Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 11-16: Soybean Breeder’s Seed produced (MT) from different varieties in the project countries, 2007/08 – 2009/10 Variety 2008 2009 2010 Total Malawi Nasoko 0.300 3.980 5.181 9.461 Ocepara-4 0.500 1.250 0.852 2.602 Magoye 0.100 0.510 0.128 0.738 Makwacha 4.110 4.131 8.241 TGx 1740-2F 0.060 0.060 Breeding lines 1.411 1.411 Malawi total 0.900 9.850 11.763 22.513 Mozambique TGx 1908-8F 2.991 3.400 6.391 TGx 1937-1F 2.145 2.300 4.445 TGx 1904-6F 1.644 2.875 4.519 TGx 1740-2F 2.158 3.450 5.608 TGx 1485-1D 1.381 0.850 2.231 TGx 1835-10E 0.157 1.200 1.357 TGx 1910-14F 0.911 0.911 TGx 1951-3F 0.056 0.850 0.906 TGx 1972-1F 0.950 0.950 TGx 1963-3F 0.900 0.900 Breeding lines 0.600 0.900 1.500 Mozambique total 0.600 12.343 16.775 29.718 Nigeria TGx 1440-1E 0.100 0.003 0.103 TGx 1448-2E 0.111 0.012 0.123 TGx 1019-2EB 0.005 0.015 0.020 TGx 1835-10E 0.159 0.040 0.199 TGx 1485-1D 0.006 0.006 TGx 1904-6F 0.004 0.100 0.104 TGx 1019-2EN 0.002 0.002 TGx 1987-10F 0.334 0.050 0.384 TGx 1987-62F 0.112 0.050 0.162 Breeding lines 0.502 0.693 0.888 2.083 Nigeria total 0.718 1.34 1.128 3.186 Kenya Namsoy 4m 0.300 0.906 1.206 TGx 1835-10E 0.300 1.714 2.014 TGx 1740-2F 0.310 2.116 2.426 TGx 1895-33F 0.063 0.063 Maksoy-1a 0.311 0.311 Nyala 0.182 0.182 Gazelle 0.264 0.264 Breeding lines 2.035 2.035 Kenya total 0.000 0.910 7.591 8.501 Overall total 2.218 24.443 37.257 63.918 234 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | Tropical Legumes II Project
In Nigeria, across locations mean performance data for grain yield of rust resistant lines is presented in Table 11-21. TGx 1987-62F and TGx 1987-10F gave an average grain yield of 1841 and 1719 kg per ha, respectively, in three-year multi-location on-station trials. TGx 1987-62F and TGx 1987-10F gave a respective 50% and 40% more grain yield as compared to an early maturing variety TGx 1485-1D in a three-year average performance. They also surpassed the recently released variety TGx 1835-10E by 33% to 41% in grain yield in the 2009 and 2010 on-station trials. These varieties mature in 96-97 days on average and are capable of producing 2.6 MT per ha fodder under on-station trials condition. Besides giving high grain yields, these varieties were found to be resistant to soybean rust and other foliar diseases. In the 2009 and 2010 trials, rust incidence in these varieties was only 0.2-0.5%, as compared to the susceptible variety TGx 1485-1D that showed a 61% incidence in the same trial (Table 11-22). Table 11.17: Number of soybean varieties and elite lines distributed to NARS Country Institute 2007 2008 2009 Total Malawi DARS 60 60 Mozambique IITA-Mozambique 20 58 60 138 Nigeria NCRI 20 6 20 46 Kenya TSBF-CIAT 21 19 40 Kenya KARI 19 19 Kenya Leldet 9 9 Tanzania ARI-Ilonga 25 25 Ethiopia EIAR 20 20 Total 155 84 118 357 Table 11-18: Mean grain yield (kg per ha) of soybean genotypes in advanced variety trial early set at four locations in Malawi - 2009/10 growing season Genotype Chitedze Chitala Makoka Mbawa Mean TGx 1987-62F 2919 1906 1389 2361 2144 TGx 1805-31F 2724 1878 532 3264 2099 TGx 1987-64F 2467 2189 1408 1500 1891 TGx 1485-1D 2077 2228 726 2458 1872 Magoye 2190 2194 928 1694 1752 TGx 1987-11F 2571 1517 858 2014 1740 TGx 1987-10F 3274 1600 847 972 1673 TGx 1987-18F 2204 2212 818 1251 1621 TGx 1987-65F 2228 1794 1096 1208 1582 TGx 1987-23F 2028 1733 541 1806 1527 TGx 1987-6F 2605 1211 1056 1069 1485 TGx 1987-34F 1891 1522 669 1736 1455 TGx 1987-31F 2338 1467 874 1125 1451 TGx 1987-9F 1691 1994 824 1264 1443 TGx 1987-17F 2210 1239 866 1361 1419 TGx 1987-25F 2220 1511 706 1236 1418 TGx 1987-8F 2086 1794 897 862 1410 TGx 1987-20F 2142 1217 573 1611 1386 Nasoko 2274 950 912 1333 1367 UG 5 1833 1167 1161 1264 1356 TGx 1987-32F 2076 1544 602 1111 1333 TGx 1987-28F 1454 1567 647 1333 1250 Mean (22 lines) 2250 1656 860 1538 1576 SE 346 229 179 458 161 LSD (0.05) NS 654 511 NS 449 Progress of Phase 1 235
