28.01.2014 Views

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

Pesticide residues in food — 2007: Toxicological ... - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

244<br />

weekly throughout the study. At the end of the scheduled period, five male and five females per<br />

group were perfused <strong>in</strong> situ. Selected nervous system tissues were removed, processed and exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

m icroscopically.<br />

There were no deaths; this is a remarkable difference between this study, <strong>in</strong> which cage-side<br />

observation is an important feature, and an earlier s<strong>in</strong>gle-dose study (Argus, 1987) <strong>in</strong> which there was<br />

40% mortality and significant cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs of toxicity at 2000 mg/kg bw. Evidence of a toxic effect<br />

at 2000 mg/kg bw per day on day 1, at the time of peak effect, was reflected <strong>in</strong> a number of adverse<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical abnormalities, with females be<strong>in</strong>g more affected than males. The more common signs were<br />

upward curvature of the sp<strong>in</strong>e, tip-toe gait and decreased activity. All treatment-related cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs<br />

seen on day 1 showed complete recovery by day 5 (males) and day 7 (females). In addition on day 1,<br />

body weights at 2000 mg/kg bw per day were lower than those of males and females <strong>in</strong> the control<br />

group (approximately 7%). Body weight rema<strong>in</strong>ed lower for males throughout the study (4% by day<br />

15) with <strong>food</strong> consumption lower for males <strong>in</strong> week 1. At 200 mg/kg bw per day, body weights were<br />

statistically significantly lower (2%) than those of the controls on day 1 for both sexes.<br />

On day 1, forelimb grip strength was lower than that of controls for males at 200 and 2000<br />

mg/kg bw per day. Forelimb grip strength was statistically significantly higher than that of controls<br />

on day 15 for females at 2000 mg/kg bw. The difference was seen only <strong>in</strong> females at one time-po<strong>in</strong>t;<br />

<strong>in</strong> the absence of any other f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs at this time-po<strong>in</strong>t, this small difference from control values was<br />

considered to be <strong>in</strong>cidental to treatment. There were no other differences from control values for<br />

forelimb grip strength. At the 200 mg/kg bw, the lower forelimb grip strength observed on day 1 <strong>in</strong><br />

males was not associated with perturbations <strong>in</strong> any of the other functional assessments or microscopic<br />

pathology. There were no treatment-related effects on h<strong>in</strong>dlimb grip strength, land<strong>in</strong>g-foot<br />

splay measurements, or time to tail-flick at any dose.<br />

At 2000 mg/kg bw, motor activity was lower than that for controls for females on day 1, with<br />

evidence of some recovery on day 8 and complete recovery by day 15. This lower motor activity <strong>in</strong> females<br />

was not associated with perturbations <strong>in</strong> any of the other functional assessments or microscopic<br />

pathology, but may have reflected the adverse general cl<strong>in</strong>ical observations that had not recovered<br />

until day 7. On day 1, at the time of anticipated maximum effect, males at 200 or 2000 mg/kg bw had<br />

slightly higher activities than did males <strong>in</strong> the control group. The differences were small, the response<br />

was not proportional to dose and was <strong>in</strong> the opposite direction from females and <strong>in</strong>consistent with the<br />

general cl<strong>in</strong>ical condition of the rats (e.g. decreased activity). Therefore, these small differences from<br />

control values were considered to be <strong>in</strong>cidental to treatment. There were no treatment-related effects<br />

on body weight, <strong>food</strong> consumption, FOB or motor activity <strong>in</strong> rats at 25 mg/kg bw.<br />

There were no effects on bra<strong>in</strong> weight, nor any treatment-related microscopic f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the<br />

tissues of the nervous system after s<strong>in</strong>gle doses of difenoconazole of up to 2000 mg/kg bw.<br />

The NOAEL for neurotoxicity <strong>in</strong> rats treated with difenoconazole was 25 mg/kg bw on the basis<br />

of reduced forelimb grip strength <strong>in</strong> males at 200 mg/kg bw. The Meet<strong>in</strong>g considered that this effect<br />

was not necessarily an expression of neurotoxicity, although it was an adverse effect of treatment,<br />

because it was not observed <strong>in</strong> females as well as males, even at a dose that was 10 times higher,<br />

and <strong>in</strong> males it was not supported by any of the multiple other possible end-po<strong>in</strong>ts for neurotoxicity<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed (P<strong>in</strong>to, 2006a).<br />

In a multiple-dose study of neurotoxicity, groups of 12 male and 12 female Alpk:AP f<br />

SD<br />

(Wistar-derived) rats were given diets conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g difenconazole (purity, 94.3 %) at a concentration of<br />

of 0, 40, 250 or 1500 ppm, equal to 0, 2.8, 17.3 and 107.0 mg/kg bw per day <strong>in</strong> males and 0, 3.2, 19.5<br />

and 120.2 mg/kg bw per day <strong>in</strong> females, for at least 90 days.<br />

Food and water consumption and body weights were measured once each week throughout the<br />

study. A check of the general state of health of the rats was made before the study began and daily<br />

throughout the study. Detailed observations (dur<strong>in</strong>g which each rat was removed from its cage and<br />

DIFENOCONAZOLE 201–272 JMPR <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!