01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

knowledge of reality, an interpretation emphasised by K.V.Laurikainen, who was well<br />

acquainted with Pauli’s thoughts in particular. 593<br />

Even though the concept of the ontological nature of the wave function remained obscure, the<br />

Copenhagen group agreed that the wave function makes quantum mechanics a holistic theory. In<br />

an experiment involving ’similar’ and ’similarly-prepared’ particles, the state function combines<br />

individual events into a whole. Individual particles have the property of behaving statistically in<br />

the way described by the wave function, and the wave can only be demonstrated by using a very<br />

great number of ’similar particle events’. They believed that this was an expression of the very<br />

essence of reality and that there was no reason to expect that this feature would be eliminated by<br />

a future development of the theory. The new physics was essentially statistical by nature. The<br />

classical concept of causality was inapplicable and for human beings, the world was not totally<br />

predictable. Pauli in particular stressed statistical causality and statistical laws as the most<br />

characteristic feature of quantum mechanics. 594<br />

At first, Bohr used to say that ”causality is not valid in microphysics” but avoided the phrase<br />

after 1957 when the Soviet Academian V.A. Fock visited Copenhagen and pointed out that there<br />

are laws even in microphysics although they are of a different kind to those of macrophysics.<br />

From the very beginning, Bohr, however, emphasised that causality must be generalized to the<br />

’framework of complementarity’. In practice, this generalization means the idea of statistical or<br />

probabilistic causality. 595 Bohr believed that statistical laws and complementarity were linked to<br />

the fact that the particle description and wave description had to be associated with one and the<br />

same object. This fact implied that the concept of ’object’ was obscured at the microscopic level<br />

and that the classical space-time description became unambiguous.<br />

4.3.2. Niels Bohr’s epistemological lesson and the framework of complementary<br />

Bohr emphasized the epistemological lesson given by quantum theory and considered his<br />

doctrine of complementarity in an obvious way resulting from the new situation encountered in<br />

593<br />

When criticising realism, K.V. Laurikainen often used the statement that natural science only describes our<br />

knowledge. He saw that by interpreting matter waves (i.e. the state function of quantum mechanics) as describing<br />

our knowledge of reality, the paradoxes of quantum theory disappear. The unpredictable reduction of the statefunction<br />

happens only in our consciousness as our knowledge of the situation changes. Laurikainen 1997, 36-37.<br />

594<br />

Laurikainen 1997, 37, 40-41.<br />

595<br />

Laurikainen 1997, 40.<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!