- Page 1 and 2: Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
- Page 3: TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
- Page 6 and 7: Seed Production and Delivery System
- Page 8 and 9: Seed production and delivery system
- Page 10 and 11: NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
- Page 12 and 13: TL II was implemented in 10 target
- Page 14 and 15: country governments in agricultural
- Page 16 and 17: Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
- Page 18 and 19: Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
- Page 20 and 21: As stated earlier in this chapter,
- Page 22 and 23: Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
- Page 24 and 25: Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
- Page 26 and 27: Project background Groundnut is one
- Page 28 and 29: Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
- Page 30 and 31: Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
- Page 34 and 35: Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
- Page 36 and 37: Infrastructure facilities For effic
- Page 38 and 39: Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
- Page 40 and 41: In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
- Page 42 and 43: Training course A total of four tra
- Page 44 and 45: Background The yield of groundnut i
- Page 46 and 47: Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
- Page 48 and 49: In order of importance, the largest
- Page 50 and 51: Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
- Page 52 and 53: Finally, the variety choices are co
- Page 54 and 55: hybridization techniques, design of
- Page 56 and 57: Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
- Page 58 and 59: Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
- Page 60 and 61: Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
- Page 62 and 63: Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
- Page 64 and 65: 54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
- Page 66 and 67: The European Union still remains th
- Page 68 and 69: Table 4-2: Proportion of households
- Page 70 and 71: Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
- Page 72 and 73: Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
- Page 74 and 75: The use of other inputs (credit, in
- Page 76 and 77: A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
- Page 78 and 79: Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
- Page 80 and 81: Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
- Page 82 and 83:
99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
- Page 84 and 85:
Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
- Page 86 and 87:
A 10-day intensive training worksho
- Page 88 and 89:
Seed production of all classes A to
- Page 90 and 91:
Testing seed marketing strategies A
- Page 92 and 93:
Area Global trends in area under co
- Page 94 and 95:
Figure 5-3 shows that Nigeria made
- Page 96 and 97:
much greater deficits. Under this s
- Page 98 and 99:
and other inputs. • Popular varie
- Page 100 and 101:
Mozambique Soybean seed multiplicat
- Page 102 and 103:
dry savanna regions, where the bulk
- Page 104 and 105:
Number of demonstration plots in ea
- Page 106 and 107:
Mozambique Many farmers have shown
- Page 108 and 109:
Table 5-7: Number of days to flower
- Page 110 and 111:
most efficient and IT99K-7-21-2-2 w
- Page 112 and 113:
Table 5-11: Ten SNPs converted and
- Page 114 and 115:
Strengthening capacity of national
- Page 116 and 117:
Infrastructure development at NARS
- Page 118 and 119:
in Mali, 107.3 MT in Mozambique, an
- Page 120 and 121:
produced over the first phase of th
- Page 122 and 123:
Lessons learned TL II cowpea seed s
- Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
- Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
- Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
- Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
- Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
- Page 134 and 135:
In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
- Page 136 and 137:
Summary, process gains and people r
- Page 138 and 139:
Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
- Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
- Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
- Page 144 and 145:
Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
- Page 146 and 147:
While the fast track entries were r
- Page 148 and 149:
Technology generation Mechanistic s
- Page 150 and 151:
60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
- Page 152 and 153:
16, and the advantage of some ALB l
- Page 154 and 155:
Number of degree training students
- Page 156 and 157:
Number of NARS technicians trained
- Page 158 and 159:
Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
- Page 160 and 161:
Impact assessment and enhancement P
- Page 162 and 163:
Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
- Page 164 and 165:
154 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
- Page 166 and 167:
farmers for enhancing their awarene
- Page 168 and 169:
• Designing, testing and implemen
- Page 170 and 171:
Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
- Page 172 and 173:
Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
- Page 174 and 175:
Constraints in adoption of chickpea
- Page 176 and 177:
Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
- Page 178 and 179:
Identification of farmer-and-market
- Page 180 and 181:
Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
- Page 182 and 183:
Capacity building Knowledge empower
- Page 184 and 185:
Table 7-15: Training of local seed
- Page 186 and 187:
• In addition to yield, maturity
- Page 188 and 189:
Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
- Page 190 and 191:
Chickpea seed access The first majo
- Page 192 and 193:
Grades and standards About 75% of t
- Page 194 and 195:
Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
- Page 196 and 197:
private sector lacks the incentive
- Page 198 and 199:
• LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
- Page 200 and 201:
• Establishing functional legume
- Page 202 and 203:
Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
- Page 204 and 205:
Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
- Page 206 and 207:
Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
- Page 208 and 209:
TL II focuses on farmer-participato
- Page 210 and 211:
Production of Breeder, Foundation,
- Page 212 and 213:
Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
- Page 214 and 215:
(Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
- Page 216 and 217:
Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
- Page 218 and 219:
Available technologies Although imp
- Page 220 and 221:
and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
- Page 222 and 223:
Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
- Page 224 and 225:
Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
- Page 226 and 227:
Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
- Page 228 and 229:
Adoption studies Adoption studies f
- Page 230 and 231:
3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
- Page 232 and 233:
Supply of important traits by the i
- Page 234 and 235:
and marketing organization in Malaw
- Page 236 and 237:
Table 11-3: Grain and fodder yields
- Page 238 and 239:
Table 11-9: Communities and famers
- Page 240 and 241:
Table 11-14 Average performance of
- Page 242 and 243:
232 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
- Page 244 and 245:
Table 11-16: Soybean Breeder’s Se
- Page 246 and 247:
Table 11-19: Grain yield (kg per ha
- Page 248 and 249:
Table 11-23: F3 Segregating populat
- Page 250 and 251:
At TSBF-CIAT in Kenya, a study was
- Page 252 and 253:
Number of NARS scientists trained T
- Page 254 and 255:
Improved access to markets Improved
- Page 256 and 257:
Total 107.3 259.0 609.0 975.3 246 E
- Page 258 and 259:
utilization and marketing. In Niger
- Page 260 and 261:
Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
- Page 262:
252 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |