28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

91<br />

The NOAEL was 25 ppm, equal to 1.8 mg/kg bw per day, on the basis of estrous cycle alterations<br />

and attenuation of the LH surge at 50 ppm (Morseth, 1996c).<br />

In a study on the effects of atraz<strong>in</strong>e on the hypothalamic control of pituitary-ovarian function <strong>in</strong><br />

the rat, the estrogen-<strong>in</strong>duced surges of LH and prolact<strong>in</strong> were exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> ovariectomized Sprague-<br />

Dawley and LE rats treated with atraz<strong>in</strong>e (purity, 97.1%) by gavage for 1, 3 or 21 days. Rats treated<br />

for 1 day were ovariectomized and received a subcutaneous estrogen implant on day 0, and then<br />

atraz<strong>in</strong>e at a dose of 0, 50, 100, 200 or 300 mg/kg bw on day 3, and were killed at 0, 1, 3 or 6 h after<br />

treatment. Rats treated for 3 days were ovariectomized and received a subcutaneous estrogen implant<br />

on day 0, and then atraz<strong>in</strong>e at a dose of 0, 50, 100, 200 or 300 mg/kg bw per day on days 1–3, and<br />

were killed at 0, 1, 3 or 6 h after treatment on day 3. Rats treated for 21 days were ovariectomized on<br />

day 0, and then received atraz<strong>in</strong>e at a dose of 0, 75, 150 or 300 mg/kg bw per day on days 1–21, followed<br />

by a subcutaneous estrogen implant on day 21 and were killed on day 24 at the time of expected<br />

peak LH concentration.<br />

Atraz<strong>in</strong>e at the highest s<strong>in</strong>gle dose (300 mg/kg bw) significantly suppressed the LH and prolact<strong>in</strong><br />

surge <strong>in</strong> ovariectomized LE rats, but not <strong>in</strong> Sprague-Dawley rats. Treatment with atraz<strong>in</strong>e on three<br />

consecutive days suppressed the estrogen-<strong>in</strong>duced LH and prolact<strong>in</strong> surges <strong>in</strong> ovariectomized LE<br />

females <strong>in</strong> a dose-dependent manner at 50 mg/kg bw and greater, but this same treatment was without<br />

effect on serum LH and prolact<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Sprague-Dawley females. Also <strong>in</strong> LE females, exposure to atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

at a dose of 50 mg/kg bw and greater <strong>in</strong>hibited the decrease <strong>in</strong> pituitary prolact<strong>in</strong> concentration<br />

that was observed <strong>in</strong> rats <strong>in</strong> the control group. After 21 days of treatment with atraz<strong>in</strong>e, there was a<br />

significant dose-dependent suppression of serum LH and prolact<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> both stra<strong>in</strong>s at all doses, while<br />

the concentration of prolact<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the pituitary was significantly <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> both stra<strong>in</strong>s at all doses.<br />

In a further experiment conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effect of a s<strong>in</strong>gle dose of atraz<strong>in</strong>e on ovulation<br />

and ovarian cycl<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>tact female LE rats display<strong>in</strong>g regular 4-day estrous cycles received<br />

atraz<strong>in</strong>e at a dose of 0, 75, 150 or 300 mg/kg bw on the day of vag<strong>in</strong>al proestrus, and vag<strong>in</strong>al smears<br />

were exam<strong>in</strong>ed for 3 weeks <strong>in</strong> half of the rats <strong>in</strong> each group, while <strong>in</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rats, oocytes<br />

were collected and quantified on the day of vag<strong>in</strong>al estrus. Atraz<strong>in</strong>e adm<strong>in</strong>istered at the highest dose<br />

of 300 mg/kg bw <strong>in</strong>duced a pseudopregnancy <strong>in</strong> seven of n<strong>in</strong>e females, but was without effect on<br />

ovulation.<br />

Three further experiments were performed to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the bra<strong>in</strong>, pituitary or both<br />

organs were target sites for atraz<strong>in</strong>e. These <strong>in</strong>cluded exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the ability of: (a) the pituitary<br />

lactotrophs to secrete prolact<strong>in</strong>, us<strong>in</strong>g hypophysectomized females bear<strong>in</strong>g pituitary autotransplants<br />

(ectopic pituitaries) <strong>in</strong> female LE rats receiv<strong>in</strong>g atraz<strong>in</strong>e as a s<strong>in</strong>gle dose at 300 mg/kg bw; (b) the<br />

synthetic GnRH to <strong>in</strong>duce LH secretion <strong>in</strong> ovariectomized LE rats treated with atraz<strong>in</strong>e at a dose of<br />

300 mg/kg bw for 3 days; and (c) atraz<strong>in</strong>e (adm<strong>in</strong>istered <strong>in</strong> vivo or <strong>in</strong> vitro) to suppress LH and prolact<strong>in</strong><br />

secretion from pituitaries, us<strong>in</strong>g a flow-through perfusion procedure. The results <strong>in</strong>dicated that:<br />

(a) the secretion of prolact<strong>in</strong> by the pituitary was not altered by atraz<strong>in</strong>e if the gland was removed<br />

from the <strong>in</strong>fluence of central nervous sytem factors; (b) the effect of atraz<strong>in</strong>e on LH secretion was<br />

not a result of a direct impairment of LH release from the pituitary; and (c) direct exposure of the<br />

pituitary had no effect on the release of LH and prolact<strong>in</strong>.<br />

In summary, the experiments demonstrated a clear effect of atraz<strong>in</strong>e on the estrogen-<strong>in</strong>duced<br />

LH and prolact<strong>in</strong> surge <strong>in</strong> female LE and Sprague-Dawley rats. LE rats appeared to be more sensitive<br />

to the hormone-suppressive effects of atraz<strong>in</strong>e than Sprague-Dawley rats. The results support the<br />

hypothesis that the effects of atraz<strong>in</strong>e on LH and prolact<strong>in</strong> secretion are mediated via a hypothalamic<br />

site of action (Cooper et al., 2000).<br />

In a study designed to compare the effects of atraz<strong>in</strong>e and its metabolite DACT on the the<br />

pre-ovulatory LH surge, groups of 20 female Sprague-Dawley [Crl:CD BR] rats were given atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

(purity, 97.1%) or DACT (purity, 96.8%) at a dose of 2,5, 5, 40 or 200 mg/kg bw per day by oral<br />

ATRAZINE 37–138 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!