28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

93<br />

In a study on the effect of atraz<strong>in</strong>e on LH secretion <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tact proestrus female rat, LE rats<br />

display<strong>in</strong>g regular 4-day estrous cycles reveived atraz<strong>in</strong>e (purity, not reported) at a dose of 0, 6.25,<br />

12.5 or 25 mg/kg bw per day by gavage through a full ovarian cycle, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g at vag<strong>in</strong>al estrus.<br />

The rats were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed on a 14-h light : 10-h dark schedule (lights on at 05:00) and dos<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

done at 12:00. The last dose was adm<strong>in</strong>istered on the day of vag<strong>in</strong>al proestrus and groups were<br />

killed at 2-h <strong>in</strong>tervals until lights out (12:00, 14:00, 16:00, 18:00 and 20:00). Atraz<strong>in</strong>e, at all doses<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istered, resulted <strong>in</strong> a significant decrease <strong>in</strong> peak LH concentration when determ<strong>in</strong>ed at 18:00.<br />

However, the effect was of a similar extent at all doses tested, and the study authors believed that<br />

the flat dose–response relationship reflected the effect of atraz<strong>in</strong>e on LH with<strong>in</strong> this range of dos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Cooper et al., <strong>2007</strong>).<br />

Monkeys<br />

In a study on the effect of atraz<strong>in</strong>e on pituitary hormone secretion <strong>in</strong> a non-human primate<br />

model, groups of six female ovariectomized Rhesus monkeys received atraz<strong>in</strong>e (purity, 97.2%; <strong>in</strong><br />

0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose) at a dose of 0 or 25 mg/kg bw per day by oral gavage for 30 days, and<br />

were then kept an additional 60 days for recovery. All monkeys received a subcutaneous <strong>in</strong>jection of<br />

estradiol benzoate (330 µg) on day 5 before treatment, on days 5 and 26 of treatment and on day 26 of<br />

recovery. Blood samples for hormone analysis (LH, FSH, prolact<strong>in</strong>, progesterone, E2, cortisol) were<br />

collected from each monkey approximately 12 h after adm<strong>in</strong>istration of E2 (as estradiol benzoate),<br />

and then at 6-h <strong>in</strong>tervals (up to 102 h after adm<strong>in</strong>istration of E2).<br />

No treatment-related cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs were observed. Body weight was not affected by treatment<br />

except <strong>in</strong> one monkey treated with atraz<strong>in</strong>e that lost 1 kg (19%) of its <strong>in</strong>itial body weight over the<br />

course of the study. This monkey displayed a marked suppression of LH and FSH surges after 5 or<br />

26 days of treatment, which was confounded with the effects of other non-specific stressors. In the<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g monkeys, no treatment-related effects on concentrations of LH, FSH, E2, progesterone or<br />

prolact<strong>in</strong> were observed. However, a non-specific stress response <strong>in</strong> treated monkeys appeared to be<br />

associated with <strong>in</strong>tolerance to high doses of atraz<strong>in</strong>e. This resulted <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ability to acclimatize to<br />

experimental conditions as demonstrated by smaller reductions <strong>in</strong> cortisol <strong>in</strong> monkeys treated with<br />

atraz<strong>in</strong>e when compared with controls. In conclusion, the primate model for assess<strong>in</strong>g effects on LH<br />

secretion is limited by <strong>in</strong>tra- and <strong>in</strong>ter-animal variability <strong>in</strong> the normal response to estrogen-<strong>in</strong>duced<br />

LH secretion, which is confounded by apparent stress effects related to the required experimental<br />

design (Osterburg & Breckenridge, 2004; Simpk<strong>in</strong>s & Eldridge, 2004).<br />

(d)<br />

Studies on reproductive and developmental effects<br />

In a study designed to exam<strong>in</strong>e the effects of atraz<strong>in</strong>e on suckl<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>duced prolact<strong>in</strong> release<br />

<strong>in</strong> Wistar rats, dams were given atraz<strong>in</strong>e (purity, 98%) at a dose of 0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg bw<br />

twice per day by gavage on postnatal days 1–4, or the DA-receptor agonist bromocript<strong>in</strong>e (BROM,<br />

which is known to suppress the release of prolact<strong>in</strong>) twice per day by subcutaneous <strong>in</strong>jection at a<br />

dose of 0.052, 0.104, 0.208, or 0.417 mg/kg bw. Serum prolact<strong>in</strong> concentrations were measured<br />

on postnatal day 3 us<strong>in</strong>g a serial sampl<strong>in</strong>g technique and <strong>in</strong>-dwell<strong>in</strong>g cardiac catheters. The study<br />

hypothesis was that early lactational exposure to agents that suppress the suckl<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>duced release<br />

of prolact<strong>in</strong> would lead to a disruption <strong>in</strong> the development of the tubero<strong>in</strong>fundibular neurons <strong>in</strong> the<br />

pups (presumably due to the lack of prolact<strong>in</strong> derived from the dam’s milk), with the consequence of<br />

impaired regulation of prolact<strong>in</strong> secretion, hyperprolact<strong>in</strong>aemia before puberty and prostatitis <strong>in</strong> the<br />

adult male offspr<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

A significant rise <strong>in</strong> the release of prolact<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> serum was noted <strong>in</strong> all females <strong>in</strong> the control<br />

group with<strong>in</strong> 10 m<strong>in</strong> of the <strong>in</strong>itiation of suckl<strong>in</strong>g. At 50 mg/kg bw, atraz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>hibited the suckl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>duced<br />

release of prolact<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> all females, while atraz<strong>in</strong>e at a dose of 25 and 12.5 mg/kg bw <strong>in</strong>hibited<br />

this release <strong>in</strong> some dams but had no discernible effect <strong>in</strong> others. Give twice per day at a at<br />

ATRAZINE 37–138 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!