Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred varieties identified from mother trials in Maharashtra Village, District Preferred varieties I II III Kanzara, Akola Maruti (84.0) BSMR-736 (72.0) ICPH-2671 (28.0) KVK Durgapur, Akola Maruti (89.7) PKV Trom. Tur (81.0) Vipula (60.3) Nipana, Akola No data No data No data Shelu-Khadase, Washim Maruti (82.6) Vipula (60.9) BSMR-736 (54.4) Shelgaon-Ingole, Washim PKV Tara (90.6) Vipula (77.4) AKT-8811 (58.5) KVK Karda, Washim Maruti (90.5) Vipula (73.8) ICPH-2671 (63.1) Note: Figures in parentheses indicate percent preference Table 9-2: Mother trials conducted in AP Location Cultivar Disease incidence (%) Insect incidence Yield Phytopthora Blight Fusarium Wilt SMD Helicoverpa armigera Maruca (kg per ha) Kodangal, Asha, None None None Negligible Negligible 960 Asha, Mahaboobnagar Naacharam, Mahaboobnagar Parvathpally. Ranga Reddy Tandur, Ranga Reddy Maruti, None None 25 Negligible Negligible 800 Lakshmi, None 20 30 Negligible Negligible 700 PRG 158 None 10 40 Negligible Negligible 720 LRG 41 None 20 25 Negligible Negligible 820 Preferred varieties ICPH 2671 ICPH None None no Negligible Negligible 970 2671 Local None 20 25 Negligible Negligible 600 Asha None None None Negligible Negligible 1120 PRG Maruthi None None None Negligible Negligible 1100 Lakshmi None 10 None Negligible Negligible 950 PRG 158 None None None Negligible Negligible 1120 LRG 41 None None None Negligible Negligible 1070 ICPH 2671 None None None Negligible Negligible 550 Local None 20 None Negligible Negligible 500 158, Maruti, Asha Asha, None None None Negligible Negligible 1230 Asha, Maruti, None None None Negligible Negligible 1050 ICPH Lakshmi, None 10 25 Negligible Negligible 970 2671 PRG 158 None no 35 Negligible Negligible 1160 LRG 41 None 40 25 Negligible Negligible 1010 ICPH None 5 10 Negligible Negligible 1245 2671 Local None 60 60 Negligible Negligible 780 Asha None None None Negligible Negligible 1350 Asha Maruti None None 25 Negligible Negligible 875 Lakshmi None 10 30 Negligible Negligible 920 PRG 158 None None 40 Negligible Negligible 960 LRG 41 None 40 25 Negligible Negligible 870 ICPH 50 None None Negligible Negligible 800 2671 Local None 60 60 Negligible Negligible 600 192 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | Tropical Legumes II Project
Baby trials A total of 91 trials were conducted in intercropping systems under rain-fed conditions at Vidharba region (6 trial x 4 village x 2 resource divisions x 2 districts) of Maharashtra. Six trials in each of the 15 selected villages of two districts (Shelu-Khadse, Bhokarkheda, Sawad, Chinchamba Pen, Shelgaon- Ingole, Karanji, Dudhala, Borala, Kurum, Kanzara, Hirpur, Sirso, Agar, Nipana and Sukli-Khurd). ICP- 8863 (Maruti) was used as a standard check in all these trials. Of the total 91 trials conducted, 18 trials were located in Akola taluk, three in Murtizapur taluk, four in Risodtaluk and three in Malegaon taluk failed for various reasons such as erratic and sporadic rainfall at project locations, long dry spell of 22- 25 days after the emergence of the crop, poor management practices and lack of irrigation facilities at farmers fields. Results showed that farmers’ preferences differed by location; however, wherever ICPH 2671 and Asha is planted, these varieties were preferred by farmers (Table 9-3). In AP, Asha and ICPH 2671 were identified by farmers as the preferred varieties due to high yield and resistance to pests and diseases as shown in Table 9-4. Screening breeding lines against drought Forty eight breeding lines were received from ICRISAT and planted at Pulses Research Unit, Dr. PDKV, Akola, and Maharashtra. The varieties Asha, BSMR-736, Vipula, Maruti and BDN-708 were preferred by farmers in different villages. The sample of 1 kg seed of these varieties was distributed to 240 farmers in seven villages of Akola and Washim districts for multiplication. The preference of these lines is presented in Table 9-5. Among these lines, ICPB-2043, ICPB-2092, ICPL-20108, and ICPL-150 were found superior in respect of yield, wilt and SMD. In terms of reaction to SMD, the incidence was recorded in the range of 0.0 to 84.6% with susceptible SMD infection ICPB 2043, ICPB 2092 showed highly resistant reaction against SMD. Seed Production and Delivery Systems Summary A total of 141.67 MT seed of various categories (Breeder, Foundation, Certified, and Truthfully Labeled) was produced by NARS in Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. The Certified and TL seed production program of farmer-preferred varieties in Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh