Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia groundnut varieties (kg per ha) at select research station sites in Tanzania (2009/10 season) Cultivar Naliendele Nachingwea Makutopra Mean CG 7 1303 1491 592 1129 ICGV-SM 01709 1162 1953 132 1082 ICGV-SM 01711 1663 1334 469 1155 ICGV-SM 01721 1586 1805 519 1303 ICGV-SM 05606 1731 1598 693 1341 ICGV-SM 06725 1706 813 232 917 ICGV-SM 90704 988 1453 283 908 Mean (20) 1465.45 1194.05 340 CV (%) 9.4 20.6 29 LSD 387.8 691.7 276.6 P=0.05 ** ** ** 50 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | Tropical Legumes II Project
Annex 3-3: Regional elite groundnut variety trial-Virginia Bunch (Chitedze Research Station, Malawi) 2009/10 Season Cultivar name Final plant stand Pod yield (kg per ha) Kernel yield (kg per ha) yield % of ICGV- SM90704 Haulm yield (kg per ha) Days to 75% flowering %wt on sieve 19 % wt on sieve 15 ELS 1 ELS 2 Shelling percentage CG 7 74 3421 2764 149 1975 43 71.88 87.16 2 3 81.94 79.5 100 seed mass (g) Chalimbana 2005 60 2649 2058 111 1480 46 80.1 85.4 2 3 78.09 65.71 ICGV-SM 01709 62 2680 2195 118 1225 45 47.27 81.79 2 3 81.89 55.48 ICGV-SM 01711 69 2883 2398 129 1453 46 63.06 82.57 2 3 82.66 61.18 ICGV-SM 01721 60 2987 2515 136 1290 43 76.25 83.49 2 3 83.63 72.09 ICGV-SM 01731 71 2523 1910 103 1257 46 68.21 82.34 2 3 75.98 62.87 ICGV-SM 02712 51 2641 1951 105 1658 48 57.19 78.94 1 3 74.66 54.6 ICGV-SM 02724 63 2843 2320 125 1323 48 64.21 83.92 1 2 80.5 59.5 ICGV-SM 03590 64 2617 2149 116 1477 47 36.43 77.03 1 3 81.23 57.7 ICGV-SM 03707 61 1868 1468 79 1828 39 56.39 79.82 3 3 78.81 49.61 ICGV-SM 03708 58 2957 2377 128 1134 50 68.6 82.07 2 3 80.17 62.36 ICGV-SM 03709 51 2527 1854 100 264 40 58.98 80.2 2 3 74.11 61.35 ICGV-SM 03710 36 1779 1450 78 1984 55 62.04 80.01 3 4 77.61 56.15 ICGV-SM 05558 60 2684 2131 115 1367 40 58.86 82 2 3 79.2 59.88 ICGV-SM 05582 45 1738 1343 72 1277 46 53.7 80.63 2 3 78.3 55.09 ICGV-SM 05606 51 2426 1939 105 1774 44 67.18 83.2 1 4 80.7 66.48 ICGV-SM 05693 57 3216 2596 140 1512 47 70.06 84.45 2 3 79.77 66.83 ICGV-SM 06725 55 2736 2273 123 503 43 66.4 82.09 2 3 82.76 61.86 ICGV-SM 07593 49 2609 2199 119 1901 47 54.43 84.91 3 4 85.1 75.84 ICGV-SM 90704 59 2426 1853 100 623 44 40.28 76.53 2 3 76.39 52.26 Grand Mean 58 2610.5 2087.15 1365.25 45.25 61.076 81.9275 1.875 3.2249 79.675 61.817 FPr 0.02 0.664 0.651 0.62 0.143 0.016 0.048 0.157 0.953 0.352 0.024 CV (%) 12.02 23.55 25.77 47.38 6.09 13.11 2.7 28.58 26.59 4.64 8.77 SED 8.217 728.2 637 766.1 3.266 9.485 2.619 0.6348 1.0155 4.376 6.423 Progress of Phase 1 51
Page 1 and 2:
Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
Page 3:
TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
Page 6 and 7:
Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 8 and 9:
Seed production and delivery system
Page 10 and 11: NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
Page 12 and 13: TL II was implemented in 10 target
Page 14 and 15: country governments in agricultural
Page 16 and 17: Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
Page 18 and 19: Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
Page 20 and 21: As stated earlier in this chapter,
Page 22 and 23: Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
Page 24 and 25: Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
Page 26 and 27: Project background Groundnut is one
Page 28 and 29: Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
Page 30 and 31: Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
Page 32 and 33: Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
Page 34 and 35: Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
Page 36 and 37: Infrastructure facilities For effic
Page 38 and 39: Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
Page 40 and 41: In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
Page 42 and 43: Training course A total of four tra
Page 44 and 45: Background The yield of groundnut i
Page 46 and 47: Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
Page 48 and 49: In order of importance, the largest
Page 50 and 51: Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
Page 52 and 53: Finally, the variety choices are co
Page 54 and 55: hybridization techniques, design of
Page 56 and 57: Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
Page 58 and 59: Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
Page 62 and 63: Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
Page 64 and 65: 54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
Page 66 and 67: The European Union still remains th
Page 68 and 69: Table 4-2: Proportion of households
Page 70 and 71: Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
Page 72 and 73: Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
Page 74 and 75: The use of other inputs (credit, in
Page 76 and 77: A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
Page 78 and 79: Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
Page 80 and 81: Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
Page 82 and 83: 99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
