Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat
Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat
Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Phase</strong> I Social Sciences research in Objective 1 and Objective 8 focused on two countries: Kenya<br />
and Ethiopia. In Kenya, the project was spearheaded by the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute<br />
(KARI) and was implemented in the drought prone areas <strong>of</strong> Western Kenya along the Lake Basins<br />
(Nyanza and Western Provinces), Central and South Rift Valley (Rift Valley Province), dry land <strong>of</strong> Central<br />
Kenya (Central Kenya Province ) and Lower Eastern Province (dry land <strong>of</strong> Ukambani). In Ethiopia, the<br />
project was led by the Ethiopian Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research-Melkassa, allied with the Southern<br />
Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) and implemented in southern Ethiopia, the Central Rift Valley, and<br />
drylands <strong>of</strong> the eastern and north eastern parts <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
During the course <strong>of</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> I, these areas were characterized by a series <strong>of</strong> stresses. In Kenya, this<br />
included political unrest (at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the project) followed by continuous severe droughts<br />
every season. In Ethiopia, the drought was mainly been severe in 2009. Also, both countries routinely<br />
receive substantial amounts <strong>of</strong> food and seed aid.<br />
Socio-economic/Targeting<br />
In <strong>Phase</strong> 1, baseline studies were carried out to in<strong>for</strong>m the breeding and seed delivery components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project <strong>for</strong> better targeting <strong>of</strong> impact and efficient allocation <strong>of</strong> resources, as well as provide a<br />
baseline against which project impacts would be measured. The analysis focused on understanding the<br />
current situation <strong>of</strong> common bean production and productivity, the constraints that hinder increased<br />
productivity, and the socio-cultural and economic environments that facilitate or constrain adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
new technologies. Secondary time series data obtained from FAOSTAT and published reports were used<br />
to analyze the common bean production and yield trends in Eastern and Southern Africa. Primary data<br />
was gathered through a survey <strong>of</strong> randomly selected samples <strong>of</strong> farmers and traders along the value chains<br />
in two countries (Ethiopia and Kenya). The sampling frame was designed to support an impact evaluation<br />
that accounts <strong>for</strong> conditions “with” and “without” as well as “be<strong>for</strong>e” and “after” the project as part <strong>of</strong> an<br />
overall monitoring and evaluation framework. In each country, the population domain covers areas where<br />
common bean production is important but constrained by adverse climatic conditions, including domains<br />
that are purely commercial, semi-subsistence and largely subsistence. These three domains correspond<br />
to the Central Rift Valley <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia, the Southern Nations Nationality Peoples Regional State (SNNPR) <strong>of</strong><br />
Ethiopia and the semi arid Eastern province <strong>of</strong> Kenya, respectively. A multi-stage sampling procedure was<br />
used to select the actual villages and households included in the survey.<br />
Production and productivity trends<br />
Common bean production in eastern and southern Africa is mostly extensive rather than intensive. FAO<br />
data shows that area under the crop has grown by 20% in the last two decades while yield growth rates<br />
have been largely negative (FAO, 2008). It was largely declining in most <strong>of</strong> the top producing countries<br />
throughout 1990s. Although yield growth rate remained negative in many parts <strong>of</strong> ESA, it has also<br />
been recovering in the last decade (Figure 1). During the 2000s, the growth rate experienced recovery,<br />
reversing the negative trend to positive growth in Rwanda and Malawi, though it is still negative in<br />
Uganda, Kenya, Burundi, DRC and Tanzania (Figure 6-1). This recovery is partly a result <strong>of</strong> the ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />
<strong>of</strong> genetic improvement as well as innovations in the seed delivery and crop management systems to<br />
address the production constraints (especially declining soil fertility, drought, pests and diseases) by<br />
NARS and CIAT-PABRA research.<br />
Common bean production constraints<br />
Both secondary and primary data confirmed drought, pests and diseases, long standing soil fertility<br />
decline and seed accessibility problems as key constraints currently limiting common bean productivity<br />
growth.<br />
114<br />
Engaging Smallholder Farmers | <strong>Tropical</strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>II</strong> <strong>Project</strong>