Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3-2: Groundnut production trends in different agro-ecologies of Malawi Rural Development Program /Agricultural Development Division Area (Ha) 2005/06 2006/07 Yield Production Area (Ha) Yield (Kg per Ha) (MT) (Kg per Ha) Production (MT) Chitipa 3 078 671 2 064 3 548 693 2 458 Karonga 4 603 687 3 160 3 243 582 1 888 KARONGA 7 681 680 5 224 6 791 640 4 346 Rumphi/N/Rumphi RDP 1 937 834 1 615 1 655 1 263 2 090 C. Mzimba/Mzimba 24 185 659 15 933 24 864 876 21 774 S. Mzimba Nkhata Bay 2 003 771 1 545 2 628 861 2 264 Likoma MZUZU 28 125 679 19 093 29 147 896 26 128 Kasungu 16 170 462 7 475 18 830 941 17 717 Mchinji 23 524 1 209 28 446 28 629 1 315 37 658 Dowa West/Dowa RDP 15 043 916 13 773 15 342 1 022 15 673 Dowa East Ntchisi 4 740 704 3 335 5 378 1 022 5 499 KASUNGU 59 477 892 53 029 68 179 1 123 76 547 Lilongwe West/Lilongwe 35 481 941 33 380 55 020 1 159 63 789 Lilongwe East Thiwi/Lifidzi Dedza Hills/Dedza 17 147 970 16 634 19 179 1 100 21 093 Ntcheu 12 138 855 10 380 12 409 963 11 946 LILONGWE 64 766 932 60 394 86 608 1 118 96 828 Nkhotakota 3 890 881 3 427 4 877 915 4 463 Salima 4 658 783 3 649 5 127 844 4 326 Bwanje SALIMA 8 548 828 7 076 10 004 879 8 789 Mangochi 15 924 677 10 785 16 251 746 12 127 Namwera Kawinga/Machinga 7 764 622 4 829 7 919 723 5 726 Zomba 8 026 713 5 719 8 832 780 6 885 Balaka 2 269 661 1 499 2 623 777 2 037 MADD 33 983 672 22 832 35 625 752 26 775 Shire Highlands/Blantyre 5 943 932 5 541 6 254 1 063 6 650 Phalombe 6 518 980 6 385 6 633 1 130 7 492 Thyolo 3 931 619 2 432 4 156 737 3 062 Mulanje 4 238 719 3 049 4 400 818 3 601 Neno 504 546 275 1 018 686 698 Chiladzulo 1 920 612 1 175 1 884 815 1 536 Mwanza 2 276 799 1 818 2 481 937 2 324 BLANTYRE 25 330 816 20 675 26 826 945 25 363 Chikwawa 1 595 676 1 078 1 514 708 1 072 Nsanje 1 791 436 781 1 809 680 1 230 SHIRE VALLEY 3 386 549 1 859 3 323 693 2 302 Total 231 296 190 182 266 503 267 078 Source: Computed from NSO (2008) 36 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | Tropical Legumes II Project
For Tanzania data from 1990-2008 also show an upward trend both in terms of area under production and yield. Area under production increased almost four fold in 18 years (110,000 – 415,000 ha) whereas production increased 5-fold (60,000 to 300,000 MT). Yields have also been increasing though not as fast as it was in Malawi (545 to 723 kg per ha). There was a sharp decline in production and yield during 2000 that was caused by drought. Yields dropped to as low as 444 kg per ha but immediately bounced back to 836 kg per ha and 945 kg per ha during the following two consecutive seasons (Table 3-3). Table 3-3: Groundnut production trends in Tanzania Year Area (1000 Ha) Yield (Kg per Ha) Production (1000 MT) 1990 110 545 60 1991 110 636 70 1992 110 591 65 1993 110 636 70 1994 110 636 70 1995 113 637 72 1996 116 638 74 1997 116 621 72 1998 116 629 73 1999 116 638 74 2000 117 444 52 2001 247 836 207 2002 367 945 347 2003 348 459 160 2004 375 885 332 2005 409 718 294 2006 410 707 290 2007 415 723 300 2008 415 723 300 Source: Statistics Unit, Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives (MAFSC), Tanzania (2008). Progress of Phase 1 37
Page 1 and 2: Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
Page 3: TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
Page 6 and 7: Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 8 and 9: Seed production and delivery system
Page 10 and 11: NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
Page 12 and 13: TL II was implemented in 10 target
Page 14 and 15: country governments in agricultural
Page 16 and 17: Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
Page 18 and 19: Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
Page 20 and 21: As stated earlier in this chapter,
Page 22 and 23: Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
Page 24 and 25: Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
Page 26 and 27: Project background Groundnut is one
Page 28 and 29: Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
Page 30 and 31: Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
Page 32 and 33: Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
Page 34 and 35: Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
Page 36 and 37: Infrastructure facilities For effic
Page 38 and 39: Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
Page 40 and 41: In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
Page 42 and 43: Training course A total of four tra
Page 44 and 45: Background The yield of groundnut i
Page 48 and 49: In order of importance, the largest
Page 50 and 51: Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
Page 52 and 53: Finally, the variety choices are co
Page 54 and 55: hybridization techniques, design of
Page 56 and 57: Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
Page 58 and 59: Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
Page 60 and 61: Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
Page 62 and 63: Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
Page 64 and 65: 54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
Page 66 and 67: The European Union still remains th
Page 68 and 69: Table 4-2: Proportion of households
Page 70 and 71: Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
Page 72 and 73: Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
