01.05.2013 Views

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

QUANTUM METAPHYSICS - E-thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

philosophical works he also wanted, over and above his empirical laboratory work, to defend the<br />

right of metaphysics to exist. Lotze saw that in the final analysis, human intelligence would not<br />

be satisfied with an impeccable description of observed events, but that it would also strive to<br />

interpret the world to which human beings belonged. For this reason, it was essential to proceed<br />

further than what was offered by observed reality and use the metaphysical way of thinking.<br />

According to Lotze, each thinking being walked this road, even though they might claim that<br />

they did not busy themselves with such unscientific questions. For Lotze it was better to be a<br />

conscious metaphysicist than an unconscious one. 401<br />

In discussions with Positivist philosophers at a conference organised in Copenhagen, Niels Bohr<br />

wondered why Philip Frank had used the term ’metaphysics’ in his lecture simply as a curse or,<br />

at best, as a euphemism for unscientific thought. Frank had spoken of metalogic and<br />

metamathematics and Bohr could not see why this prefix ’meta’ which merely suggests that we<br />

are asking further questions, i.e. questions which bear on the fundamental concepts of a<br />

particular discipline, could not be connected with physics. Bohr fully endorsed the Positivist<br />

insistence on conceptual clarity, but their prohibition of any discussion of wider issues simply<br />

because of a lack of sufficiently clear-cut concepts in this particular realm, did not appear very<br />

useful to him. Such a ban would prevent our understanding of quantum theory. 402<br />

Metaphysics is an abstract dicipline which concerns exploration of the most general features of<br />

the world, the broad nature of reality, and the possibility of its objective representation. It can be<br />

divided into three parts: conjectures, basic presuppositions, and mystical beliefs, between which<br />

it is impossible to draw clear lines. Speculative conjecture can lead to empirical theories and<br />

even to fundamental presuppositions, and even though many mystical beliefs can be rejected as<br />

being nothing but nonsense, we can never be certain whether some of them are still left to the<br />

group of fundamental presuppositions that we cherish as being true. Speculative guesswork has<br />

played an essential part in the development of science. Even though its predictions cannot always<br />

be verified immediately in any experiment, they are neither insignificant or meaningless. Just the<br />

reverse, they can turn out to be viewpoints which are extremely informative and which drive<br />

development forward. For example, Democritus’ atomic theory or the proposition put forward by<br />

Copernicus that space was so large that the earth could perhaps be moving even though the fixed<br />

stars appeared to remain stationary, was later proved to be justified on the basis of observations.<br />

On the other hand, it has never been possible to prove by observation that Newton’s theory of<br />

401 Aspelin 1995, 515.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!