11.08.2013 Views

Final Report Lot 9: Public street lighting - Amper

Final Report Lot 9: Public street lighting - Amper

Final Report Lot 9: Public street lighting - Amper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

experience from a team member as former responsible for over 750,000 <strong>street</strong> <strong>lighting</strong> points)<br />

were compaired with catalogue prices. Taking into account that most custumers are smaller, a<br />

weighed average was proposed in an expert meeting with European sector organisations. The<br />

sector experts agreed with this proposal.<br />

The LMF values in the tables are chosen in accordance with technical report CIE 154 and are<br />

related to the ingress (IP-rating) and 'defined pollution categories'.<br />

For road categories F (fast traffic) and M (mixed traffic) in this study the 'medium pollution'<br />

category is used, defined as: “Moderate smoke or dust generating activities nearby - Moderate<br />

to heavy traffic - The ambient particulate level is no more than 600 micrograms per cubic<br />

metre”.<br />

For road category S (slow traffic) the 'low pollution' category is used, defined as: “No nearby<br />

smoke or dust generating activities and a low ambient contaminant level - Light traffic -<br />

Generally limited to residential or rural areas - The ambient particulate level is no more than<br />

150 micrograms per cubic metre”.<br />

The LLMF values in the tables are chosen in accordance with technical report CIE 154 (2003),<br />

adapted to the new values presented by ELC.<br />

The factor UF results from photometric calculations.<br />

For this calculations, road geometry and pole distances were taken in accordance with typical<br />

values in chapter 3.<br />

The average illuminance Eavg [lx] on the road was calculated for different luminaires.<br />

For the illuminated area one section between poles, A [m²] = road width [m] x pole distance [m]<br />

was taken and accordingly the luminous flux emitted by one lamp [lm].<br />

Because:<br />

Eavg [lx] = Useful luminous flux [lm] / A [m²]<br />

we can calculate the useful luminous flux.<br />

So UF can be calculated as:<br />

UF = Useful luminous flux / Luminous flux emitted by the lamp.<br />

Putting into service was taken into account for some luminaires where optics can be regulated<br />

(e.g. by changing the position of the lamp in the reflector or by changing inclination angle);<br />

those luminaires are identified in OM, CM or CH as stated below. Some softwares can calculate<br />

the most energy-economical position and consequently this position was applied. For some<br />

luminaires in OM and CM (partly) and for all luminaires in GO, GH, DR and OP, no regulation<br />

is possible and the standard position was applied.<br />

For the analysis of the performance parameters in this study, the following luminaire types are<br />

considered:<br />

• Globes with omni-directional diffuser (GO) (only in category S)<br />

• Globes or <strong>street</strong> lanterns with hemispherical diffuser (GH) (only in category S)<br />

• Decorative luminaire with reflector and no diffuser (DR) (only in category S)<br />

• Open luminaire with poor reflector (OP) (only in category S and M)<br />

• Open luminaire with medium reflector (OM)<br />

• Closed luminaire with medium reflector (CM)<br />

• Closed luminaire with advanced optic reflector (CH)<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!