28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

412<br />

Groups of five male and five female Wistar-derived Alpk:AP f<br />

SD rats were exposed to profenofos<br />

(purity, 92.1%) at a nom<strong>in</strong>al concentration of 2 mg/l (analytical concentration, 2.2 mg/) by noseonly<br />

<strong>in</strong>halation for 4 h. The particle size of the test aerosol ranged from 3.01 to 3.51 μm MMAD,<br />

with geometric standard deviation <strong>in</strong> the range of 1.59–1.65. This study was conducted <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />

with GLP regulations. There were no deaths and only transient signs of respiratory irritation (wet fur,<br />

salivation, piloerection, haunched posture) were observed <strong>in</strong> all rats dur<strong>in</strong>g and immediately after<br />

exposure. All males and all except three females had ga<strong>in</strong>ed weight by the end of the 14-day experimental<br />

period and no treatment-related effects were found at necropsy. The LC 50<br />

(4-h) of profenofos<br />

for males and females comb<strong>in</strong>ed was > 2.2 mg/l air (Rattray, 2004).<br />

In a similar design of study to the above, groups of five male and five female Sprague-Dawley<br />

rats were exposed (nose only) to profenofos (purity, 89.0%) at an analytical concentration of 2.03 mg/l<br />

for 4 h. The particle size of the test material was 2.5 μm (MMAD). This study was conducted <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />

with GLP regulations. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the 14-day observation period, there were no signs of gross<br />

toxicity, abnormal behaviour, mortality and no treatment-related effects on body weight or on gross<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs at necropsy. The LC 50<br />

(4-h) for male and female rats was > 2.03 mg/l air (Durando, 2005c).<br />

(d)<br />

Dermal irritation<br />

In a study of primary sk<strong>in</strong> irritation, 0.5 ml of undiluted technical profenofos (purity, 90.4%)<br />

was applied under semi-occlusive dress<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>tact sk<strong>in</strong> of New Zealand White rabbits for 4 h.<br />

This study was conducted <strong>in</strong> accordance with GLP regulations. Erythema was present at each observation<br />

time until day 21; and oedema was present until day 17 after application. The mean score for<br />

erythema formation at 24, 48 and 72 h was 1.94; that for oedema was 1.61. The primary irritation<br />

<strong>in</strong>dex was 3.3 (Kuhn, 1990b).<br />

Three New Zealand Alb<strong>in</strong>o rabbits received 0.5 ml of undiluted profenofos (purity, 92.1%) applied<br />

to the sk<strong>in</strong> for 4 h. This study was conducted <strong>in</strong> accordance with GLP regulations. Very slight to<br />

well-def<strong>in</strong>ed erythema and very slight oedema were found at the application site <strong>in</strong> all rabbits 1 h after<br />

the end of treatment, but the effects had disappeared with<strong>in</strong> 3 days. The primary dermal i rritation<br />

<strong>in</strong>dex was 1.2 (Merkel, 2004c). Profenofos was not irritat<strong>in</strong>g to the rabbit sk<strong>in</strong>.<br />

In a third study, a s<strong>in</strong>gle application of 0.5 ml of profenofos (purity, 89.0%) was made to the<br />

sk<strong>in</strong> of three New Zealand Alb<strong>in</strong>o rabbits for 4 h. This study was conducted <strong>in</strong> accordance with GLP<br />

regulations. Well-def<strong>in</strong>ed erythema and slight oedema were aga<strong>in</strong> noted 1 h after the treatment period.<br />

There were no signs of irritation on day 7, but desquamation was observed at all application sites.<br />

The primary dermal irritation <strong>in</strong>dex was 3.1 and profenofos was classified as moderately i rritat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

the sk<strong>in</strong> (Durando, 2005d).<br />

(e)<br />

Ocular irritation<br />

In a study of primary eye irritation, 0.1 ml of undiluted profenofos (purity, 90.5%) was <strong>in</strong>stilled<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the conjunctival sac of the eyes of New Zealand White rabbits. A statement of quality assurance<br />

was provided <strong>in</strong> the study report. However, no statements were made <strong>in</strong> the report regard<strong>in</strong>g GLP compliance.<br />

At 1 h after <strong>in</strong>stillation, the maximum average irritation score was 4.3 and 4.0 for the unwashed<br />

and washed eyes. The reactions were limited to a slight transient conjunctivitis (Cannelongo, 1982b).<br />

Similar results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> two more recent studies.<br />

Conjunctivitis was observed <strong>in</strong> all three New Zealand Alb<strong>in</strong>o rabbits 1 h after <strong>in</strong>stillation of<br />

0.1 ml of profenofos (purity, 92.1%). In this study, the conjunctivitis had disappeared with<strong>in</strong> 24 h of<br />

PROFENOFOS 403–443 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!