Page 1 and 2:
Tropical Legumes II Project TROPICA
Page 3:
TROPICAL LEGUMES II Tropical Legume
Page 6 and 7:
Seed Production and Delivery System
Page 8 and 9:
Seed production and delivery system
Page 10 and 11:
NARES NASFAM NASSPA NPT NSC NSO NSS
Page 12 and 13:
TL II was implemented in 10 target
Page 14 and 15:
country governments in agricultural
Page 16 and 17:
Table 1-2: continued Variety code (
Page 18 and 19:
Table 1-3: Seed production and deli
Page 20 and 21:
As stated earlier in this chapter,
Page 22 and 23:
Table 1-5: Graduate degree students
Page 24 and 25:
Ndjeunga J, Ibro A, Cisse Y, Ben Ah
Page 26 and 27:
Project background Groundnut is one
Page 28 and 29:
Table 2-2: Performance of ICGV 0035
Page 30 and 31:
Table 2-6: Performance of ICGV 9111
Page 32 and 33:
Table 2-11: Results of 255 paired c
Page 34 and 35:
Table 2-16: Groundnut seed of vario
Page 36 and 37:
Infrastructure facilities For effic
Page 38 and 39:
Project sites Tamil Nadu The presen
Page 40 and 41:
In Karnataka, the PDKV model was pr
Page 42 and 43:
Training course A total of four tra
Page 44 and 45:
Background The yield of groundnut i
Page 46 and 47:
Table 3-2: Groundnut production tre
Page 48 and 49:
In order of importance, the largest
Page 50 and 51:
Table 3-5: Results of pair-wise com
Page 52 and 53:
Finally, the variety choices are co
Page 54 and 55:
hybridization techniques, design of
Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3-2: The Malawi model of the
Page 58 and 59:
Tanzania TL II has contributed to t
Page 60 and 61:
Annex 3-2: Performance of Virginia
Page 62 and 63:
Annex 3-4: Regional elite groundnut
Page 64 and 65:
54 Engaging Smallholder Farmers | T
Page 66 and 67:
The European Union still remains th
Page 68 and 69:
Table 4-2: Proportion of households
Page 70 and 71:
Table 4-4: Amount requested, amount
Page 72 and 73:
Table 4-6. Comparison of groundnut
Page 74 and 75:
The use of other inputs (credit, in
Page 76 and 77:
A PVS evaluation was launched in pi
Page 78 and 79:
Table 4-10: Locations and contact f
Page 80 and 81:
Table 4-11: Mean pod yield (kg per
Page 82 and 83:
99511 (Table 4-12). Most important
Page 84 and 85:
Table 4-15: Evaluation of groundnut
Page 86 and 87:
A 10-day intensive training worksho
Page 88 and 89:
Seed production of all classes A to
Page 90 and 91:
Testing seed marketing strategies A
Page 92 and 93:
Area Global trends in area under co
Page 94 and 95:
Figure 5-3 shows that Nigeria made
Page 96 and 97:
much greater deficits. Under this s
Page 98 and 99:
and other inputs. • Popular varie
Page 100 and 101:
Mozambique Soybean seed multiplicat
Page 102 and 103:
dry savanna regions, where the bulk
Page 104 and 105:
Number of demonstration plots in ea
Page 106 and 107:
Mozambique Many farmers have shown
Page 108 and 109:
Table 5-7: Number of days to flower
Page 110 and 111:
most efficient and IT99K-7-21-2-2 w
Page 112 and 113:
Table 5-11: Ten SNPs converted and
Page 114 and 115:
Strengthening capacity of national
Page 116 and 117:
Infrastructure development at NARS
Page 118 and 119:
in Mali, 107.3 MT in Mozambique, an
Page 120 and 121:
produced over the first phase of th
Page 122 and 123:
Lessons learned TL II cowpea seed s
Page 124 and 125:
Phase I Social Sciences research in
Page 126 and 127:
The consequences are that the impro
Page 128 and 129:
about half of area share of land al
Page 130 and 131:
