01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pauli emphasized, in the same way as Heisenberg, that the situation we meet when analysing<br />

observations in quantum mechanics forces us to abandon Cartesian dualism. In particular, Pauli<br />

was critical of the idea of psychophysical parallelism created on the basis of this dualism.<br />

Parallelism remains a foggy spiritual cloud in western thought because it still is without scientific<br />

motivation, and also because, over the last few centuries, it has resulted in a sharp distinction<br />

being made between natural sciences and humanistic sciences as well as between science and<br />

religion. For Pauli, the complementarity of quantum mechanics provided a model for<br />

approaching the psychophysical problem. He thought that physical and psychic phenomena are<br />

mutually complementary in the same way that the wave description and the particle description<br />

are complementary in atomic theory. Both are manifestations of an abstract transcendent whole<br />

that is not describable within the framework of any rational theory. 682<br />

Pauli’s sketchy attempt to outline a psycho-physical reality can be criticised from many<br />

directions. In his model, Pauli to some extent actually explained away the new freedom<br />

discovered in nature. The world as he portrayed it was neither completely random nor did it give<br />

humans real freedom, since the archetypes could affect test results and lead development in any<br />

direction they desired, for example via the experimenter’s subconscious mind. When it appeared<br />

that physical laws no longer determined the results of individual experiments, the traditional<br />

objective way of thinking perhaps pushed Pauli into searching for metaphysical causes. The<br />

ontological way of approach he was targeting is unavoidably problematical when talking about<br />

phenomena which cannot be directly observed. Even though the psycho-physical problem<br />

obviously vanishes if reality is postulated as psycho-physical, the more accurate portrayal of<br />

such a postulated metaphysical reality remains a problem. David Bohm did not speak about<br />

archetypes, but instead drew attention to the active information and implicate order present in<br />

reality.<br />

Bohm notes that the quantum wholeness brought out in his idea of quantum potential is<br />

reminiscent of the wholeness usually associated with living organisms. The whole may be said to<br />

organise the activities of the parts in a way that is not obtained by putting together the parts of a<br />

machine. His notion of active information begins to resemble the domain of mind and suggests a<br />

rudimentary mind-like behaviour in matter, since for Bohm, the essential quality of mind is just<br />

some kind of activity of form rather than of substance. Active information is simultaneously<br />

physical and mental in nature and accounts for the inseparability of the mental and physical sides<br />

682 Laurikainen 1997, 30-31, 84.<br />

254

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!