Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 91114 in large-scale yield testing trials conducted during 2010 rainy season in Chitradurga, Tumkur, and Chikballpur districts of Karnataka No. Village name Yield (kg per ha) ( average yield of 10 trails/village) ICGV-91114 TMV-2 (check) % yield increase over check 1 Gulya 850 680 20 2 GulyaGollarahtati 820 656 19 3 Hariyabbe 910 728 21 4 T-Gollahalli 950 760 22 5 Hariyabbepalya 830 664 19 6 V.K.Gudda 820 656 19 7 Hirehalli 780 624 18 8 Chikkahalli 760 608 18 9 Rudrammanahalli 900 720 21 10 Siddapura 880 704 21 11 Laxmipura 720 562 19 12 Hottappanahalli 810 632 21 13 Kondlahalli 770 601 20 14 Nerlahalli 830 647 21 15 Marammanahalli 800 624 21 16 Mogalahalli 720 562 19 17 Konasagara 750 585 19 18 B.G.Kere 770 601 20 19 Maruru 830 647 21 20 Hosahalli 850 663 22. 21 Jangamarahalli 900 684 25 22 Arasikere 880 669 25 23 Mangalawada 720 547 20 24 Budusanahalli 960 730 27 25 Dwaranakunte 830 631 23 26 Nejanti 750 570 21 27 Vajarahalli 780 593 22 28 Chinnahalli 940 714 26 29 Battalahalli 910 692 25 30 Karigatammanahalli 860 654 24 31 Mittemari 700 532 20 32 Kanagamakalapalli 760 578 21 33 Burugamadugu 810 616 23 Mean 823 640 21 20 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | Tropical Legumes II Project
Table 2-7: Performance of varieties in PVS trials conducted during 2008 rainy season in Bagalkot district of Karnataka No. Variety Mean pod yield Traders’ Rating (kg per ha) Good Medium Poor 1 GPBD4 2469 15 0 0 2 DH86 1933 0 1 17 3 R 2001-3 4344 0 18 0 4 DH 101 2114 0 17 1 5 DH 4-3 2196 1 16 0 6 ICGV 91114 1097 18 0 1 7 ICGV 00350 2996 1 0 18 8 R 2001-2 2976 0 1 17 9 TMV2 (check) 919 18 0 0 Table 2-8: Performance of varieties in PVS trials conducted during 2009 rainy season in Bagalkot district of Karnataka Variety Mean pod yield (kg per ha) Badami (2 village 10 farmers) Bagalkot (2 villages 6 farmers) Bilagi (3 villages 4 farmers) Mean (7 villages 20 farmers) GPBD4 1664 2077 1869 1828 R 2001-3 1673 2670 2937 2238 DH 4-3 1059 1543 1469 1282 ICGV 00350 1655 2700 2670 2170 R 2001-2 1413 2225 1958 1752 TMV2 (Check) 899 1643 1380 1205 MEAN 1394 2143 2047 1746 CD @5% 138 292 606 314 CV % 11.0 11.5 19.6 12.0 Table 2-9: Performance of ICGV 00350 during 2010 rainy season in Bagalkot district of Karnataka Taluk No. of trials ICGV 00350 TMV 2 Calculated t % increase Badami 76 1482 ± 76 1028 ± 67 39.10** 44.20 Bagalkot 102 1482 ± 80 1039 ± 69 42.29** 42.60 Bilagi 14 1478 ± 80 1057 ± 76 14.31** 39.80 Total 192 1482 ± 78 1036 ± 69 59.37** 43.00 Table 2-10: Performance of baby trial varieties in PVS trials conducted during the 2010 rainy season in Raichur district of Karnataka No. Entry Yield (kg per ha) Raichur Deodurga Lingasugur Mean 1 GPBD-4 925 854 833 871 2 R-2001-3 1344 1112 1179 1212 3 Dh-4-3 825 767 804 799 4 ICGV-91114 913 917 979 936 5 ICGV-00350 1456 1163 1425 1348 6 R-2001-2 1367 1183 1250 1267 7 Local check 959 890 964 937 CV (%) 6.2 CD at 5% 116.0 Progress of Phase 1 21
Page 1 and 2: Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
Page 3: TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
Page 6 and 7: Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 8 and 9: Seed production and delivery system
Page 10 and 11: NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
Page 12 and 13: TL II was implemented in 10 target
Page 14 and 15: country governments in agricultural
Page 16 and 17: Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
Page 18 and 19: Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
Page 20 and 21: As stated earlier in this chapter,
Page 22 and 23: Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
Page 24 and 25: Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
Page 26 and 27: Project background Groundnut is one
Page 28 and 29: Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
Page 32 and 33: Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
Page 34 and 35: Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
Page 36 and 37: Infrastructure facilities For effic
Page 38 and 39: Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
Page 40 and 41: In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
Page 42 and 43: Training course A total of four tra
Page 44 and 45: Background The yield of groundnut i
Page 46 and 47: Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
Page 48 and 49: In order of importance, the largest
Page 50 and 51: Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
Page 52 and 53: Finally, the variety choices are co
Page 54 and 55: hybridization techniques, design of
Page 56 and 57: Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
Page 58 and 59: Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
Page 60 and 61: Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
Page 62 and 63: Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
Page 64 and 65: 54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
Page 66 and 67: The European Union still remains th
Page 68 and 69: Table 4-2: Proportion of households
Page 70 and 71: Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
Page 72 and 73: Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
Page 74 and 75: The use of other inputs (credit, in
Page 76 and 77: A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