Figure 6-3: Average area (ha) per h
Page 132 and 133:
single lingering bottleneck on whic
Page 134 and 135:
In Kenya, the small seed pack appro
Page 136 and 137:
Summary, process gains and people r
Page 138 and 139:
Fast-Tracking and Technology Genera
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6-6: Distribution of PVS sit
Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-12: Yields of fast track bu
Page 144 and 145:
Table 6-15: Farmer evaluation of in
Page 146 and 147:
While the fast track entries were r
Page 148 and 149:
Technology generation Mechanistic s
Page 150 and 151:
60 50 Rainfall Pan evaporation Maxi
Page 152 and 153:
16, and the advantage of some ALB l
Page 154 and 155:
Number of degree training students
Page 156 and 157:
Number of NARS technicians trained
Page 158 and 159:
Rain-out shelter in CIAT-Colombia T
Page 160 and 161:
Impact assessment and enhancement P
Page 162 and 163:
Annex 6-2: TL IIEthiopia: decentral
Page 164 and 165:
154 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 166 and 167:
farmers for enhancing their awarene
Page 168 and 169:
• Designing, testing and implemen
Page 170 and 171:
Andhra Pradesh The overall sample s
Page 172 and 173:
Prakasam district: Crops grown in P
Page 174 and 175:
Constraints in adoption of chickpea
Page 176 and 177:
Cost-benefit analysis for chickpea
Page 178 and 179:
Identification of farmer-and-market
Page 180 and 181:
Table 7-6: Breeder Seed of differen
Page 182 and 183:
Capacity building Knowledge empower
Page 184 and 185:
Table 7-15: Training of local seed
Page 186 and 187:
• In addition to yield, maturity
Page 188 and 189:
Introduction Chickpea is grown in E
Page 190 and 191:
Chickpea seed access The first majo
Page 192 and 193:
Grades and standards About 75% of t
Page 194 and 195: Table 8-6: Varieties used in PVS tr
Page 196 and 197: private sector lacks the incentive
Page 198 and 199: • LZARDI-Ukiriguru: Land along wi
Page 200 and 201: • Establishing functional legume
Page 202 and 203: Table 9-1: Farmers’ preferred var
Page 204 and 205: Table 9-3: Baby trials conducted in
Page 206 and 207: Table 9-5: Reaction of pigeonpea li
Page 208 and 209: TL II focuses on farmer-participato
Page 210 and 211: Production of Breeder, Foundation,
Page 212 and 213: Mahaboobnagar and Ranga Reddy distr
Page 214 and 215: (Table 9-9 Continued) Particular To
Page 216 and 217: Chichewa) and Tanzania (Swahili). O
Page 218 and 219: Available technologies Although imp
Page 220 and 221: and Chitedze in Malawi showed that
Page 222 and 223: Table 10-6: Various classes of qual
Page 224 and 225: Awareness activities Farmers’ fie
Page 226 and 227: Annex 10-1: Target locations for pi
Page 228 and 229: Adoption studies Adoption studies f
Page 230 and 231: 3.5 Yields (Tonnes/hectare) 3.0 2.5
Page 232 and 233: Supply of important traits by the i
Page 234 and 235: and marketing organization in Malaw
Page 236 and 237: Table 11-3: Grain and fodder yields
Page 238 and 239: Table 11-9: Communities and famers
Page 240 and 241: Table 11-14 Average performance of
Page 242 and 243: 232 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
Page 246 and 247: Table 11-19: Grain yield (kg per ha
Page 248 and 249: Table 11-23: F3 Segregating populat
Page 250 and 251: At TSBF-CIAT in Kenya, a study was
Page 252 and 253: Number of NARS scientists trained T
Page 254 and 255: Improved access to markets Improved
Page 256 and 257: Total 107.3 259.0 609.0 975.3 246 E
Page 258 and 259: utilization and marketing. In Niger
Page 260 and 261: Annex 11-2: Tobit Model estimate of
Page 262: 252 Engaging Smallholder Farmers |
show all

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?