01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

deduced in a logical manner. While Plato, who stressed the role of reason in acquiring<br />

knowledge, advocated strict rationalism, Aristotle has sometimes been viewed as an empiricist to<br />

whom, in the final analysis, knowledge was based on sensory perception. The conflict between<br />

rationalism and empiricism was, however, only radicalised at the beginning of the modern era,<br />

when empiricism was developed into a consistent philosophical programme. 118 Aristotle did not<br />

advocate modern experiential philosophy or Nominalism. Even though he did not believe in<br />

Plato’s ideas, he thought of understanding as targeting the unchanging essence of things, their<br />

permanent basic character. Things were organised into specific classes and our intellect<br />

discovered these unchanging natural classes just as our senses discovered individual objects. 119<br />

2.1.4. The Significance of Antique Thought for Modern Science<br />

The natural philosophers of antiquity rejected earlier mythical and religious ways of explanation<br />

and began a search for intellegible answers to the fundamental questions about the nature of<br />

reality and its formation. The character of the Milesian attempt to make reality and its<br />

phenomena understandable and controllable has been seen as pre-scientific, and their endeavour<br />

has left its stamp on both science and modern-day culture.<br />

Although Plato and Aristotle, the most prominent thinkers of antiquity, employed the teachings<br />

of the pre-Socractics as their starting point, they paid more attention to human life and society in<br />

their all-embracing philosophies. In addition to matter, they stressed the importance of form, and<br />

fought against the Atomist’s teachings to the extent that they advocated mechanical materialism<br />

and the rejection of teleology. Because of this humanistic bias, Plato's and Aristotle's thinking<br />

and divisions in natural philosophy or physics should not be underestimated. 120 Their<br />

fundamental criticism of the Atomists’ way of thinking has largely been forgotten as a result of<br />

the advent of classical physics. Democritus' idea of “dead matter” has become the foundation of<br />

our world-view, and the hypo<strong>thesis</strong> of Plato and Aristotle that matter is something that can<br />

receive form has been abandoned.<br />

117<br />

Niiniluoto 1983, 237. Scholastics in the Middle Ages called these causes “causa materialis”, “causa formalis”,<br />

“causa efficiens” and “causa finalis”.<br />

118<br />

Niiniluoto 1980, 39, 42. Ketonen 1989, 57.<br />

119<br />

Aspelin 1995, 113.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!