Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 7-15: Training of local seed traders in proper seed handling from September 2007 onwards AP-Kurnool AP-Prakasham KA-Dharwad KA-Gulbarga Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women 2007-08 - - - - - - - - 2008-09 - - - - 15 - - - 2009-10 20 - 12 - 12 - 35 - 2010-11 22 - 14 - - - - - Total 42 0 26 0 27 0 35 0 Training of scientists and research technicians Two one-month training courses on “Chickpea Breeding and Seed Production” were organized at ICRISAT-Patancheru. The first course was organized during Jan-Feb 2008 and the second course during Jan-Feb 2009. Twelve researchers (9 men + 3 women) from the NARS of Ethiopia, Tanzania and Kenya participated (Table 16). The topics covered included conventional and biotechnological (genomic and transgenic) approaches of chickpea improvement and improved practices for chickpea cultivation and seed production. The participants also had opportunity to visit other organizations in Hyderabad working on seed-related research, seed production, and seed quality testing. Table 7-16: List of researchers provided one-month training on “Chickpea Breeding and Seed Production” at ICRISAT-Patancheru Name of trainee Gender Country Designation and affiliation Jan-Feb 2008 Mussa J. Hedo M Ethiopia Assistant Researcher (Breeding), DebreZeit Agricultural Research Center, DebreZeit Ketema D. Abdi M Ethiopia Assistant Researcher (Breeding), DebreZeit Agricultural Research Center, DebreZeit. Robert O. Kileo M Tanzania Principal Research Officer (Agriculture), Lake Zone Agricultural Research Institute, Ukiriguru, Mwanza Everina P. Lukonge F Tanzania Principal Agriculture Research Officer, Agricultural Research and training, Ukiriguru, Mwanza Paul K. Kimurto M Kenya Dept. of Crops and Soil Sciences, Egerton University, Nairobi Peter Kaloki M Kenya Technician, ICRISAT-Nairobi Jan-Feb 2009 Million EsheteWolde M Ethiopia Chickpea and Lentil Research project Coordinator, DebreZeit Agricultural Research Center, DebreZeit AbebeAtilawGizaw M Ethiopia Coordinator, Seed multiplication and Dissemination, DebreZeit Agricultural Research Center, DebreZeit Epifania Elias Temu F Tanzania Principal Agriculture Research Officer, Lake Zone Agricultural Research Institute, Ukiriguru, Mwanza Stella GamalielChirimi Bernard KibetTowett F Tanzania Principal Agricultural Field Officer, Lake Zone Agricultural Research Institute, Ukiriguru, Mwanza M Kenya Senior Technician, Dept. of Crops, Hort. and Soil Science, Egerton University, Nairobi. Wilson M Thagana M Kenya Senior Research Officer, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Nairobi 174 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | Tropical Legumes II Project
Development of infrastructure facilities The research stations have the responsibility of producing nucleus seed and breeder seed of the varieties developed by their institutes. Modest support was provided to strengthen infrastructure facilities for seed production, processing and storage at the participating research stations. The following facilities were developed: RARS-Nandyal: Renovation of existing seed storage structures, motorbike, electronic weighing Balance, digital seed counter, sump motor, and multi-crop thresher. ARS-Darsi: Seed processing plant (capacity: 2 MT/hr), seed storage stands for the seed store and motorbike. UAS-Dharwad: Mobile seed processing plant, seed storage bins, seed cabinets, and motorbike. ARS-Gulbarga: Sprayers, seed storage bins, motorbike, digital camera, and computer. Degree students Four students (3 men + 1 woman), one PhD student from India (Tosh Garg), two MSc studentsfrom Kenya (Peter Kaloki and Nancy WathimuNjogu) and one MSc student from Ethiopia (TadesseSafera), were accommodated for conducting their theses research on chickpea (Table 7-17). Except one student from Kenya (Peter Kaloki), all students completed all or part of their research work at ICRISAT-Patancheru. Thesis research of two of these students has some components of the application of molecular markers (linked to TL I). Two students (TadesseSefera and Peter Kaloki) have already been awarded degree, one student (Nancy WathimuNjogu) is writing thesis, and the remaining one student (Tosh Garg) is expected to submit his thesis during 2012. Table 7-17: Degree students conducting research on chickpea activities under TL-II project Student Gender Degree University Subject field Tadesse Sefera M MSc Haramaya University, Ethiopia Molecular characterization of Ethiopian chickpea varieties Peter Kaloki M MSc University of Nairobi, Kenya Genetic variability for high temperature tolerance in chickpea Nancy Wathimu Njogu F MSc Egerton University, Kenya Helicoverpa resistance in chickpea Tosh Garg M PhD Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab Molecular mapping of multiple disease resistance in chickpea Key lessons learned The key lessons learned are as follows: • Farmers’ awareness of the improved varieties and availability of the seed of improved varieties are the key factors in spread of improved chickpea varieties; • PVS trials are very effective in enhancing awareness of farmers to improved varieties and in spreading new varieties; • The farmers need some orientation and close follow ups for their active participation in PVS trials; • Farmers participation in varietal selection reduces the time required for varietal testing and possible high adoption of tested varieties before or after formal release; Progress of Phase 1 175
Page 1 and 2:
Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
Page 3:
TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
Page 6 and 7:
Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 8 and 9:
Seed production and delivery system
Page 10 and 11:
NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
Page 12 and 13:
TL II was implemented in 10 target
Page 14 and 15:
country governments in agricultural
Page 16 and 17:
Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
Page 18 and 19:
Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
Page 20 and 21:
As stated earlier in this chapter,
Page 22 and 23:
Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
Page 24 and 25:
Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
Page 26 and 27:
Project background Groundnut is one
Page 28 and 29:
Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
Page 30 and 31:
Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
Page 32 and 33:
Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
Page 34 and 35:
Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
Page 36 and 37:
Infrastructure facilities For effic
