01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

influence of the observer, could be eliminated from theories. For his part, Bohr did not believe<br />

that the influence of a conscious subject could be removed from the process of description: he<br />

created a wide general rationalisation from the experience that was then available. 734 According<br />

to classical assumptions, improved theory resulted in more-accurate representation and the<br />

unconscious manifestation of human-centredness could be eliminated, but Bohr’s objectivity<br />

came to mean inter-subjectivity and unambiguous communicativity. To him, the history of<br />

science appeared to be the understanding of our concepts and experiences with an everincreasing<br />

degree of finesse. The observer’s metaphysical independence of the world being<br />

investigated is seen as a requirement for the separability demanded by Einstein. 735 In contrast to<br />

classical physics, however, quantum mechanics appears to prohibit separability: two systems<br />

which have interacted at an earlier point in time are described in a combined state, even though<br />

the systems are widely separated from each other.<br />

Since quantum theory did not completely satisfy the ideals of classical physics regarding<br />

description, it was Bohr’s opinion that generalisation of the whole of the earlier classical<br />

framework of description, the one familiar from its use of causal space-time description, was<br />

required. 736 In his framework of complementarity, Bohr viewed human being as being<br />

conditioned by their experiences: they were not equipped with language suited to all levels of<br />

reality. Bohr did not believe that by using language developed to portray the macroscopic world,<br />

humans would also be able to shape a ”correct” visualisation of the microscopic world. On the<br />

other hand, he was of the opinion that even though we do not have any guarantee of the efficacy<br />

of language or its true correspondence to the world, we can, step by step, through our<br />

experiences and the use of complementary models, compose an ever-improving portrayal of the<br />

world that we influence.<br />

In his unified theory, Einstein was clearly searching for a model which could once again<br />

overcome the doubts raised by quantum theory concerning the influence of humans. Obviously,<br />

both measurement and observations should, in the final analysis, form part of this theory in some<br />

way, and we would have to be able to portray our own activity from an external viewpoint in an<br />

absolute manner. This was something that Bohr considered to be impossible. Humans are bound<br />

to and dependent on the whole world system at a fundamental level. According to his son, Bohr<br />

even doubted whether science and mathematics would some day discover ”The Answer” (a<br />

734 Hooker 1991, 507.<br />

735 Howard 1994, 206.<br />

736 Folse 1985, 222.<br />

277

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!