Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat
Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat
Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mapping (GIS) seed outlets<br />
Related to marketing - and to reach 100,000s farmers in general, a complementary project (Nodes<br />
<strong>of</strong> Growth, leveraged on TL <strong>II</strong> ) mapped the distribution <strong>of</strong> seed outlets in key drought-prone zones <strong>of</strong><br />
Kenya. Such maps help to identify areas where there is a lack <strong>of</strong> coverage.<br />
Starting with Nzaui district in Kenya, the map showed that just over 23% <strong>of</strong> the population is reached<br />
within 1- hour walk <strong>of</strong> the current seven outlets. If one new outlet were added, the population within<br />
1-hour reach rises to 38%. A further seven new outlets would have to be added to ensure that 80%<br />
<strong>of</strong> our target population has access to seed outlets. So, in brief, the current placement <strong>of</strong> agro-dealers<br />
suggests that they can serve only a small portion <strong>of</strong> the population in this particular drought-prone<br />
zone. To reach a broader segment, either more outlets have to be added, or alternative mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />
supply have to be encouraged (such as at open markets).<br />
Select monitoring and evaluation issues<br />
An Integrated Per<strong>for</strong>mance Monitoring and Evaluation (IPME ) framework has been built into project<br />
operations at varied levels—with the decentralized partners, the NARS, and overall with PABRA/<br />
CIAT. Routine data on seed produced, distributed, and sold is collected, along with insights on who<br />
is being reached and where. In addition, specialized M+E is being conducted on the costs <strong>of</strong> seed<br />
production, and on the quality <strong>of</strong> seed being produced by different organizations.<br />
Cost-benefit analysis <strong>of</strong> decentralized production models<br />
Seven models were costed and their advantages and disadvantages analyzed during <strong>Phase</strong> I. The<br />
focus has been on Kenya—and included one public sector organization, two private companies, and<br />
four decentralized means <strong>of</strong> production (facilitated by individuals, communities, and NGO and the<br />
government sector, respectively). Producing common bean seed proves pr<strong>of</strong>itable whether the product<br />
is certified or <strong>of</strong> ‘other quality’, but the magnitude <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it is highly linked to yield. Currently, all modes<br />
are vulnerable to the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> drought.<br />
Seed quality monitoring<br />
Seed quality assessment research was conducted in both countries comparing samples obtained from<br />
varied <strong>for</strong>mal and in<strong>for</strong>mal seed sector sources.<br />
In Kenya, seed was collected from trained seed bulking farmers, farmers who were secondary<br />
beneficiaries, and seed companies and parastatals involved with seed. The data from 91 farmer<br />
beneficiaries (74% women), randomly sampled across TL <strong>II</strong> sites, proved <strong>of</strong> particular interest. Data<br />
analysis showed that 81% <strong>of</strong> farmers’ sorted seeds were <strong>of</strong> good physical quality (according to ISTA<br />
standards), with a germination <strong>of</strong> 86.7%, and with very good vigor.<br />
In Ethiopia, 169 bean seed samples were collected from the Oromia and SNNPRS regions, including<br />
seed samples obtained from the <strong>for</strong>mal seed sector (seed companies, famers’ cooperatives unions and<br />
research centers) and local markets in the areas <strong>of</strong> project intervention. Physical purity proved relatively<br />
good across samples, ranging from 89.2% to 100 % with a mean <strong>of</strong> 97.5%. Germination percentage<br />
showed a greater range, between 68 and 97.3 with a mean <strong>of</strong> 78.9%. Seed health testing was also<br />
conducted <strong>for</strong> the two most important common bean bacterial pathogens; Xanthomonas campestris pv.<br />
phaseoli and Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. In terms <strong>of</strong> the in<strong>for</strong>mal sector, some common<br />
bean growers had produced seed <strong>of</strong> considerably better quality than others. There were cases where<br />
seeds obtained from the <strong>for</strong>mal sector fell below the minimum standards. Hence, the results showed<br />
that there was no evidence to assume that seeds from the decentralized seed system are inferior to that<br />
<strong>of</strong> the seed from the <strong>for</strong>mal sector.<br />
Progress <strong>of</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> 1<br />
125