Page 78 and 79: Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
Page 80 and 81:
Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
Page 82 and 83:
99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
Page 84 and 85:
Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
Page 86 and 87:
A 10-day intensive training worksho
Page 88 and 89:
Seed production of all classes A to
Page 90 and 91:
Testing seed marketing strategies A
Page 92 and 93:
Area Global trends in area under co
Page 94 and 95:
Figure 5-3 shows that Nigeria made
Page 96 and 97:
much greater deficits. Under this s
Page 98 and 99:
and other inputs. • Popular varie
Page 100 and 101:
Mozambique Soybean seed multiplicat
Page 102 and 103:
dry savanna regions, where the bulk
Page 104 and 105:
Number of demonstration plots in ea
Page 106 and 107:
Mozambique Many farmers have shown
Page 108 and 109:
Table 5-7: Number of days to flower
Page 110 and 111:
most efficient and IT99K-7-21-2-2 w
Page 112 and 113:
Table 5-11: Ten SNPs converted and
Page 114 and 115:
Strengthening capacity of national
Page 116 and 117:
Infrastructure development at NARS
Page 118 and 119:
in Mali, 107.3 MT in Mozambique, an
Page 120 and 121:
produced over the first phase of th
Page 122 and 123:
Lessons learned TL II cowpea seed s
Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
Page 134 and 135:
In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
Page 136 and 137:
Summary, process gains and people r
Page 138 and 139:
Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
Page 144 and 145:
Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
Page 146 and 147:
While the fast track entries were r
Page 148 and 149:
Technology generation Mechanistic s
Page 150 and 151:
60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
Page 152 and 153:
16, and the advantage of some ALB l
Page 154 and 155:
Number of degree training students
Page 156 and 157:
Number of NARS technicians trained
Page 158 and 159:
Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
Page 160 and 161:
Impact assessment and enhancement P
Page 162 and 163:
Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
Page 164 and 165:
154 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 166 and 167:
farmers for enhancing their awarene
Page 168 and 169:
• Designing, testing and implemen
Page 170 and 171:
Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
Page 172 and 173:
Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
Page 174 and 175:
Constraints in adoption of chickpea
Page 176 and 177:
Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
Page 178 and 179:
Identification of farmer-and-market
Page 180 and 181:
Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
Page 182 and 183:
Capacity building Knowledge empower
Page 184 and 185:
Table 7-15: Training of local seed
Page 186 and 187:
• In addition to yield, maturity
Page 188 and 189:
Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
Page 190 and 191:
Chickpea seed access The first majo
Page 192 and 193:
Grades and standards About 75% of t
Page 194 and 195:
Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
Page 196 and 197:
private sector lacks the incentive
Page 198 and 199:
• LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
Page 200 and 201:
• Establishing functional legume
Page 202 and 203:
Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
Page 204 and 205:
Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
Page 206 and 207:
Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
Page 208 and 209:
TL II focuses on farmer-participato
Page 210 and 211:
Production of Breeder, Foundation,
Page 212 and 213:
Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
Page 214 and 215:
(Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
Page 216 and 217:
Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
Page 218 and 219:
Available technologies Although imp
Page 220 and 221:
and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
Page 222 and 223:
Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
Page 224 and 225:
Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
Page 226 and 227:
Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
Page 228 and 229:
Adoption studies Adoption studies f
Page 230 and 231:
3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
Page 232 and 233:
Supply of important traits by the i
Page 234 and 235:
and marketing organization in Malaw
Page 236 and 237:
Table 11-3: Grain and fodder yields
Page 238 and 239:
Table 11-9: Communities and famers
Page 240 and 241:
Table 11-14 Average performance of
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Table 11-16: Soybean Breeder’s Se
Page 246 and 247:
Table 11-19: Grain yield (kg per ha
Page 248 and 249:
Table 11-23: F3 Segregating populat
Page 250 and 251:
At TSBF-CIAT in Kenya, a study was
Page 252 and 253:
Number of NARS scientists trained T
Page 254 and 255:
Improved access to markets Improved
Page 256 and 257:
Total 107.3 259.0 609.0 975.3 246 E
Page 258 and 259:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
Page 260 and 261:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
Page 262:
show all

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?