01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

actually aware. 313<br />

In the style of ancient thinkers, Leibniz also paid attention to problems connected with the<br />

division of matter. In his youth, he had been strongly influenced by atomic theory via Gassend,<br />

and he considered Descartes’ concept of extended matter to be contradictory and inadequate as a<br />

way of explaining the whole of reality. Leibniz viewed the atomic hypo<strong>thesis</strong> as valuable natural<br />

science, but insufficient for metaphysics, in which the search was for ultimate principles. If it is<br />

presumed that matter is continuous and infinitely divisible, there can be no true parts, only<br />

arbitrary division. On the other hand, if matter is presumed to consist of different indivisible<br />

parts, a whole formed from these parts cannot be a real whole, only a arbitrary collection. This<br />

kind of metaphysical theorising about the relationship between parts and wholes has received<br />

new impetus as a result of modern physics, since in some specific situations matter appears as<br />

localised particles, while in others it appears to be continuous waves. 314<br />

As an idealist monist, Leibniz did not have a fundamental belief in the absolute existence of<br />

space and time, he thought that we conceived the idea of them via our natural disposition to fix<br />

and relate phenomena. As the world was an organism which consisted of countless minute<br />

perceivable spiritual organisms (i.e. monads) no substance ever lacks activity. There is never a<br />

body without movement and at every moment in time, there is within us an infinity of<br />

perceptions which are alterations in the soul itself. 315 Like Spinoza, Leibniz rejected Descartes’<br />

interactive doctrine and adopted the idea of parallelism. States consisting of monadic complexes<br />

which we called living bodies and states of conscious monads which we called souls<br />

corresponded perfectly to one another. Leibniz was not however viewed as having been able to<br />

provide a more satisfactory explanation of the relationship between mind and matter than either<br />

Spinoza or Descartes. The orderliness in the sequences of well-founded phenomena was a<br />

consequence of the pre-established harmony ordained by God. 316 The connection between mental<br />

and material aspects was evidently impossible to understand from a dualistic standpoint, in<br />

which the mind could only be aware of its own state and the material world was just a<br />

mechanical machine obeying absolute laws.<br />

312<br />

At the same time, Leibniz realised that the study of probabilities might lead to valuable theoretical and practical<br />

results if this mathematical method could define the statistical probabilities of possible events. Aspelin 1995, 321-<br />

322.<br />

313<br />

Leibniz 1981, 48-49, 51-52.<br />

314<br />

Aspelin 1995, 325.<br />

315<br />

Leibniz 1981, 53.<br />

316<br />

Trusted 1991, 88-92. Aspelin 1995, 326. Collingwood 1960, 110-112<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!