Page 351 and 352:
REICHEL Hans-Christian (1997) How c
- Page 353:
TREIMAN Sam (1999) The Odd Quantum.