was undertaken at village level. The concept of ‘one village-one variety’ was successfully promoted in Gorvha village in Akola district in Maharashtra with variety ICP 8863 (Maruti). However, this concept could not be implemented successfully in other villages (Tiptala in Akola district and Karanji, Shelgaon Omkargir and Sukanda in Washim district) in spite of conducting the promotional meetings due to the reason such as pigeonpea intercrop with cotton was not permitted for seed certification (by seed certification agency), different varieties are supplied under production management packages and farmers were reluctant in executing the Certified Seed production program. To facilitate efficient seed production and marketing, PDKV-Akola established linkages with Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation Limited (MSSCL) and Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) at Karda and Durgapura. In Andhra Pradesh, ANGRAU-Hyderabad established linkages with Andhra Pradesh State Seed Development Cooperation (APSSDC) and Adarsh Rythu for the efficient seed diffusion. The involvement of APSSDC and Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certifying Agency (APSSCA) in roguing, inspection and selection, and certification of farmers’ seed production fields ensured the purity and quality of pigeonpea seed. However, in Maharashtra, there is a need to strengthen informal seed sector through the approach of ‘seed village concept’ where ‘one village- one variety’ strategy should be popularized because formal seed sector cannot lead to supply huge quantity of quality seed. Progress of Phase 1 193
Page 1 and 2:
Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
Page 3:
TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
Page 6 and 7:
Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 8 and 9:
Seed production and delivery system
Page 10 and 11:
NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
Page 12 and 13:
TL II was implemented in 10 target
Page 14 and 15:
country governments in agricultural
Page 16 and 17:
Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
Page 18 and 19:
Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
Page 20 and 21:
As stated earlier in this chapter,
Page 22 and 23:
Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
Page 24 and 25:
Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
Page 26 and 27:
Project background Groundnut is one
Page 28 and 29:
Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
Page 30 and 31:
Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
Page 32 and 33:
Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
Page 34 and 35:
Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
Page 36 and 37:
Infrastructure facilities For effic
Page 38 and 39:
Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
Page 40 and 41:
In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
Page 42 and 43:
Training course A total of four tra
Page 44 and 45:
Background The yield of groundnut i
Page 46 and 47:
Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
Page 48 and 49:
In order of importance, the largest
Page 50 and 51:
Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
Page 52 and 53:
Finally, the variety choices are co
Page 54 and 55:
hybridization techniques, design of
Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
Page 58 and 59:
Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
Page 60 and 61:
Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
Page 62 and 63:
Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
Page 64 and 65:
54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
Page 66 and 67:
The European Union still remains th
Page 68 and 69:
Table 4-2: Proportion of households
Page 70 and 71:
Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
Page 72 and 73:
Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
Page 74 and 75:
The use of other inputs (credit, in
Page 76 and 77:
A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
Page 78 and 79:
Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
Page 80 and 81:
Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
Page 82 and 83:
99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
Page 84 and 85:
Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
Page 86 and 87:
A 10-day intensive training worksho
Page 88 and 89:
Seed production of all classes A to
Page 90 and 91:
Testing seed marketing strategies A
Page 92 and 93:
Area Global trends in area under co
Page 94 and 95:
Figure 5-3 shows that Nigeria made
Page 96 and 97:
much greater deficits. Under this s
