28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

105<br />

The immune system of adult mice appears to be relatively <strong>in</strong>sensitive to atraz<strong>in</strong>e. For example,<br />

exposure of female B6C3F 1<br />

mice to 250 or 500 mg atraz<strong>in</strong>e/kg bw per day for 14 days did not affect<br />

antibody synthesis, natural killer (NK) cell activity or lymphocyte proliferation, but did decrease<br />

body and lymphoid organ weights and shifted percentages of lymphocyte subpopulations (National<br />

Toxicology Program, 1994). The number of spleen cells produc<strong>in</strong>g antibody was <strong>in</strong>creased by 35%<br />

<strong>in</strong> groups of mice exposed to atraz<strong>in</strong>e at the lowest dose (25 mg/kg bw per day), but was similar to<br />

control values at higher doses. The authors dismissed this result as biologically irrelevant, because<br />

the antibody titre was not significantly decreased at this dose.<br />

However, a recent peer-reviewed version of the orig<strong>in</strong>al 1994 NTP report by Munson et al.<br />

(Karrow et al., 2005) concluded that the data at the lowest dose may represent an actual <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> numbers of antibody-produc<strong>in</strong>g cells <strong>in</strong> the spleen. Whether or not this type of enhancement is<br />

beneficial or detrimental to the <strong>in</strong>dividual has yet to be determ<strong>in</strong>ed. With atraz<strong>in</strong>e at the highest<br />

dose tested (500 mg/kg bw per day), resistance to an natural killer cell-dependent tumour-cell challenge<br />

was decreased, but resistance to bacterial challenge (Listeria monocytogenes) was not affected.<br />

However, animals at the highest dose experienced a 3% loss of body weight dur<strong>in</strong>g dos<strong>in</strong>g, vs a 10%<br />

body-weight ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> controls, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g marked overt toxicity at the highest dose, thus call<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />

question the biological relevance of the observed immune effects at 500 mg/kg bw per day. Furthermore,<br />

given the lack of effects on natural killer cell activity, even at the highest dose, it is difficult to<br />

conclude that immune suppression was directly responsible for the apparent <strong>in</strong>creased susceptibility<br />

to a tumour-cell challenge.<br />

In a separate study, the antibody response of C57Bl/6 female mice was suppressed 7 days<br />

after a s<strong>in</strong>gle exposure to a wide range of atraz<strong>in</strong>e doses (27.3–875 mg/kg bw). However, suppression<br />

was not dose–responsive, and no dose-related pattern of suppression or recovery was<br />

apparent 2, 3 or 6 weeks after exposure (Fournier et al., 1992). Although the relatively short halflife<br />

of atraz<strong>in</strong>e may expla<strong>in</strong> why these effects were not persistent, it does not provide a satisfactory<br />

explanation for the lack of a dose–response relationship. Chemicals that are immunotoxic<br />

<strong>in</strong> adult animals generally <strong>in</strong>duce similar effects, but at lower doses or for a prolonged period<br />

of time, if exposure occurs dur<strong>in</strong>g development and maturation of the immune system (Luebke<br />

et al., 2006).<br />

The effects of exposure to atraz<strong>in</strong>e dur<strong>in</strong>g immune system ontogeny were therefore evaluated<br />

<strong>in</strong> rats and mice. In replicate studies, exposure to atraz<strong>in</strong>e at a dose of 35 mg/kg bw per day from day<br />

10 of gestation until postnatal day 23 was found to suppress cellular and antibody-mediated immune<br />

function <strong>in</strong> male, but not female rats (Rooney et al., 2003). However, prelim<strong>in</strong>ary data from recent<br />

studies of dose–response did not corroborate suppressed function <strong>in</strong> developmentally exposed rats.<br />

The basis for this discrepancy is as yet unknown (Robert W. Luebke, personal communication).<br />

Studies of developmental exposure <strong>in</strong> mice <strong>in</strong>dicated that the percentage of antibody-produc<strong>in</strong>g cells<br />

<strong>in</strong> the spleens of immunized male offspr<strong>in</strong>g of mice implanted with time-release atraz<strong>in</strong>e pellets<br />

between days 10 and 12 of gestation was <strong>in</strong>creased by approximately 33%; female offspr<strong>in</strong>g were<br />

not affected (Rowe et al., 2006). Daily doses were <strong>in</strong> the same range as those used by Rooney et al.<br />

(2003). The results for studies of developmental exposure results suggest that the immature immune<br />

system of males may be more sensitive to the effects of atraz<strong>in</strong>e than that of the adult. Nevertheless,<br />

studies corroborat<strong>in</strong>g previous f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and those that <strong>in</strong>corporate a range of doses will be necessary<br />

to adequately determ<strong>in</strong>e NOAELs and LOAEL for immune function, and the relative sensitivity of<br />

the immune and endocr<strong>in</strong>e systems <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g rodents.<br />

3. Observations <strong>in</strong> humans<br />

A large number of studies have been published on the association between exposure to triaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g atraz<strong>in</strong>e, and cancer epidemiology. Concern<strong>in</strong>g the studies reported until 1999, three<br />

ATRAZINE 37–138 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!