Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat
Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat
Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mozambique<br />
Table 5-9a: Quantities (kg) <strong>of</strong> good quality cowpea seed produced at three locations in Mozambique in 2010<br />
Genotype<br />
Location<br />
Nampula Namialo Sussundenga Total<br />
IT-18 700 520 650 1,870<br />
IT00K-126-3 500 150 300 950<br />
IT97K-1069-6 400 250 140 790<br />
IT-16 950 720 - 1,670<br />
IT98K-390-2 150 140 - 290<br />
Total 2,700 1,780 1,090 5,570<br />
Tanzania<br />
Table 5-9b: Quantities (kg) <strong>of</strong> seed <strong>of</strong> the selected lines multiplied by participating farmers in Tanzania, 2010<br />
Cowpea line Iringa Dodoma Bahi Kongwa Total<br />
Uhominyi Mpunguzi Ilindi Mbande<br />
IT00K-1263 70 220 857 40 1187<br />
IT99K-1122 90 - 1040 20 1150<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> breeding lines <strong>for</strong> resistance to bacterial blight and viruses<br />
All the cowpea lines which seeds were multiplied and shared with NARS colleagues were tested in<br />
order to ascertain their resistance to bacterial blight and viruses in the greenhouse at Ibadan. The results<br />
showed that some <strong>of</strong> the lines are resistant to bacterial blight as well as virus diseases (see Table 5-10).<br />
Thirteen <strong>of</strong> the 50 breeding lines from <strong>II</strong>TA which included IT00K-1263, IT99K-1060, IT99K-1122 and<br />
IT99K-1111-1 were highly resistant to bacterial blight, an important cowpea disease. The local line<br />
Danila which is drought tolerant also showed high level <strong>of</strong> resistance to the disease.<br />
Table 5-10: Responses <strong>of</strong> some improved cowpea breeding lines to Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus;<br />
(CABMV), Cowpea mild mottle virus (CPMMV) and Cowpea mottle virus (CPMoV)<br />
*Genotype response to:<br />
Genotype<br />
CPMoV CABMV CPMMV<br />
IT98K-133-1-1 Early R R R<br />
IT99K-1122 Early R HS R<br />
IT98K-390-2 Striga R MR R<br />
IT98K-1092-1 Striga R MR R<br />
IT97K-1069-6 Medium R MR R<br />
IT04K-405-5 Dual R R MR<br />
IT00K-901-5 Early MR MR R<br />
IT98K-412-13 Dual MR MR R<br />
IT97K-819-118 Striga MR S MR<br />
IT99K-1060 Early S MR MR<br />
IT99K-573-1-1 Striga R R R<br />
*R = resistant (symptom score 0 to 1); MR = moderately resistant (symptom score 2); S = susceptible (symptom score 4); HS = highly<br />
susceptible (symptom score 5)<br />
Evaluation <strong>for</strong> phosphorus-use efficiency<br />
Greenhouse potted soil (a mixture <strong>of</strong> subsoil and acid-washed sand) experiment was conducted to<br />
evaluate variation in phosphorus use and response efficiency. Nodulation generally varied among<br />
genotypes and so was the response to phosphorus application. Nodulation was highest in dual purpose<br />
lines such as IT98K-166-44 but response to phosphorus application was higher in IT89KD-288<br />
than IT98K-166-44. There were highly significant (P≤0.001) genotype, phosphorus and genotype<br />
phosphorus effects on the utilization <strong>of</strong> P <strong>for</strong> shoot development. The genotype IT89KD-288 was the<br />
Progress <strong>of</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> 1<br />
99