28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

424<br />

body‐weight ga<strong>in</strong>s (3–10% decrease) on days 14 and 21 of lactation. There were no treatment-related<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs, necropsy f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs or histopathological observations at any dose. Reproduction was not<br />

affected at any dose. There were no effects on mat<strong>in</strong>g behaviour, duration of gestation, the number<br />

of litters with live-born pups, the total number of pups per litter, pre-wean<strong>in</strong>g losses, survival <strong>in</strong>dices<br />

and other reproductive <strong>in</strong>dices. No macroscopic f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were noted <strong>in</strong> pups.<br />

The NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was 400 ppm, equivalent to 35 mg/kg bw per day. On the<br />

basis of reduced body-weight ga<strong>in</strong>s and <strong>food</strong> consumption at 400 ppm, the NOAEL for parental and<br />

pup systemic toxicity was 100 ppm (7 mg/kg bw per day) (M<strong>in</strong>or & Richter, 1994).<br />

In an earlier three-generation study of reproduction <strong>in</strong> CD stra<strong>in</strong> Charles River alb<strong>in</strong>o rats, dietary<br />

treatment with profenofos (purity, 95.5%) at 0, 0.2, 1.0 and 20 ppm (equivalent to 0, 0.01, 0.05,<br />

and 1.0 mg/kg bw per day) did not affect bra<strong>in</strong> acetylchol<strong>in</strong>esterase activity, reproductive performance,<br />

or the development and survival of the offspr<strong>in</strong>g through three generations. The NOAEL for<br />

reproductive effects was at least 20 ppm, equal to 1 mg/kg bw per day; the highest dose tested. This<br />

study was conducted before development of FIFRA guidel<strong>in</strong>es. The data had not been <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />

validated (Phillips, 1978).<br />

(b)<br />

Developmental toxicity<br />

Rats<br />

In a study of developmental toxicity, groups of 25 pregnant Sim:(SD)BR Sprague-Dawley rats<br />

were given profenofos (purity, 88.0%) at a dose of 0, 10, 30, 60, 90, or 120 mg/kg bw per day by oral<br />

gavage on days 6–15 of gestation. The study was not conducted <strong>in</strong> accordance with GLP regulations<br />

and there was no claim for compliance with any particular guidel<strong>in</strong>es. However, the study design conforms<br />

to the OECD guidel<strong>in</strong>e No 414. The rats were exam<strong>in</strong>ed daily for changes <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs and<br />

were weighed on days 0, 6 to 15 and 20 of gestation. Food consumption was measured on days 6, 13<br />

and 20 of gestation. On day 21 of gestation, all dams were killed and fetuses were delivered by caesarean<br />

section. Uter<strong>in</strong>e contents were exam<strong>in</strong>ed and fetuses were weighed, sexed and exam<strong>in</strong>ed for abnormalities.<br />

Intracranial structures were exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> approximately half of the fetuses from each litter.<br />

Maternal toxicity was evident at a dose of 120 mg/kg bw per day. Four rats died or were term<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

and <strong>food</strong> consumption was reduced on days 6–13. Various cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs of toxicity (e.g. hypoactivity<br />

or tremors, ocular porphyr<strong>in</strong> discharge, dyspnoea, diuresis, and hypothermia) were noted. Two<br />

of the four dams that died displayed these cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs, while the other two did not. In addition, two of<br />

the dams that died also showed scattered haemorrhages <strong>in</strong> the stomach upon gross necropsy. One rat<br />

<strong>in</strong> the group at 60 mg/kg bw per day also died, but there were no cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs of toxicity at doses of<br />

up to 90 mg/kg bw per day. Measures of prenatal toxicity such as litter size, percentage of live fetuses,<br />

number of resorbed fetuses, number of dead fetuses and the mean sex ratio were not significantly different<br />

between the control and treated groups. Malformations and developmental variants observed <strong>in</strong><br />

fetuses <strong>in</strong> the control group and those <strong>in</strong> groups receiv<strong>in</strong>g profenofos were with<strong>in</strong> the normal range.<br />

Profenofos was not embryotoxic or teratogenic <strong>in</strong> rats given doses of up to 120 mg/kg bw<br />

per day. The NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 90 mg/kg bw per day on the basis of mortality and<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs of toxicity seen at 120 mg/kg bw per day. The NOAEL for developmental toxicity was<br />

120 mg/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested (Harris, 1982).<br />

Another study of developmental toxicity <strong>in</strong> rats given profenofos at lower doses arrived at<br />

similar conclusions. In this study, 23–25 pregnant JCL-SD rats were given profenofos (purity, 95.8%)<br />

at a dose of 0, 18, 35, or 70 mg/kg bw per day via <strong>in</strong>tubation on days 7–17 of gestation. The doses<br />

selected for test<strong>in</strong>g were based upon the results of a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary range-f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g study <strong>in</strong> which a dose<br />

of 140 mg/kg bw per day caused death <strong>in</strong> five out of six treated rats dur<strong>in</strong>g days 8–15 of gestation.<br />

PROFENOFOS 403–443 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!