20.01.2014 Views

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Phase</strong> I Social Sciences research in Objective 1 and Objective 8 focused on two countries: Kenya<br />

and Ethiopia. In Kenya, the project was spearheaded by the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute<br />

(KARI) and was implemented in the drought prone areas <strong>of</strong> Western Kenya along the Lake Basins<br />

(Nyanza and Western Provinces), Central and South Rift Valley (Rift Valley Province), dry land <strong>of</strong> Central<br />

Kenya (Central Kenya Province ) and Lower Eastern Province (dry land <strong>of</strong> Ukambani). In Ethiopia, the<br />

project was led by the Ethiopian Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research-Melkassa, allied with the Southern<br />

Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) and implemented in southern Ethiopia, the Central Rift Valley, and<br />

drylands <strong>of</strong> the eastern and north eastern parts <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

During the course <strong>of</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> I, these areas were characterized by a series <strong>of</strong> stresses. In Kenya, this<br />

included political unrest (at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the project) followed by continuous severe droughts<br />

every season. In Ethiopia, the drought was mainly been severe in 2009. Also, both countries routinely<br />

receive substantial amounts <strong>of</strong> food and seed aid.<br />

Socio-economic/Targeting<br />

In <strong>Phase</strong> 1, baseline studies were carried out to in<strong>for</strong>m the breeding and seed delivery components<br />

<strong>of</strong> the project <strong>for</strong> better targeting <strong>of</strong> impact and efficient allocation <strong>of</strong> resources, as well as provide a<br />

baseline against which project impacts would be measured. The analysis focused on understanding the<br />

current situation <strong>of</strong> common bean production and productivity, the constraints that hinder increased<br />

productivity, and the socio-cultural and economic environments that facilitate or constrain adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

new technologies. Secondary time series data obtained from FAOSTAT and published reports were used<br />

to analyze the common bean production and yield trends in Eastern and Southern Africa. Primary data<br />

was gathered through a survey <strong>of</strong> randomly selected samples <strong>of</strong> farmers and traders along the value chains<br />

in two countries (Ethiopia and Kenya). The sampling frame was designed to support an impact evaluation<br />

that accounts <strong>for</strong> conditions “with” and “without” as well as “be<strong>for</strong>e” and “after” the project as part <strong>of</strong> an<br />

overall monitoring and evaluation framework. In each country, the population domain covers areas where<br />

common bean production is important but constrained by adverse climatic conditions, including domains<br />

that are purely commercial, semi-subsistence and largely subsistence. These three domains correspond<br />

to the Central Rift Valley <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia, the Southern Nations Nationality Peoples Regional State (SNNPR) <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethiopia and the semi arid Eastern province <strong>of</strong> Kenya, respectively. A multi-stage sampling procedure was<br />

used to select the actual villages and households included in the survey.<br />

Production and productivity trends<br />

Common bean production in eastern and southern Africa is mostly extensive rather than intensive. FAO<br />

data shows that area under the crop has grown by 20% in the last two decades while yield growth rates<br />

have been largely negative (FAO, 2008). It was largely declining in most <strong>of</strong> the top producing countries<br />

throughout 1990s. Although yield growth rate remained negative in many parts <strong>of</strong> ESA, it has also<br />

been recovering in the last decade (Figure 1). During the 2000s, the growth rate experienced recovery,<br />

reversing the negative trend to positive growth in Rwanda and Malawi, though it is still negative in<br />

Uganda, Kenya, Burundi, DRC and Tanzania (Figure 6-1). This recovery is partly a result <strong>of</strong> the ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />

<strong>of</strong> genetic improvement as well as innovations in the seed delivery and crop management systems to<br />

address the production constraints (especially declining soil fertility, drought, pests and diseases) by<br />

NARS and CIAT-PABRA research.<br />

Common bean production constraints<br />

Both secondary and primary data confirmed drought, pests and diseases, long standing soil fertility<br />

decline and seed accessibility problems as key constraints currently limiting common bean productivity<br />

growth.<br />

114<br />

Engaging Smallholder Farmers | <strong>Tropical</strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>II</strong> <strong>Project</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!