Page 74 and 75: The use of other inputs (credit, in
Page 76 and 77: A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
Page 78 and 79: Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
Page 80 and 81: Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
Page 82 and 83: 99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
Page 84 and 85: Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
Page 86 and 87: A 10-day intensive training worksho
Page 88 and 89: Seed production of all classes A to
Page 90 and 91: Testing seed marketing strategies A
Page 92 and 93: Area Global trends in area under co
Page 94 and 95: Figure 5-3 shows that Nigeria made
Page 96 and 97:
much greater deficits. Under this s
Page 98 and 99:
and other inputs. • Popular varie
Page 100 and 101:
Mozambique Soybean seed multiplicat
Page 102 and 103:
dry savanna regions, where the bulk
Page 104 and 105:
Number of demonstration plots in ea
Page 106 and 107:
Mozambique Many farmers have shown
Page 108 and 109:
Table 5-7: Number of days to flower
Page 110 and 111:
most efficient and IT99K-7-21-2-2 w
Page 112 and 113:
Table 5-11: Ten SNPs converted and
Page 114 and 115:
Strengthening capacity of national
Page 116 and 117:
Infrastructure development at NARS
Page 118 and 119:
in Mali, 107.3 MT in Mozambique, an
Page 120 and 121:
produced over the first phase of th
Page 122 and 123:
Lessons learned TL II cowpea seed s
Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
Page 134 and 135:
In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
Page 136 and 137:
Summary, process gains and people r
Page 138 and 139:
Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
Page 144 and 145:
Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
Page 146 and 147:
While the fast track entries were r
Page 148 and 149:
Technology generation Mechanistic s
Page 150 and 151:
60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
Page 152 and 153:
16, and the advantage of some ALB l
Page 154 and 155:
Number of degree training students
Page 156 and 157:
Number of NARS technicians trained
Page 158 and 159:
Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
Page 160 and 161:
Impact assessment and enhancement P
Page 162 and 163:
Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
Page 164 and 165:
154 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 166 and 167:
farmers for enhancing their awarene
Page 168 and 169:
• Designing, testing and implemen
Page 170 and 171:
Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
Page 172 and 173:
Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
Page 174 and 175:
Constraints in adoption of chickpea
Page 176 and 177:
Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
Page 178 and 179:
Identification of farmer-and-market
Page 180 and 181:
Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
Page 182 and 183:
Capacity building Knowledge empower
Page 184 and 185:
Table 7-15: Training of local seed
Page 186 and 187:
• In addition to yield, maturity
Page 188 and 189:
Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
Page 190 and 191:
Chickpea seed access The first majo
Page 192 and 193:
Grades and standards About 75% of t
Page 194 and 195:
Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
Page 196 and 197:
private sector lacks the incentive
Page 198 and 199:
• LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
Page 200 and 201:
• Establishing functional legume
Page 202 and 203:
Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
Page 204 and 205:
Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
Page 206 and 207:
Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
Page 208 and 209:
TL II focuses on farmer-participato
Page 210 and 211:
Production of Breeder, Foundation,
Page 212 and 213:
Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
Page 214 and 215:
(Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
Page 216 and 217:
Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
Page 218 and 219:
Available technologies Although imp
Page 220 and 221:
and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
Page 222 and 223:
Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
Page 224 and 225:
Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
Page 226 and 227:
Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
Page 228 and 229:
Adoption studies Adoption studies f
Page 230 and 231:
3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
Page 232 and 233:
Supply of important traits by the i
Page 234 and 235:
and marketing organization in Malaw
Page 236 and 237:
Table 11-3: Grain and fodder yields
Page 238 and 239:
Table 11-9: Communities and famers
Page 240 and 241:
Table 11-14 Average performance of
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Table 11-16: Soybean Breeder’s Se
Page 246 and 247:
Table 11-19: Grain yield (kg per ha
Page 248 and 249:
Table 11-23: F3 Segregating populat
Page 250 and 251:
At TSBF-CIAT in Kenya, a study was
Page 252 and 253:
Number of NARS scientists trained T
Page 254 and 255:
Improved access to markets Improved
Page 256 and 257:
Total 107.3 259.0 609.0 975.3 246 E
Page 258 and 259:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
Page 260 and 261:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
Page 262:
show all

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?