Page 98 and 99:
and other inputs. • Popular varie
Page 100 and 101:
Mozambique Soybean seed multiplicat
Page 102 and 103:
dry savanna regions, where the bulk
Page 104 and 105:
Number of demonstration plots in ea
Page 106 and 107:
Mozambique Many farmers have shown
Page 108 and 109:
Table 5-7: Number of days to flower
Page 110 and 111:
most efficient and IT99K-7-21-2-2 w
Page 112 and 113:
Table 5-11: Ten SNPs converted and
Page 114 and 115:
Strengthening capacity of national
Page 116 and 117:
Infrastructure development at NARS
Page 118 and 119:
in Mali, 107.3 MT in Mozambique, an
Page 120 and 121:
produced over the first phase of th
Page 122 and 123:
Lessons learned TL II cowpea seed s
Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
Page 134 and 135:
In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
Page 136 and 137:
Summary, process gains and people r
Page 138 and 139:
Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
Page 144 and 145:
Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
Page 146 and 147:
While the fast track entries were r
Page 148 and 149:
Technology generation Mechanistic s
Page 150 and 151:
60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
Page 152 and 153: 16, and the advantage of some ALB l
Page 154 and 155: Number of degree training students
Page 156 and 157: Number of NARS technicians trained
Page 158 and 159: Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
Page 160 and 161: Impact assessment and enhancement P
Page 162 and 163: Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
Page 164 and 165: 154 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 166 and 167: farmers for enhancing their awarene
Page 168 and 169: • Designing, testing and implemen
Page 170 and 171: Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
Page 172 and 173: Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
Page 174 and 175: Constraints in adoption of chickpea
Page 176 and 177: Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
Page 178 and 179: Identification of farmer-and-market
Page 180 and 181: Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
Page 182 and 183: Capacity building Knowledge empower
Page 184 and 185: Table 7-15: Training of local seed
Page 186 and 187: • In addition to yield, maturity
Page 188 and 189: Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
Page 190 and 191: Chickpea seed access The first majo
Page 192 and 193: Grades and standards About 75% of t
Page 194 and 195: Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
Page 196 and 197: private sector lacks the incentive
Page 198 and 199: • LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
Page 200 and 201: • Establishing functional legume
Page 204 and 205: Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
Page 206 and 207: Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
Page 208 and 209: TL II focuses on farmer-participato
Page 210 and 211: Production of Breeder, Foundation,
Page 212 and 213: Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
Page 214 and 215: (Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
Page 216 and 217: Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
Page 218 and 219: Available technologies Although imp
Page 220 and 221: and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
Page 222 and 223: Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
Page 224 and 225: Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
Page 226 and 227: Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
Page 228 and 229: Adoption studies Adoption studies f
Page 230 and 231: 3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
Page 232 and 233: Supply of important traits by the i
Page 234 and 235: and marketing organization in Malaw
Page 236 and 237: Table 11-3: Grain and fodder yields
Page 238 and 239: Table 11-9: Communities and famers
Page 240 and 241: Table 11-14 Average performance of
Page 242 and 243: 232 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 244 and 245: Table 11-16: Soybean Breeder’s Se
Page 246 and 247: Table 11-19: Grain yield (kg per ha
Page 248 and 249: Table 11-23: F3 Segregating populat
Page 250 and 251: At TSBF-CIAT in Kenya, a study was
Page 252 and 253:
Number of NARS scientists trained T
Page 254 and 255:
Improved access to markets Improved
Page 256 and 257:
Total 107.3 259.0 609.0 975.3 246 E
Page 258 and 259:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
Page 260 and 261:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
Page 262:
252 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
show all

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?