28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

236<br />

male pups at 250 ppm were significantly lower than those of male pups <strong>in</strong> the control group on day<br />

21, but this difference was considered to be <strong>in</strong>cidental <strong>in</strong> view of the absence of any effect <strong>in</strong> the<br />

F 2<br />

generation (see Table 13). However, there was no measurement of <strong>food</strong> <strong>in</strong>take at this age and no<br />

detailed behavioural observations. There were no treatment-related cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs or ophthalmologic<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and no treatment-related macroscopic f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were noted at autopsy of the F 1<br />

pups.<br />

There were no treatment-related cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs, ophthalmological f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs or treatment-related<br />

mortalities among the F 1<br />

parental rats. One female at 25 ppm was found dead on day 2 of lactation,<br />

one female at 2500 ppm was found dead on day 1 of lactation and a second female at 2500 ppm was<br />

found dead on day 5 lactation. The tim<strong>in</strong>g of these deaths and the cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs associated with them<br />

suggested that they were due to non-treatment-related difficulties <strong>in</strong> labour and delivery.<br />

Body weights of the selected F1 parental rats were lower than those of rats at 0 ppm <strong>in</strong> the selected<br />

males at 250 ppm and 2500 ppm and females at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of dietary exposure (Table 12).<br />

Males <strong>in</strong> the group at 2500 ppm tended to have lower body-weight ga<strong>in</strong>s throughout the treatment<br />

period. The males at 250 ppm began the treatment period with body weights that were 8% lower than<br />

those of males <strong>in</strong> the control group dur<strong>in</strong>g the first week, result<strong>in</strong>g from a slight body-weight decrease<br />

after lactation, but body-weight ga<strong>in</strong>s thereafter were sporadically higher or lower than those<br />

of males <strong>in</strong> the control group. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the pre-mat<strong>in</strong>g phase, females <strong>in</strong> the group at 2500 ppm had<br />

significantly lower mean body weights than did females <strong>in</strong> the control group and lower body-weight<br />

ga<strong>in</strong>s dur<strong>in</strong>g most <strong>in</strong>tervals. Absolute body weights of the females at 25 and 250 ppm were not different<br />

from those of females <strong>in</strong> the control group dur<strong>in</strong>g pre-mat<strong>in</strong>g, although body-weight ga<strong>in</strong>s<br />

were occasionally significantly higher or lower. Absolute body weights for the females at 2500 ppm<br />

Table 12. Body-weight development of F1 generation <strong>in</strong> a multigeneration study of rats fed diets<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g difenoconazole<br />

Time-po<strong>in</strong>t/phase Study day(s) Dietary concentration (ppm)<br />

Males<br />

Females<br />

0 25 250 2500 0 25 250 2500<br />

Body weight (g)<br />

Start of treatment 0 237.0 235.5 217.6* 169.0* 178.2 177.3 166.5 138.2*<br />

7 304.3 298.7 280.8* 225.9* 206.9 208.3 194.0 163.2*<br />

49 525.4 517.6 504.0 432.8* 298.6 289.1 288.5 241.3*<br />

End of pre-mat<strong>in</strong>g 98 641.6 619.5 611.7 534.3* 346.2 329.1 333.1 268.8*<br />

Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of gestation a 101/121 — — — — 331.7 325.1 321.1 263.5*<br />

End of mat<strong>in</strong>g 119 665.0 639.2 631.5 560.4* — — — —<br />

End of gestation a 121/143 — — — — 452.6 439.3 446.8 375.6*<br />

Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of lactation a 122/144 — — — — 371.3 365.0 358.3 290.3*<br />

End of lactationa 144/165 — — — — 360.1 358.5 341.6 294.4*<br />

Term<strong>in</strong>ation 145/169<br />

(male/female)<br />

683.1 653.0 647.6 572.6* 375.2 354.8 361.4 291.3*<br />

Body weight change (g)<br />

Pre-mat<strong>in</strong>g 0–98 404.6 384.1 394.1 365.3* — — — —<br />

Gestation Approx. 110–132 — — — — 120.9 114.2 125.7 112.2<br />

Lactation Approx. 132–155 — — — — −11.2 −7.3 −16.7 1.7<br />

Full duration 0–145 446.1 417.6 430.0 403.6* — — — —<br />

From Giknis (1988)<br />

a<br />

Days variable based on when each dam started/ended the phase.<br />

* p ≤ 0.05, ANOVA + Dunnett test.<br />

DIFENOCONAZOLE 201–272 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!