01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

appreciated by Einstein, and he wrote about both theories in favourable terms, recommending<br />

their creators for the Nobel Prize. In contrast, he considered Born’s statistical interpretation and<br />

relativistic quantum theory to be worthless. Writing to Max Born in December 1926 he<br />

expressed doubt about whether quantum mechanics, in spite of it being so very influential, was<br />

actually ”the real thing”. An inner voice told him that regardless of its good sides, quantum<br />

theory did not carry us any closer to ”the secret of the Old One… who does not play dice”.<br />

Einstein never accepted Bohr’s complementarity interpretation. Writing to Schrödinger in 1928<br />

he described Heisenberg’s and Bohr’s thinking as intelligently fabricated philosophy or a<br />

sedative religious cushion which believers found it difficult to dispense with. 724 After the<br />

dramatic encounter between Einstein and Bohr which took place in Brussels 20-25 October<br />

1930, Einstein gave up trying to show that quantum mechanics is logically inconsistent. In the<br />

second, American phase of the thirty year struggle between the two men, Einstein tried to show<br />

that quantum predictions are inconsistent with any reasonable idea of reality. Bohr’s answer, in<br />

effect, was "We have to revise our idea of reality". 725<br />

If quantum theory is complete, the laws of nature are statistical, something that Einstein, who<br />

was searching for laws of nature which were fully symmetrical, objective and deterministic, was<br />

never able to accept. He did not wish to jettison traditional continuity and causality but presented<br />

new thought experiments in which he attempted to show that Bohr’s interpretation of quantum<br />

mechanics was incomplete. The best known of these was the EPR paradox presented in 1935 and<br />

described in Section 4.3.4. of this <strong>thesis</strong>. Bohr succeeded in defending his point of view by<br />

emphasising the indivisibility of quantum phenomena, the necessity of taking account of the<br />

whole experimental situation, and complementarity. The continuing divergence of Einstein’s<br />

concepts was however a source of acute discomfort to him. Bohr is known to have engaged in<br />

discussion with Einstein in his mind until his death. Even though Einstein focused his powers on<br />

the search for a unified theory, he never ceased pondering quantum theory and its interpretation.<br />

He once said to his friend Otto Stern that he had spent a hundred times longer thinking about the<br />

quantum problems than he had about the general theory of relativity. 726<br />

Even though the discussions between the two men, which were in essence a dispute about the<br />

completeness and consistency of quantum mechanics, did not usually directly touch basic<br />

724 Pais 1991, 320.<br />

725 J.A. Wheeler in Jahn (ed.) 1981, 87.<br />

726 Pais 1982, 8.<br />

274

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!