20.01.2014 Views

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Important variety traits to users<br />

The research carried out in phase 1 also revealed that genetic improvement to address production<br />

constraints mentioned above will have to take place while meeting numerous users’ preferred traits<br />

to facilitate significant adoption <strong>of</strong> varieties. Users (i.e. farmers, traders and consumers) along the<br />

value chains in both countries demand a diversity <strong>of</strong> variety traits. In Kenya, the top five demanded<br />

common bean traits by farmers across the regions are: better taste, early maturing, drought tolerance,<br />

high keeping quality and less cooking time. Some gender disparities were observed in ratings <strong>of</strong><br />

variety attribute preferences in Kenya. Majority <strong>of</strong> women rated preference <strong>for</strong> drought tolerance, early<br />

maturing, tolerance to poor soils, better taste, and less cooking time higher than men. On the other<br />

hand, majority <strong>of</strong> men rated preference <strong>for</strong> grain color higher than women. Men and women rating<br />

<strong>of</strong> their preferences coincided <strong>for</strong> six traits: pest and disease resistance, high keeping quality, low<br />

flatulence and grain size. In Ethiopia, market traits (i.e. seed color, seed size and seed shape) stand<br />

out among the top five demanded traits. Seed color and shape are currently the key attributes used to<br />

grade bean grain <strong>for</strong> export by the export promotion council. Because <strong>of</strong> this new development, these<br />

two variety characteristics are expected to be even more influential in variety choice in the near future<br />

and could change the current adoption patterns. Other traits rated among the top five were high yield<br />

and better taste. It is surprising that even in areas dominated by the export canning type; better taste is<br />

a desired trait.<br />

Supply <strong>of</strong> important traits by the improved varieties<br />

Preferences analysis in phase 1 showed that improved varieties demonstrate a high potential <strong>of</strong> being<br />

adopted if seed is made available. They are rated superior to local ones in most <strong>of</strong> the top demanded<br />

traits by users. For example, three improved varieties (i.e. KATB1, KATB9, and KATX56) in Kenya are<br />

rated superior to the local popular variety in the top demanded consumption traits (taste, less cooking<br />

time and high keeping quality). The varieties also have an advantage over local ones in addressing<br />

terminal drought because they are early maturing. In Kenya, the very short cycle (and other qualities)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Katumani bean varieties, has motivated farmers to plant three times in a single season, versus<br />

the normal one (<strong>for</strong> instance, in March, April and May) 1 . However, in terms <strong>of</strong> tolerance to intermittent<br />

drought, farmers do not perceive the three improved varieties to be different from the local variety,<br />

which could imply that they are equally vulnerable to this type <strong>of</strong> drought. Similarly, the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers in Ethiopia who have tried the improved varieties, released in 1990s and 2000s, on their farms<br />

expressed preference <strong>of</strong> these varieties over local ones (Mexican 142 or Chore ). Among the farmers<br />

who planted the varieties in East Shewa and West Arsi, over 80% would choose Awash 1 over local<br />

ones while 60% would chose Awash-Melka over local varieties. This demonstrates overall superiority<br />

<strong>of</strong> improved varieties over local ones within the current production environment. These preferences are<br />

subject to change with changes in the production and market environment and should be constantly<br />

monitored to in<strong>for</strong>m future crop improvement strategies.<br />

Baseline status <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> improved varieties - 2008<br />

Baseline survey data showed that a diversity <strong>of</strong> varieties exist at the community level in both Eastern<br />

Kenya and Ethiopia. About 15 varieties were identified in the sampled villages <strong>of</strong> each region, with<br />

the average number <strong>of</strong> varieties simultaneously grown per farm ranging from two in Eastern Kenya to<br />

1.47 in the Central Rift Valley in Ethiopia and one in the SNNPR, which is consistent with the available<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation that common bean diversity is comparatively low in Ethiopia than in Eastern Kenya. Varieties<br />

most frequently grown by farmers (percentage <strong>of</strong> households) were the same as the most widely planted<br />

(percentage <strong>of</strong> total seed sown per season). In Eastern Kenya, about 74% <strong>of</strong> the common bean area in<br />

the main cropping season was found to be occupied by large red mottled varieties (GLPx92 and GLP2)<br />

released way back in early 1980s and/or landraces (Annex 6-1). In the Central Rift Valley <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia,<br />

1 This strategy has resulted in three different harvests (via staggered planting), increased food availability and the spreading <strong>of</strong> risks in<br />

these unstable environments.<br />

Progress <strong>of</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> 1<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!