Page 84 and 85: Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
Page 86 and 87: A 10-day intensive training worksho
Page 88 and 89: Seed production of all classes A to
Page 90 and 91: Testing seed marketing strategies A
Page 92 and 93: Area Global trends in area under co
Page 94 and 95: Figure 5-3 shows that Nigeria made
Page 96 and 97: much greater deficits. Under this s
Page 98 and 99: and other inputs. • Popular varie
Page 100 and 101: Mozambique Soybean seed multiplicat
Page 102 and 103: dry savanna regions, where the bulk
Page 104 and 105: Number of demonstration plots in ea
Page 106 and 107: Mozambique Many farmers have shown
Page 108 and 109: Table 5-7: Number of days to flower
Page 110 and 111:
most efficient and IT99K-7-21-2-2 w
Page 112 and 113:
Table 5-11: Ten SNPs converted and
Page 114 and 115:
Strengthening capacity of national
Page 116 and 117:
Infrastructure development at NARS
Page 118 and 119:
in Mali, 107.3 MT in Mozambique, an
Page 120 and 121:
produced over the first phase of th
Page 122 and 123:
Lessons learned TL II cowpea seed s
Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
Page 134 and 135:
In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
Page 136 and 137:
Summary, process gains and people r
Page 138 and 139:
Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
Page 144 and 145:
Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
Page 146 and 147:
While the fast track entries were r
Page 148 and 149:
Technology generation Mechanistic s
Page 150 and 151:
60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
Page 152 and 153:
16, and the advantage of some ALB l
Page 154 and 155:
Number of degree training students
Page 156 and 157:
Number of NARS technicians trained
Page 158 and 159:
Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
Page 160 and 161:
Impact assessment and enhancement P
Page 162 and 163:
Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
Page 164 and 165:
154 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 166 and 167:
farmers for enhancing their awarene
Page 168 and 169:
• Designing, testing and implemen
Page 170 and 171:
Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
Page 172 and 173:
Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
Page 174 and 175:
Constraints in adoption of chickpea
Page 176 and 177:
Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
Page 178 and 179:
Identification of farmer-and-market
Page 180 and 181:
Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
Page 182 and 183:
Capacity building Knowledge empower
Page 184 and 185:
Table 7-15: Training of local seed
Page 186 and 187:
• In addition to yield, maturity
Page 188 and 189:
Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
Page 190 and 191:
Chickpea seed access The first majo
Page 192 and 193:
Grades and standards About 75% of t
Page 194 and 195:
Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
Page 196 and 197:
private sector lacks the incentive
Page 198 and 199:
• LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
Page 200 and 201:
• Establishing functional legume
Page 202 and 203:
Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
Page 204 and 205:
Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
Page 206 and 207:
Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
Page 208 and 209:
TL II focuses on farmer-participato
Page 210 and 211:
Production of Breeder, Foundation,
Page 212 and 213:
Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
Page 214 and 215:
(Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
Page 216 and 217:
Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
Page 218 and 219:
Available technologies Although imp
Page 220 and 221:
and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
Page 222 and 223:
Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
Page 224 and 225:
Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
Page 226 and 227:
Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
Page 228 and 229:
Adoption studies Adoption studies f
Page 230 and 231:
3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
Page 232 and 233:
Supply of important traits by the i
Page 234 and 235:
and marketing organization in Malaw
Page 236 and 237:
Table 11-3: Grain and fodder yields
Page 238 and 239:
Table 11-9: Communities and famers
Page 240 and 241:
Table 11-14 Average performance of
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Table 11-16: Soybean Breeder’s Se
Page 246 and 247:
Table 11-19: Grain yield (kg per ha
Page 248 and 249:
Table 11-23: F3 Segregating populat
Page 250 and 251:
At TSBF-CIAT in Kenya, a study was
Page 252 and 253:
Number of NARS scientists trained T
Page 254 and 255:
Improved access to markets Improved
Page 256 and 257:
Total 107.3 259.0 609.0 975.3 246 E
Page 258 and 259:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
Page 260 and 261:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
Page 262:
show all

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?