28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

422<br />

1 out of 70; lowest dose, 3 out of 60; <strong>in</strong>termediate dose, 2 out of 60; and highest dose, 6 out of 70).<br />

These histopathological f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were not considered to be treatment-related, or to be suggestive of<br />

an oncogenic effect. No <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidence of liver carc<strong>in</strong>omas occurred.<br />

Inhibition of plasma chol<strong>in</strong>esterase activity <strong>in</strong> rats <strong>in</strong> the group at 100 ppm was statistically<br />

significant at all sampl<strong>in</strong>g times and ranged from 30% to 62% <strong>in</strong> males and 50% to 62% <strong>in</strong> females.<br />

There was a statistically significant <strong>in</strong>hibition of plasma chol<strong>in</strong>esterase activity at some sampl<strong>in</strong>g times<br />

<strong>in</strong> males at 0.3 ppm and <strong>in</strong> males and females at 10 ppm. However, <strong>in</strong>hibition never exceeded 20% and<br />

28% <strong>in</strong> rats at 0.3 ppm and 10 ppm, respectively. There was a statistically significant <strong>in</strong>hibition of erythrocyte<br />

acetylchol<strong>in</strong>esterase activity that ranged from 58% to 71% <strong>in</strong> rats at 100 ppm and from 12% to<br />

31% <strong>in</strong> rats at 10 ppm. Inhibition of erythrocyte acetylchol<strong>in</strong>esterase activity was noted at some time<br />

Table 3. Results of studies of genotoxicity with profenofos<br />

End-po<strong>in</strong>t Test object Concentration Purity (%) Results Reference<br />

In vitro<br />

Reverse mutation<br />

Gene mutation<br />

Chromosomal<br />

a berration a<br />

Salmonella typhimurium<br />

TA98, TA100, TA1535,<br />

TA1537, Escherichia coli<br />

WP2 uvrA<br />

Mouse lymphoma L5178Y/<br />

Tk+/-cells<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese hamster ovary cells<br />

(CCL 61)<br />

312.5–5000 μg/plate <strong>in</strong><br />

DMSO<br />

0.078–0.625 μg/ml <strong>in</strong><br />

DMSO<br />

4.69–75 μg/ml <strong>in</strong><br />

DMSO<br />

Chromosomal Ch<strong>in</strong>ese hamsters 13–52 mg/kg bw <strong>in</strong><br />

a berration b CMC<br />

Micronucleus<br />

f ormation c<br />

Dom<strong>in</strong>ant lethal<br />

mutation<br />

Mitotic gene conversion,<br />

mitotic cross<strong>in</strong>g<br />

over, reverse mutation<br />

Mitotic disjunctione<br />

Unscheduled DNA<br />

synthesis<br />

Unscheduled DNA<br />

synthesis<br />

Mouse (Tif:MAGf) bone<br />

marrow<br />

90.7 Negative<br />

± S9<br />

91.8 Negative<br />

± S9<br />

90.7 Negative<br />

± S9<br />

Ogorek<br />

(1991)<br />

Strasser<br />

(1982)<br />

Strasser<br />

(1990)<br />

88.1 Negative Hool<br />

(1981)<br />

50–200 mg/kg bw 90.7 Negative Hertner<br />

(1990)<br />

0–216 mg/kg bw 72 Equivocal El Nahas<br />

et al. (1988)<br />

Male mice (NMRI) 35 and 100 mg/kg bw NR Negative Fritz<br />

(1974a)<br />

Saccharomyces cerevisiae<br />

D7<br />

Saccharomyces cerevisiae<br />

D61.M<br />

Rat hepatocytes<br />

Human fibroblasts<br />

12.5–500 μg/ml without<br />

activation, 640–1000<br />

μg/ml with activation<br />

39.06–10000 μg/ml with<br />

and without activation<br />

0.02–2.91 μg/ml <strong>in</strong><br />

DMSO<br />

0.46–58.2 μg/ml <strong>in</strong><br />

DMSO<br />

90 Negative Arni<br />

(1982)<br />

91.8 Negative Hool<br />

(1986)<br />

91.8 Negative Puri<br />

(1982a)<br />

91.8 Negative Puri<br />

(1982b)<br />

CMC, caboxymethyl cellulose; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide, NR, not reported; S9, 9000 × g supernatant prepared from<br />

Arochlor-<strong>in</strong>duced rat liver.<br />

a<br />

Cells were evaluated after: (i) 3-h <strong>in</strong>cubation without metabolic activation at 18.75–75 μg/ml; (ii) 3-h <strong>in</strong>cubation with<br />

metabolic activation at 4.69–18.75 μg/ml; and (iii) 24-h <strong>in</strong>cubation without metabolic activation at 9.38–37.5 μg/ml.<br />

b<br />

Bone-marrow cells were exam<strong>in</strong>ed for anomalies such as s<strong>in</strong>gle Jolly bodies, polyploid cells, fragments of nuclei <strong>in</strong><br />

erythrocytes, micronuclei <strong>in</strong> erythroblasts and leukopoietic cells.<br />

c<br />

Micronuclei were counted <strong>in</strong> bone-marrow erythrocytes.<br />

d<br />

A formulation was tested that conta<strong>in</strong>ed unknown formulation components. Under the experimental conditions (small<br />

number of animals, only one sex, low reproducibility, unusually high background values, no overall clear dose–response<br />

relationship, only one sampl<strong>in</strong>g time <strong>in</strong> some tests), some mutagenic activity of the formulation could not be excluded<br />

but the result was not confirmed <strong>in</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>e-compliant studies.<br />

e<br />

Monosomic colonies result<strong>in</strong>g from chromosomal loss were recognized as leuc<strong>in</strong>e-requir<strong>in</strong>g white colonies that were<br />

resistant to cycloheximide.<br />

PROFENOFOS 403–443 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!