01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ontological and epistemological questions, Bohr’s and Einstein’s different concepts of the<br />

position of the observer, the nature of physical description and change in the world are, in my<br />

opinion, central ones when attempting to assess the tenability of their views. In Bohr’s thinking,<br />

these themes, traditionally kept separate, are seamlessly interwoven.<br />

The position of the observer<br />

Einstein continued the Newtonian and classical physics’ tradition of attempting to describe the<br />

world in an objective manner from an external viewpoint. When Newton combined earthly and<br />

cosmic phenomena in his theory of gravity, he also divided the world into two parts in a new<br />

way. There was the world in which we live and we die, and a world revealed by science which<br />

was ruled by absolute laws and in which there was, in principle, no space for human activity.<br />

Even though these two worlds are combined in practice, they have been in theory completely<br />

separate. 727 Newton’s laws did not assume the physical existence of an observer. The ”knowing<br />

subject” was usually thought of as a non-physical mind which can observe and describe the<br />

world ”as it is” and not influence it when doing so.<br />

In his theory of relativity, Einstein discovered a general and invariant theoretical description<br />

which in principle allowed us to overcome the obstructions of our occasional position as<br />

observers. As with relativity theory, quantum mechanics can be understood as offering a general<br />

theoretical portrayal of all the possibilities connected with different events. On the other hand,<br />

Einstein did not reckon that in the theory of relativity, the observing subject cannot be treated as<br />

completely external. Since absolute time and space do not exist, specific events can only be<br />

handled when it is known in which system the observer is located and to what his observations<br />

are being compared. 728 Bohr placed emphasis on the position of the observer. He focused<br />

attention on the logical affinity between the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics in<br />

matters related to an observer, something that demanded a renewal of conventional ideas<br />

concerning physical reality.<br />

Bohr pointed out that relativity theory brings with it the constant velocity of light and quantum<br />

mechanics’ Planck constant. As the speed of light is finite, space and time cannot be separated<br />

from each other in an unambiguous way without recourse to the observer, and Planck’s quantum<br />

727 A. Koyré in Prigogine ja Stengers 1984, 35.<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!