Page 38 and 39:
Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
Page 40 and 41:
In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
Page 42 and 43:
Training course A total of four tra
Page 44 and 45:
Background The yield of groundnut i
Page 46 and 47:
Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
Page 48 and 49:
In order of importance, the largest
Page 50 and 51:
Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
Page 52 and 53:
Finally, the variety choices are co
Page 54 and 55:
hybridization techniques, design of
Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
Page 58 and 59:
Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
Page 60 and 61:
Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
Page 62 and 63:
Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
Page 64 and 65:
54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
Page 66 and 67:
The European Union still remains th
Page 68 and 69:
Table 4-2: Proportion of households
Page 70 and 71:
Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
Page 72 and 73:
Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
Page 74 and 75:
The use of other inputs (credit, in
Page 76 and 77:
A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
Page 78 and 79:
Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
Page 80 and 81:
Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
Page 82 and 83:
99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
Page 84 and 85:
Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
Page 86 and 87:
A 10-day intensive training worksho
Page 88 and 89:
Seed production of all classes A to
Page 90 and 91:
Testing seed marketing strategies A
Page 92 and 93:
Area Global trends in area under co
Page 94 and 95:
Figure 5-3 shows that Nigeria made
Page 96 and 97:
much greater deficits. Under this s
Page 98 and 99:
and other inputs. • Popular varie
Page 100 and 101:
Mozambique Soybean seed multiplicat
Page 102 and 103:
dry savanna regions, where the bulk
Page 104 and 105:
Number of demonstration plots in ea
Page 106 and 107:
Mozambique Many farmers have shown
Page 108 and 109:
Table 5-7: Number of days to flower
Page 110 and 111:
most efficient and IT99K-7-21-2-2 w
Page 112 and 113:
Table 5-11: Ten SNPs converted and
Page 114 and 115:
Strengthening capacity of national
Page 116 and 117:
Infrastructure development at NARS
Page 118 and 119:
in Mali, 107.3 MT in Mozambique, an
Page 120 and 121:
produced over the first phase of th
Page 122 and 123:
Lessons learned TL II cowpea seed s
Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
Page 134 and 135: In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
Page 136 and 137: Summary, process gains and people r
Page 138 and 139: Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
Page 140 and 141: Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
Page 142 and 143: Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
Page 144 and 145: Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
Page 146 and 147: While the fast track entries were r
Page 148 and 149: Technology generation Mechanistic s
Page 150 and 151: 60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
Page 152 and 153: 16, and the advantage of some ALB l
Page 154 and 155: Number of degree training students
Page 156 and 157: Number of NARS technicians trained
Page 158 and 159: Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
Page 160 and 161: Impact assessment and enhancement P
Page 162 and 163: Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
Page 164 and 165: 154 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 166 and 167: farmers for enhancing their awarene
Page 168 and 169: • Designing, testing and implemen
Page 170 and 171: Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
Page 172 and 173: Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
Page 174 and 175: Constraints in adoption of chickpea
Page 176 and 177: Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
Page 178 and 179: Identification of farmer-and-market
Page 180 and 181: Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
Page 182 and 183: Capacity building Knowledge empower
Page 186 and 187: • In addition to yield, maturity
Page 188 and 189: Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
Page 190 and 191: Chickpea seed access The first majo
Page 192 and 193: Grades and standards About 75% of t
Page 194 and 195: Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
Page 196 and 197: private sector lacks the incentive
Page 198 and 199: • LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
Page 200 and 201: • Establishing functional legume
Page 202 and 203: Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
Page 204 and 205: Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
Page 206 and 207: Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
Page 208 and 209: TL II focuses on farmer-participato
Page 210 and 211: Production of Breeder, Foundation,
Page 212 and 213: Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
Page 214 and 215: (Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
Page 216 and 217: Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
Page 218 and 219: Available technologies Although imp
Page 220 and 221: and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
Page 222 and 223: Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
Page 224 and 225: Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
Page 226 and 227: Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
Page 228 and 229: Adoption studies Adoption studies f
Page 230 and 231: 3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
Page 232 and 233: Supply of important traits by the i
Page 234 and 235:
and marketing organization in Malaw
Page 236 and 237:
Table 11-3: Grain and fodder yields
Page 238 and 239:
Table 11-9: Communities and famers
Page 240 and 241:
Table 11-14 Average performance of
Page 242 and 243:
232 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 244 and 245:
Table 11-16: Soybean Breeder’s Se
Page 246 and 247:
Table 11-19: Grain yield (kg per ha
Page 248 and 249:
Table 11-23: F3 Segregating populat
Page 250 and 251:
At TSBF-CIAT in Kenya, a study was
Page 252 and 253:
Number of NARS scientists trained T
Page 254 and 255:
Improved access to markets Improved
Page 256 and 257:
Total 107.3 259.0 609.0 975.3 246 E
Page 258 and 259:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
Page 260 and 261:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
Page 262:
252 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
show all

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?