28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

456<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were observed on necropsy at term<strong>in</strong>ation. The oral median lethal dose (LD50) values <strong>in</strong><br />

mice (with 95% confidence <strong>in</strong>terval, CI) were 4665 (95% CI, 3322–6552) and 5359 (3816–7526)<br />

mg/kg bw for males and females, respectively (Malarkey, 1990).<br />

Rats<br />

Groups of five male and five female young adult Sprague Dawley (COBS CD) rats were given<br />

pyrimethanil (purity, 98.4%) as a s<strong>in</strong>gle dose at 0, 800, 1600 or 6400 mg/kg bw by gavage <strong>in</strong> 1%<br />

w/v methyl cellulose <strong>in</strong> distilled water. Treated rats were subjected to gross necropsy at the end of a<br />

14‐day observation period. Five males and three females at 6400 mg/kg bw were killed <strong>in</strong> extremis 6<br />

h after dos<strong>in</strong>g. Two surviv<strong>in</strong>g females at 6400 mg/kg bw showed slight signs of reduced muscle tone,<br />

body soil<strong>in</strong>g, urogenital soil<strong>in</strong>g and hunched posture until term<strong>in</strong>ation. All rats at 3200 mg/kg bw<br />

showed slight signs of reduced activity and muscle tone, ataxia and hunched posture, 1 h after dos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and recovery was complete after 14 days. At 1600 mg/kg bw, four out of five males and two out<br />

of five females showed slightly reduced muscle tone or reduced activity. Females showed complete<br />

recovery with<strong>in</strong> 24 h, and males with<strong>in</strong> 3 days. At 800 mg/kg bw, one male showed slightly reduced<br />

activity immediately after dos<strong>in</strong>g, but appeared normal with<strong>in</strong> 4 h. No effects on body weights were<br />

observed with<strong>in</strong> 14 days. No abnormal f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were observed on necropsy at term<strong>in</strong>ation. The oral<br />

LD 50<br />

values <strong>in</strong> rats were 4149 (95% CI, 3341–5153) and 5971 (95% CI, 4252–8386) mg/kg bw for<br />

males and females, respectively (Markham, 1989a).<br />

(b)<br />

Dermal irritation<br />

In a study of primary dermal irritation, young adult female New Zealand White rabbits were<br />

dermally exposed to 0.5 g of pyrimethanil (purity, 98.4%), moistened with distilled water, for 4 h. the<br />

rabbits were then observed for 3 days. Irritation was scored by the Draize method at 30–60 m<strong>in</strong>, 24,<br />

48, and 72 h after removal of dress<strong>in</strong>g. No erythema or oedema was noted on any rabbits dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

study. Pyrimethanil was considered to be a non-irritant to the <strong>in</strong>tact rabbit sk<strong>in</strong> (Markham, 1989c).<br />

(c)<br />

Ocular irritation<br />

In a study of primary ocular irritation, 0.1 ml of pyrimethanil (purity, 98.4%), was <strong>in</strong>stilled<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the conjunctival sac of one eye of three male and three female young adult New Zealand White<br />

rabbits. Irritation was scored by the Draize method at 1 h, and 1, 2, 3 and 4 days after exposure. One<br />

rabbit showed very slight redness of the conjunctiva, 1 h after <strong>in</strong>stillation, and recovered with<strong>in</strong> 24 h.<br />

Pyrimethanil was considered to be m<strong>in</strong>imally irritat<strong>in</strong>g to the eyes of rabbits under the conditions of<br />

this study (Markham, 1989d).<br />

(d)<br />

Dermal sensitization<br />

In a study of dermal sensitization with pyrimethanil (purity, 99.7%), 10 young female Dunk<strong>in</strong><br />

Hartley gu<strong>in</strong>ea-pigs were tested us<strong>in</strong>g the Buehler method. The ma<strong>in</strong> study was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g 10<br />

gu<strong>in</strong>ea-pigs each <strong>in</strong> the control and treated group. On the basis of results of the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary rangef<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

study, a maximum non-irritant concentration of 60% (w/v) of pyrimethanil <strong>in</strong> Alembicol D<br />

was selected for the <strong>in</strong>duction and challenge phases. In the treatment group, each gu<strong>in</strong>ea-pig received<br />

an <strong>in</strong>duction application of 60% w/v of the test material on the dorsal sk<strong>in</strong> under an occlusive dress<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for 6 h. Another control group of five males and five females received Alembicol D (vehicle) only.<br />

Two further <strong>in</strong>duction applications were made at weekly <strong>in</strong>tervals. Two weeks after the f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>duction<br />

application, test gu<strong>in</strong>ea-pigs were challenged with pyrimethanil at a concentration of 60% w/v under<br />

an occlusive dress<strong>in</strong>g for 6 h. Assessments of the dermal reactions were made 24, 48, and 72 h after<br />

the challenge application. Gu<strong>in</strong>ea-pigs <strong>in</strong> the control group were challenged with the vehicle. One<br />

gu<strong>in</strong>ea-pig <strong>in</strong> the control group was killed <strong>in</strong> extremis on study day 11. Necropsy f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

<strong>in</strong>tussusception of the jejunum, with the stomach and duodenum be<strong>in</strong>g distended with fluid and gas.<br />

Body weights and body-weight ga<strong>in</strong>s were not affected by the treatment. In the <strong>in</strong>duction phase, three<br />

PYRIMETHANIL 445–486 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!