28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

258<br />

Microscopic exam<strong>in</strong>ations revealed <strong>in</strong>itial changes <strong>in</strong> the lens, <strong>in</strong>dicative of cataract, <strong>in</strong> three<br />

out of five males and one out of five females treated with difenoconazole. The lesions comprised<br />

slight swell<strong>in</strong>g of the epithelial cells either at the equator or anteriorly, and/or necrosis of the lens<br />

fibres posteriorly, under the capsule or <strong>in</strong> the outer cortex. Among the chickens <strong>in</strong> the positive-control<br />

group, two out of three males developed changes <strong>in</strong>dicative of cataract (necrosis of the lens fibres,<br />

posterior under the capsule); one female <strong>in</strong> the positive-control group showed a slight swell<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

lens epithelium at the equator. No changes were seen <strong>in</strong> the lenses of the chickens <strong>in</strong> the negativecontrol<br />

group (Schoch & Schneider, 1989). The sponsor considered that, <strong>in</strong> the absence of dose–<br />

response <strong>in</strong>formation, this high-dose phenomenon should be considered of no human relevance;<br />

however, the experimental design was such that a dose–response relationship could never have been<br />

observed.<br />

Dogs<br />

In a study of cataract <strong>in</strong>duction, groups of three male and three female pure-bred beagle dogs<br />

(KFM Kle<strong>in</strong>tierfarm Madoer<strong>in</strong>, Füll<strong>in</strong>sdorf, Switzerland) were given diets conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g difenoconazole<br />

technical (purity 95%) at a concentration of of 0, 3000, 4000 or 6000 ppm for up to 18 weeks<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to a complex dos<strong>in</strong>g schedule (Table 22).<br />

Mortality was checked and cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs were recorded daily. Individual body weights were<br />

recorded weekly and <strong>food</strong> consumption was recorded daily. Eye exam<strong>in</strong>ations were conducted on all<br />

dogs before exposure and every 2 weeks thereafter. Haematology and blood chemistry <strong>in</strong>vestigations<br />

were carried out on all dogs before the exposure period and dur<strong>in</strong>g weeks 3, 13 and 19. Surviv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dogs were killed <strong>in</strong> week 19. All dogs were subjected to a detailed autopsy. Specified organs were<br />

weighed. Eyes and tissues with macroscopic f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were exam<strong>in</strong>ed microscopically.<br />

There were no deaths <strong>in</strong> the test. The only cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs noted were vomit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the male <strong>in</strong> the<br />

reference group and a female <strong>in</strong> the recovery group dur<strong>in</strong>g the first study week and faecal changes <strong>in</strong><br />

the female <strong>in</strong> the reference group dur<strong>in</strong>g weeks 6 and 9, a male <strong>in</strong> the recovery group dur<strong>in</strong>g week 10<br />

and a female <strong>in</strong> the recovery group dur<strong>in</strong>g week 14.<br />

All dogs lost body weight dur<strong>in</strong>g the first study week, 13–14% from <strong>in</strong>itial values <strong>in</strong> the males<br />

and 11–15% <strong>in</strong> the females. After the dietary concentration was reduced to 3000 ppm, all dogs began<br />

to ga<strong>in</strong> weight. The males <strong>in</strong> the reference and recovery groups ga<strong>in</strong>ed weight at approximately<br />

the same rate, but the female <strong>in</strong> the reference group ga<strong>in</strong>ed weight at a slower rate than those <strong>in</strong> the<br />

r ecovery group and lost weight aga<strong>in</strong> when the dietary concentration was <strong>in</strong>creased to 4000 ppm.<br />

Food consumption was markedly depressed <strong>in</strong> all dogs dur<strong>in</strong>g the first study week, be<strong>in</strong>g between<br />

72 and 85% lower than the last value recorded before dos<strong>in</strong>g for males and 81–88% lower for<br />

the females. Food consumption <strong>in</strong>creased for all dogs when the concentration was lowered to 3000<br />

ppm. By week 3, all males and the females <strong>in</strong> the recovery group were consum<strong>in</strong>g all of the diet<br />

o ffered. The female <strong>in</strong> the reference group consistently consumed less than the other dogs.<br />

Table 22. Dos<strong>in</strong>g schedule used <strong>in</strong> a special study of cataract <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>in</strong> dogs fed diets<br />

c onta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g difenoconazole<br />

Time-po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Dietary concentration (ppm)<br />

Group 1 (reference)<br />

Group 2 (recovery)<br />

Male No. 1 Female No. 1 Male No. 2 Female No. 2 Male No. 3 Female No. 3<br />

Week 1 6000 ppm 6000 ppm 6000 ppm 6000 ppm 6000 ppm 6000 ppm<br />

Weeks 2–3 3000 ppm 3000 ppm 3000 ppm 3000 ppm 3000 ppm 3000 ppm<br />

Weeks 4–9 3000 ppm 3000 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm<br />

Weeks 10–18 4000 ppm 4000 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm<br />

DIFENOCONAZOLE 201–272 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!