20.01.2014 Views

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary, process gains and people reached<br />

Product gains<br />

TL <strong>II</strong> bean seed systems have made important advances in <strong>Phase</strong> I <strong>of</strong> the project. In terms <strong>of</strong> actual<br />

products, a notable amount <strong>of</strong> foundation seed has been produced, with NARS mainly overseeing<br />

the process. Also, a remarkable amount <strong>of</strong> decentralized seed production has taken place, with the<br />

latter accomplished by facilitating numerous and diversified partnerships. Important to highlight is<br />

that the varieties being promoted are doing unusually well on-farm (see Objective 4 & Objective 1<br />

results). The good per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> Katumani – common bean varieties, in general, has encouraged<br />

more investment in the bean sub sector. For instance, a new producer <strong>of</strong> certified seed, Lambwe Seed<br />

Growers Association, has been recently licensed by KEPHIS (the Kenya seed health sector). In addition,<br />

the Kenya Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (<strong>for</strong>tunately or un<strong>for</strong>tunately) has started supplying Katumani common<br />

bean varieties as relief seed in 61 districts across Kenya.<br />

Process gains<br />

Equally important are processes or innovation gains, which will extend well beyond the life <strong>of</strong> a special<br />

project, such as TL <strong>II</strong>. <strong>Phase</strong> I has shown that:<br />

• Women can be engaged in and benefit from seed production;<br />

• Cost-effective models <strong>for</strong> seed production are being implemented (caution: although vulnerable to<br />

drought)<br />

• Farmers, including women, will pay <strong>for</strong> certified seed; there is real demand!<br />

• Small pack marketing can be taken up by the private sector; (and is being taken up- especially in<br />

Kenya). The approach is also expanding across crops.<br />

• Seed loans are an effective mechanism <strong>for</strong> moving seed widely, including among those with<br />

limited financial means.<br />

• Seed loans <strong>of</strong>fer an alternative to emergency free seed distribution practice (and will be<br />

substituted in Eastern Kenya).<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these innovation gains can and should be built on more widely.<br />

People reached<br />

<strong>Final</strong>ly, in terms <strong>of</strong> documented impact, TL <strong>II</strong> common bean seed system has made an initial calculation <strong>of</strong><br />

people reached. These calculations have been derived from field data on initial seed produced, and then<br />

extrapolated using insights from known field processes. Our calculations may be on the modest side, <strong>for</strong><br />

three reasons. 1) We used the seed sharing rate <strong>of</strong> a) one farmer to one additional farmer after the first season<br />

<strong>of</strong> use and b) two additional farmers after two seasons. However, an MSc study on actual seed loan suggests<br />

that the average may be to five other farmers. 2) We have assumed that only 80% <strong>of</strong> farmers in Kenya and<br />

70% in Ethiopia distribute at all. 3) The data on reach has not been able to capture new variety and seed<br />

use that derives from local market purchase. (This may be a big gap). So we consider these calculations<br />

to be transparent, but provisional. The figures are likely to be higher. Table 6-8 shows the overall figures on<br />

reach: 1,099,736 people. Annex 6-3 shows the actual calculations and the underlying assumptions, again<br />

using Ethiopia as the example. It is important to note that only seed and reach directly achieved under the<br />

TL <strong>II</strong> project is reported. KARI and EIAR also have other projects, partners and impacts.<br />

Table 6-8: Farmers reached in <strong>Phase</strong> I<br />

Country<br />

Farmers reached<br />

Kenya 634,905<br />

Ethiopia 464,831<br />

Total 1,099,736<br />

126<br />

Engaging Smallholder Farmers | <strong>Tropical</strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>II</strong> <strong>Project</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!