20.01.2014 Views

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mapping (GIS) seed outlets<br />

Related to marketing - and to reach 100,000s farmers in general, a complementary project (Nodes<br />

<strong>of</strong> Growth, leveraged on TL <strong>II</strong> ) mapped the distribution <strong>of</strong> seed outlets in key drought-prone zones <strong>of</strong><br />

Kenya. Such maps help to identify areas where there is a lack <strong>of</strong> coverage.<br />

Starting with Nzaui district in Kenya, the map showed that just over 23% <strong>of</strong> the population is reached<br />

within 1- hour walk <strong>of</strong> the current seven outlets. If one new outlet were added, the population within<br />

1-hour reach rises to 38%. A further seven new outlets would have to be added to ensure that 80%<br />

<strong>of</strong> our target population has access to seed outlets. So, in brief, the current placement <strong>of</strong> agro-dealers<br />

suggests that they can serve only a small portion <strong>of</strong> the population in this particular drought-prone<br />

zone. To reach a broader segment, either more outlets have to be added, or alternative mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />

supply have to be encouraged (such as at open markets).<br />

Select monitoring and evaluation issues<br />

An Integrated Per<strong>for</strong>mance Monitoring and Evaluation (IPME ) framework has been built into project<br />

operations at varied levels—with the decentralized partners, the NARS, and overall with PABRA/<br />

CIAT. Routine data on seed produced, distributed, and sold is collected, along with insights on who<br />

is being reached and where. In addition, specialized M+E is being conducted on the costs <strong>of</strong> seed<br />

production, and on the quality <strong>of</strong> seed being produced by different organizations.<br />

Cost-benefit analysis <strong>of</strong> decentralized production models<br />

Seven models were costed and their advantages and disadvantages analyzed during <strong>Phase</strong> I. The<br />

focus has been on Kenya—and included one public sector organization, two private companies, and<br />

four decentralized means <strong>of</strong> production (facilitated by individuals, communities, and NGO and the<br />

government sector, respectively). Producing common bean seed proves pr<strong>of</strong>itable whether the product<br />

is certified or <strong>of</strong> ‘other quality’, but the magnitude <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it is highly linked to yield. Currently, all modes<br />

are vulnerable to the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> drought.<br />

Seed quality monitoring<br />

Seed quality assessment research was conducted in both countries comparing samples obtained from<br />

varied <strong>for</strong>mal and in<strong>for</strong>mal seed sector sources.<br />

In Kenya, seed was collected from trained seed bulking farmers, farmers who were secondary<br />

beneficiaries, and seed companies and parastatals involved with seed. The data from 91 farmer<br />

beneficiaries (74% women), randomly sampled across TL <strong>II</strong> sites, proved <strong>of</strong> particular interest. Data<br />

analysis showed that 81% <strong>of</strong> farmers’ sorted seeds were <strong>of</strong> good physical quality (according to ISTA<br />

standards), with a germination <strong>of</strong> 86.7%, and with very good vigor.<br />

In Ethiopia, 169 bean seed samples were collected from the Oromia and SNNPRS regions, including<br />

seed samples obtained from the <strong>for</strong>mal seed sector (seed companies, famers’ cooperatives unions and<br />

research centers) and local markets in the areas <strong>of</strong> project intervention. Physical purity proved relatively<br />

good across samples, ranging from 89.2% to 100 % with a mean <strong>of</strong> 97.5%. Germination percentage<br />

showed a greater range, between 68 and 97.3 with a mean <strong>of</strong> 78.9%. Seed health testing was also<br />

conducted <strong>for</strong> the two most important common bean bacterial pathogens; Xanthomonas campestris pv.<br />

phaseoli and Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. In terms <strong>of</strong> the in<strong>for</strong>mal sector, some common<br />

bean growers had produced seed <strong>of</strong> considerably better quality than others. There were cases where<br />

seeds obtained from the <strong>for</strong>mal sector fell below the minimum standards. Hence, the results showed<br />

that there was no evidence to assume that seeds from the decentralized seed system are inferior to that<br />

<strong>of</strong> the seed from the <strong>for</strong>mal sector.<br />

Progress <strong>of</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> 1<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!