28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent reviews (Neuberger, 1996; Sathiakumar & Delzell, 1997; IARC, 1999) have identified<br />

ten case–control studies and two published cohort studies of workers exposed to triaz<strong>in</strong>es at<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plants.<br />

Neuberger (1996) reported that of the ten case–control studies published, six of which considered<br />

atraz<strong>in</strong>e, none <strong>in</strong>dicated any statistically significant association between atraz<strong>in</strong>e and cancer. Two<br />

studies <strong>in</strong>dicated marg<strong>in</strong>ally significant associations between triaz<strong>in</strong>es and cancer (odds ratio, OR,<br />

1.6; 95% confidence <strong>in</strong>terval, CI, 1.0–2.6; and OR, 2.7; 90% CI, 1.0–6.9). The author concluded:<br />

…on the basis of the data to date… there is no conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g evidence of a causal association between<br />

atraz<strong>in</strong>e and/or triaz<strong>in</strong>e(s) and colon cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, Hodgk<strong>in</strong>’s disease, multiple myeloma,<br />

or leukaemia… There is a suggestion of a possible association between atraz<strong>in</strong>e and/or triaz<strong>in</strong>e(s)<br />

with ovarian cancer and non-Hodgk<strong>in</strong>’s lymphoma. However, the ovarian cancer study needs to be<br />

replicated and the NHL studies fall short of provid<strong>in</strong>g conclusive evidence of risk because the results<br />

could be due to chance, bias, or confound<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Sathiakumar & Delzell (1997) assessed the relation between triaz<strong>in</strong>es and non-Hodgk<strong>in</strong> lymphoma<br />

<strong>in</strong> four <strong>in</strong>dependent population-based case–control studies, report<strong>in</strong>g OR of between 1.2 and<br />

2.5, and concluded that these weak statistical associations may have been produced by chance and/<br />

or confound<strong>in</strong>g by other agricultural exposures. Furthermore, a pooled analysis of three case–control<br />

studies and the comb<strong>in</strong>ed analysis of two retrospective follow-up studies did not demonstrate the<br />

types of dose–response relationship or <strong>in</strong>duction-time patterns that would be expected if triaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

were causal factors. The authors concluded that the available epidemiological studies, s<strong>in</strong>gly and<br />

collectively, did not provide any consistent, conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g evidence of a causal relationship between<br />

exposure to triaz<strong>in</strong>e herbicides and cancer <strong>in</strong> humans.<br />

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 1999) summarized their evaluation<br />

of data on human carc<strong>in</strong>ogenicity as follows:<br />

A comb<strong>in</strong>ed analysis of results of two cohort studies of agricultural chemical production workers <strong>in</strong><br />

the United States showed decreased mortality from cancers at all sites comb<strong>in</strong>ed among the subset of<br />

workers who had had def<strong>in</strong>ite or probable exposures to triaz<strong>in</strong>e. Site-specific analyses <strong>in</strong> this subset<br />

of workers yielded no significant f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs; a non-significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of deaths from<br />

non-Hodgk<strong>in</strong>’s lymphoma was seen, but was on the basis of very few observed cases.<br />

A pooled analysis of the results of three population-based case–control studies of men <strong>in</strong> Kansas,<br />

eastern Nebraska and Iowa-M<strong>in</strong>nesota, United States, <strong>in</strong> which the risk for non-Hodgk<strong>in</strong>’s lymphoma<br />

<strong>in</strong> relation to exposure to atraz<strong>in</strong>e and other herbicides on farms was evaluated, showed a significant<br />

association; however, the association was weaker when adjustment was made for reported use of<br />

phenoxyacetic acid herbicides or organophosphate <strong>in</strong>secticides. In all these studies, the farmers<br />

tended to have an <strong>in</strong>creased risk for non-Hodgk<strong>in</strong>’s lymphoma, but the excess could not be attributed<br />

to atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Less <strong>in</strong>formation was available to evaluate the association between exposure to atraz<strong>in</strong>e and other<br />

cancers of the lymphatic and haematopoietic tissues. One study of Hodgk<strong>in</strong>’s disease <strong>in</strong> Kansas,<br />

one study of leukaemia <strong>in</strong> Iowa-M<strong>in</strong>nesota and one study of multiple myeloma from Iowa gave no<br />

<strong>in</strong>dication of excess risk among persons handl<strong>in</strong>g triaz<strong>in</strong>e herbicides.<br />

In a population-based study <strong>in</strong> Italy, def<strong>in</strong>ite exposure to triaz<strong>in</strong>es was associated with a two to<br />

threefold <strong>in</strong>crease of borderl<strong>in</strong>e significance <strong>in</strong> the risk for ovarian cancer. The study was small (65<br />

cases, 126 controls), and potential confound<strong>in</strong>g by exposure to other herbicides was not controlled<br />

<strong>in</strong> the analysis.<br />

Therefore, on the basis of the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs described above the IARC (1999) concluded: “There is<br />

<strong>in</strong>adequate evidence <strong>in</strong> humans for the carc<strong>in</strong>ogenicity of atraz<strong>in</strong>e.”<br />

ATRAZINE 37–138 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!