20.01.2014 Views

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

Final version of Tropical Legumes II Project Report for Phase 1 - icrisat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

about half <strong>of</strong> area share <strong>of</strong> land allocated to common bean per farm was occupied by Mexican 142,<br />

released in 1972, grown by 64% <strong>of</strong> the households. Similarly, Red Wolaita, a cooking type released<br />

in 1974, occupied about 70% <strong>of</strong> the area under beans in SNNPR (Annex 6-1). The few dominating<br />

varieties were also the longest grown in the communities. The average number <strong>of</strong> years a variety was<br />

grown on a farm in Eastern Kenya ranged from 4 to 17 years, with few farmers maintaining the same<br />

variety longer than 30 years. In Ethiopia, the average number <strong>of</strong> years a bean variety had been grown<br />

ranged from 2 years to 12 years.<br />

The adoption <strong>of</strong> the varieties released in early 1990s and 2000s in 2008 was still low, grown by 37.4%<br />

in Eastern Kenya, 42.6% in the central rift valley and only 7.6% in SNNPR (Table 6-3). In terms <strong>of</strong> area<br />

share, it was estimated at 11% in eastern Kenya, 44% in the central rift valley and about 12% in SNNPR<br />

(Table 6-3). Impediments to adoption <strong>of</strong> the improved varieties were cited as lack <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation about<br />

the varieties and seed related problems already discussed in the previous sections.<br />

Table 6-3: Use rates and area share <strong>of</strong> improved common bean varieties in the study area <strong>of</strong> Eastern<br />

Kenya and Ethiopia, 2008<br />

Description<br />

Eastern Kenya<br />

(N=123)<br />

Central Rift Valley<br />

(N=115)<br />

SNNPR (N=105)<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> farmers<br />

Improved varieties released 1990s-2000s 37.4 42.6 7.6<br />

All Improved varieties 82.1 92.2 83.8<br />

Landraces 88.6 1.7 12.4<br />

Percentage area share<br />

Improved varieties released 1990s-2000s 10.7 43. 9 12.5<br />

All improved varieties 39.3 96.2 94.0<br />

Land races 60.8 3.8 6.1<br />

Variety adoption during phase 1 (2007-2011)<br />

Following interventions to improve seed accessibility through scaling up/out <strong>of</strong> the seed multiplication<br />

and distribution activities under TL <strong>II</strong> (together with PABRA in 2007-2010 2 ), positive changes were<br />

expected in terms <strong>of</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation and variety uptake in both countries. In 2010, a structured<br />

monitoring and evaluation activity was implemented to assess early adoption so as to provide a feedback<br />

to researchers and policy makers. A total <strong>of</strong> 211 farmers randomly selected from the four production<br />

zones (East Shewa, West Arsi, Sidama and Western Haraghe) <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia were surveyed. In Kenya, the<br />

early adoption surveys were also conducted in five production regions (Nyanza, Western, and Lower<br />

Rift Valley, Central and Eastern Provinces <strong>of</strong> Kenya), involving 266 randomly selected households.<br />

In each country, villages in each district were selected with the help <strong>of</strong> the contact secondary partner<br />

in the area to represent locations that were exposed to the project and those that had not been directly<br />

exposed to the improved varieties by the project. To enable assessment <strong>of</strong> any changes in adoption <strong>of</strong> the<br />

improved varieties, a randomly selected sub-sample <strong>of</strong> the baseline sample was re-interviewed. A brief<br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> the key findings is presented in the next sections.<br />

Ethiopia<br />

Research findings revealed significant increases in in<strong>for</strong>mation and seed diffusion among potential<br />

adopters. Over 60% <strong>of</strong> farmers were aware <strong>of</strong> the existence and superiority <strong>of</strong> the varieties by 2010. The<br />

overall analysis <strong>of</strong> the variety use across the whole sample in Ethiopia showed that four varieties (Awash<br />

2 Note that, in both countries some <strong>of</strong> the varieties being promoted under TL <strong>II</strong> have been released <strong>for</strong> many years—but farmers just did<br />

not know them. In Kenya, the early-maturing, marketable Katumani varieties were released by KARI in the mid-1990s but, until 2008,<br />

were little known by farmers, except around the Katumani Research Center. In Ethiopia, some <strong>of</strong> the varieties which moved quickly<br />

under TL <strong>II</strong>, Awash 1, Awash-Melka and Nasir, were released in the early to late 1990s.<br />

118<br />

Engaging Smallholder Farmers | <strong>Tropical</strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>II</strong> <strong>Project</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!