20.01.2014 Views

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per household occupied by improved common bean varieties in four zones <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethiopia<br />

Kenya<br />

In Kenya, more than 60% <strong>of</strong> the farmers who planted any improved variety continued growing the<br />

variety after the first trial (Figure 6-4). Specifically, 74.5% continued growing KATB1, 66% <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />

continued growing KatB9, 77% <strong>of</strong> the farmers continued growing Katx56 and 88% p <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />

continued growing Katx69 (Figure 6-4). The expansion <strong>of</strong> the area under the improved varieties in<br />

Kenya seems to have been slower compared to Ethiopia, perhaps because <strong>of</strong> the severity <strong>of</strong> drought in<br />

Kenya, high diversity <strong>of</strong> varieties and subsistence nature <strong>of</strong> production that made some farmers eat all<br />

their harvest after first trial (Figure 6-4).<br />

Figure 6-4: Percentages <strong>of</strong> farmers in eastern Kenya who continued to grow the variety after first trial and those<br />

who expanded area under the variety after trial<br />

120<br />

Engaging Smallholder Farmers | <strong>Tropical</strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>II</strong> <strong>Project</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!