28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

209<br />

of the study were unremarkable. On the basis of these data, difenoconazole was considered to be essentially<br />

non-toxic when applied topically under occlusion to <strong>in</strong>tact rabbit sk<strong>in</strong> (Mastrocco et al., 1987a).<br />

(c)<br />

Inhalation<br />

A test for the acute toxicity of difenoconazole technical (batch No. P 012060, purity, 96.2%)<br />

was conducted <strong>in</strong> a group of Tif RAI f (SPF) rats (five of each sex) exposed by <strong>in</strong>halation. Exposure<br />

was <strong>in</strong> a head/nose <strong>in</strong>halation system for 4 h to a mean analysed atmospheric concentration of<br />

3967/3285 (nom<strong>in</strong>al/gravimetric) mg/m 3 air (technically highest achievable concentration). In order<br />

to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a constant aerosol concentration with acceptable particle size distribution, it was necessary<br />

to blend difenoconazole with 5% Sipernat 50S, an <strong>in</strong>ert silica. The aerosol was generated from<br />

the solid test material by means of a brush-feed microniz<strong>in</strong>g jet mill. The aerosol from the dust generator<br />

was diluted with filtered humidified air. Ow<strong>in</strong>g to the properties of the test material, it was not<br />

possible to generate higher concentrations of aerosol. A control group of equal size was exposed to<br />

purified air under the same conditions as the test group. The rats were exam<strong>in</strong>ed for cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs of<br />

toxicity and mortality dur<strong>in</strong>g and after exposure and daily thereafter. Individual body weights were<br />

recorded immediately before exposure, on day 7 and day 14. The study was term<strong>in</strong>ated 14 days after<br />

dos<strong>in</strong>g. Autopsy was performed on all rats. Particular attention was given to the respiratory tract.<br />

No rats died dur<strong>in</strong>g the study. Symptoms observed <strong>in</strong> rats of both sexes and to a similar extent<br />

were dyspnoea dur<strong>in</strong>g and after exposure and piloerection, hunched posture and reduced locomotion<br />

after exposure. Reduced locomotion was not observed after the day of exposure, while hunched<br />

posture was also observed on the day after exposure, dyspnoea persisted to <strong>in</strong>clude day 4 and piloerection<br />

persisted to <strong>in</strong>clude day 6. All symptoms disappeared with<strong>in</strong> 7 days. In comparison with rats<br />

<strong>in</strong> the control group, the males showed a lower body-weight ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the first week and the females<br />

showed a higher body-weight ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the second week after exposure. No treatment-related macroscopic<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were observed. The median lethal concentration (LC 50<br />

) for difenoconazole suspended<br />

<strong>in</strong> air was > 3300 mg/m 3 (3.3 mg/l) for male and female rats (Hartmann, 1991).<br />

(d)<br />

Dermal irritation<br />

Difenoconazole technical (purity, 91.5%) was evaluated for acute dermal irritation potential <strong>in</strong><br />

three male and three female Hra:(NZW)SPF rabbits. Difenoconazole (0.5 g) was moistened with 0.9%<br />

sal<strong>in</strong>e and applied to a 6.25 cm 2 gauze pad that was placed on the shaved dorsal area. The gauze patch<br />

was covered with plastic, secured with tape and left for 4 h. Thereafter, patches were removed and the<br />

test sites were washed us<strong>in</strong>g tap water and paper towels. Adjacent areas of untreated sk<strong>in</strong> of each rabbit<br />

served as controls for the test. Signs of sk<strong>in</strong> erythema or oedema were scored after 30 m<strong>in</strong>, 24 h, 48 h,<br />

and 72 h after dos<strong>in</strong>g. Dermal irritation was scored and recorded accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Draize technique<br />

One female was found with grade 1 erythema after 30 m<strong>in</strong>. After 24 h, this reaction had cleared.<br />

No other sk<strong>in</strong> reactions were noted with any rabbit (Glaza, 1991a). The Meet<strong>in</strong>g concluded that<br />

difenocoazole was very slightly and transiently irritat<strong>in</strong>g to the sk<strong>in</strong> of rabbits.<br />

(e)<br />

Ocular irritation<br />

Difenoconazole technical (purity, 91.5%) was evaluated for acute eye irritation potential <strong>in</strong><br />

New Zealand White (Hra:(NZW)SPF) rabbits (<strong>in</strong>itial body weight, 2442–2696 g). Three males and<br />

three females <strong>in</strong> group 1 and two males and one female <strong>in</strong> group 2 were used. Each rabbit received 0.1<br />

ml of difenoconazole placed <strong>in</strong>to the everted lower lid of the right eye. The upper and lower lids were<br />

gently held together for 1 s to prevent loss of material and then released. In group 1 (three males and<br />

three females), the eyes of the rabbits were not washed, while <strong>in</strong> group 2 (two males and one female),<br />

the eyes of the rabbits were washed with lukewarm tap water for 60 s start<strong>in</strong>g 30 s after <strong>in</strong>stillation<br />

of difenoconazole. The eyes were exam<strong>in</strong>ed at 1, 24, 48 72 and 96 h after dos<strong>in</strong>g. Eye irritation was<br />

scored and recorded accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Draize technique.<br />

DIFENOCONAZOLE 201–272 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!